and then chucked out and deported by the federal government when the PM needed to brandish his toughness
Dunno whether I'd want to believe that that was his
entire motivation. The federal government has stated that there
never was any exemption in the legalese allowing unvaccinated people to be permitted in, and it has been said that the PM
was at liberty to make a final ruling, even in the
spirit of said legalese if he so chooses, rather than merely revisiting lower levels' decisions and correct whatever mistakes he finds there.
I have to say that I'd like to hear the
first judge explain his reasoning, though. By allowing Djokovic to remain, in my opinion, he
either stated that the feds' statement "no exemptions" was a
falsehood, or that the causa Djokovic was somehow
above that law (possible IMHO, but sure merits an explanation). Which one was it, your honor ... ?
Personally I think that insisting that staff in nursing homes, hospitals and such be vaccinated is a good idea. Politics, bloody politics.
It
is a good idea as long as you can get
enough staff with that additional qualification, and there are enough people who think that that can be done that several nations already made that mandatory (France) or are very likely to follow suit (Germany).
General mandatory vaccination is a much stranger beast, alas. I think that it would still be a good
idea, what with our vaccination rate being 75%-ish and the rate thought necessary to keep the 5th wave well manageable having been upped to 95% by omicron, but that alone doesn't make such a thing
legal for our federal gvt to enact. In order to suspend constitutional rights, the suspension must be demonstrated to be
strictly necessary, and mandatory vaccination is too late for the current 4th wave while the variant promising to fuel the 5th, omicron, has several renowned epidemiologists thinking about whether that might already be the one changing COVID-19 from a pandemic to an endemic illness ...