Author Topic: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'  (Read 108053 times)

Jitter

  • Valkyrie
  • Admiral of a Sunken Ship
  • *
  • JOE guardian, SS Kuru keeper, Finn with some magic
  • Preferred pronouns: She/her, they/their
  • Posts: 4123
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #585 on: April 23, 2021, 07:04:30 AM »
To add on Cat’s commentary, in internet discussions there is always the collateral readership. So evwn if your explanation doesn’t make any difference to the person you are talking to, someone else just reading and not commenting may get something important out of it.

I treasure a memory of explaining herd immunity to an anti-vaxxer (this was long before the current pandemic) who was making some outrageous claims and getting thanked by a by-reader who said they had finally understood and see now why vaccines are important. Usually you don’t get the feedback, but in al, things (public) internet there are more readers than actively engage.
🇫🇮 🇬🇧 🇸🇪 🇫🇷 (🇩🇪)(🇯🇵)((🇨🇳))

:A2chap03: :A2chap04: :A2chap05:

Proud ruler of Joensuu Airport, Admiral of S/S Kuru on the Finnish lake systems. Also the Water Mother.

LetsEatBees

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Preferred pronouns: She/Her
  • Posts: 16
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #586 on: April 23, 2021, 07:50:12 AM »
Something unsettling about LP that took me a awhile to realize is this seems to have a very clear message (although 2 different ones at once but that’s a different problem I have) where most of her other work really doesn’t. For me it reinforces what I thought about the structure of SSSS, and it kind of revels what was going on under the hood as far as themes goes: not a whole lot. Don’t get me wrong that doesn’t make SSSS worse but does make LP both bafflingly confrontational, and an unpleasant read, and it’s kind of sad/funny that I preferred when she didn’t try to write about more complex themes.

This doesn’t really change my rating for SSSS (5/10 – 6/10) but that just seems more like a condemnation of me for not being interested in better media cus that seems to be what I wind up obsessing over. On the plus side it’s opened my eyes to webcomics could be and vastly improved my opinion of them, whatever becomes my next big fixation is probably going to be another webcomic.

Sometimes I feel like a bad person for focusing on technical problems instead of problematic content,  I feel that they are equally important or can drown out good or bad content if the problem is all encompassing enough.

For some background I used to into a particular anime (for a few years too long) that had the public perception of being “cringe” and mostly from the kind of people who bully people for liking anime anyway, but currently has the reputation of being problematic(and by extension, poison) by basically everyone. And I’m terrified to suggest I unironically liked it, it just reinforced the reasons why I don’t generally talk about media I like, joining the forum is this forum only time I broke that rule.

Again, this is all conjecture, I don’t want to ruin peoples’ day or anything, I’m really new to all of this. This whole event just affected me very deeply and I feel self-conscious about that, like it shouldn’t affect me but it does.
Native: English
We're Looking Into The Future, Chuck
"Flammable undiagrammable sentiments Pass between animal beings"

Grade E cat

  • Ranger
  • ****
  • Headcanon firing in 3... 2... 1...
  • Preferred pronouns: her
  • Posts: 907
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #587 on: April 23, 2021, 08:12:07 AM »
To add on Cat’s commentary, in internet discussions there is always the collateral readership. So evwn if your explanation doesn’t make any difference to the person you are talking to, someone else just reading and not commenting may get something important out of it.

I treasure a memory of explaining herd immunity to an anti-vaxxer (this was long before the current pandemic) who was making some outrageous claims and getting thanked by a by-reader who said they had finally understood and see now why vaccines are important. Usually you don’t get the feedback, but in al, things (public) internet there are more readers than actively engage.

Good addition. Some of my current knowledge was picked up from collateral readership.

@LetsEatBees I personally believe that completely unproblematic works don't exist, and am lucky enough to be able to enjoy something all while being aware that some groups of people are being badly treated in it. However, upon enjoying such works, the are things I have gradually discovered to be important to remember :
1) Do not let that bad portrayal influence the sort of person you vote for.
2) Do not let it be the only piece of media depicting that group that you consume.
3) Do not let it influence how you treat a member of that group you run into or meet in real life or online.
4) If you would like to be allowed to like something without being bothered about it, other people should be allowed to not like or turn away from it without being bothered. I think the latter is doubly true if you know there is something problematic in the work, as there are people out there for which that element alone will be enough to make it unwatchable to them.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2021, 11:05:33 AM by Grade E cat »
Native: :fr:
So much part of my life it might as well be native: :us:
Few and far between practice opportunities: :es:
A little learned during hardcore anime fan phase: :jp:
Only alternative to English in early junior high school: :de:

Do what cat. Lalli's way of life since age three.

esedege

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #588 on: April 23, 2021, 08:31:01 AM »
I'm not sure how to avoid getting lost with formatting and spoiler-no spoiler discussion (now I see what you meant, catbirds).
Spoiler: this is shorter • show

From my experience, "can I explain why I am hurt" has not worked, but if you truly would lend people an ear, then they'd appreciate it. The thing is that the experience of people of ethnic minorities often sounds totally alien to people, so when I explain it, a lot of people will just scratch their heads and go "well don't watch it then." And I understand that reaction, because needing to see something's flaws exposed often does completely ruin the experience of enjoying it.

So, in a simple equation, it's the difficult process of balancing "I enjoy this thing, let me enjoy it" and "this other group of people has never been able to enjoy things the same way, what do I do now?" If you need context, that group of youtubers you mention that often discuss issues related to race/sexuality/gender have pretty much always elicited a "what are you going to tell me, racism exists?" type of reaction from me. I made it through parts of a couple of their videos at different points in time, and then skipped to the conclusion because most of it was just telling me more or less what I already knew. But, then again, you've learned things from them and that might help the people around you in the long run! So, for that, I hope you continue to learn from them as long as they're making good content.


I subscribe totally what both Jitter and Grade E cat have added to the discussion regarding the first part of this spoiler. ^-^ As I said, now I'm conflicted just thinking about watching Silence of the Lambs, but I'm happy with it being like that.

I think that reaction you mention derives from the fact that you –sadly– live what they are criticising. I've found myself reacting the same way when somebody wanted to explain to me why 'I don't care that you love another man as long as whatever you do you do it in private' is homophobic to the core. But, in order for them to win other people over, people that are oblivious, they have to start at the basics. The most basic of basics. They have to educate people, so they cannot asume for their audience to have any literacy in the matters they talk about. As I said, I watched the trans and queer fights for equality and fair representation with sympathy but distance. I had no real nor substantiated opinion on the matter. If Contrapoints would have started criticising me for being none the wiser, or setting the starting point too far from me as an average guy, I would not have been able to relate to her. Of course that's familiar terrain for people already living those situations.

Spoiler: Steven Universe, some spoilers ahead • show

Well, I cannot contain my excitement when someone mentions SU! :sparkle:

Rebecca Sugar defines herself (Twitter) as "Cartoonist, animator, songwriter, creator of Steven Universe. My views are my own. Nonbinary, bisexual, pronoun flexible, she/they." All the Gems in SU are drawn with a female-type body (even when each of them has a different body type), and are voice by women, they use 'she' but have no real gender. They are alien to humans both in the broader and in the stricter sense of the word. They all have deep personalities, traumas, inner fights, insecurities… They're not token 'weird people' to appease the LGTBQ collective, they are people. I don't think I've cried so much with any other piece of media as I've cried watching SU, tears of sadness, joy, and simply when overcome with emotion. And I'm usually told that I'm quite aloof to cutting extremes.

Now watch it and cry! Watch it and cry I say! :'D


Spoiler: show

thank you for the work you are putting into understanding transphobia and facing your hesitancy head on!!


: blushes a bit :
Ok, maybe I'm not that aloof.

Sometimes I feel like a bad person for focusing on technical problems instead of problematic content,  I feel that they are equally important or can drown out good or bad content if the problem is all encompassing enough.

I concur it's hard not to appreciate the technical marvels of problematic works, but it also feels wrong to do so.

Maple

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #589 on: April 23, 2021, 09:01:18 AM »


Spoiler: show

just as superdark, i deeply understand where you are coming from and how you feel. i don't think either of us described what you're talking about. i think your feelings are entirely justified and perfectly reasonable feelings to have around this. i have no want to argue against it, so i hope it does not come off that way. i do not in any way want to excuse or justify bigotry, intentional or not.

i think criticizing, discussing, and analyzing media is very important. i think that's my tldr, the Crux of my feelings about all this - the ability to practice critical thinking around media. it's not reasonable to expect everyone to be hypercritical of every piece of media, constantly, but like... it's healthy to have the skill. engaging with others and explaining why something is hurtful, or wrong, or part of a propaganda narrative - that's an important thing to do. because it's true, media DOES affect people. it DOES cause damage. but i also think media is shaped by the culture that created it - it's kind of a two way street. the context in which a media is presented has so much to say, too, like, under what genre or pretenses are you being sold on a thing? if there's a popular book depicting an unhealthy relationship, is it being advertised as a romance, or as a psychological horror? what angle will filmmakers trying to adapt the book take? will the movie adaptation become more known in the mainstream than the book? will it affect how people think about the book? idk i have a bachelor degree in art history and it's always Context All The Way Down.

i'm good friends with many people who are critical of the media we watch. but i'm no longer friends with people who have over the years, tried to persuade me directly to Stop Liking Thing. not because they dislike the thing, that's fine, and not because i think they are unjustified in disliking it, and not even because they dislike a thing they haven't even read or watched. it's fine! the point where a friendship can no longer thrive is when  they can no longer trust me. it's fine if they can't trust me anymore on that basis, that's their choice and their very real feelings! but if they message me to tell me "hello haiz i see you are ENDORSING MURDER because you like this animated cartoon" that's not a real good faith conversation, and i don't feel very comfortable being friends with someone who thinks i am endorsing murder.

like, i've never been big on liking ~*Problematic Media*~ or anything, it's just that by the nature of everything being inherently flawed, there is no rulebook or clear guidelines on when a piece of media crosses into Harmful. like, i would definitely argue that SSSS and its presentation of race is at least somewhat harmful, especially if read by someone who already has a very... particular idea of scandinavia. but we can also see how many people who have read and, at some point, loved SSSS are still critical of it, and are/have been willing to read it through that critical lens. i also think a lot of us have reached the point where we just don't feel comfortable with it anymore. talking to fans (or former fans) who've been around for a while always feels like we're passing around a bottle containing a very strong drink and taking a long and hard sip out of it. there are people i trust to have not been accidentally radicalized by SSSS, while i also believe it's something that CAN happen.

the thing is mostly that i no longer trust random claims of "this media is Bad actually." every so often it will come from very real and justified hurt and concern over how a marginalized and vulnerable group is portrayed. sometimes it will come from motivated reasoning, where someone already dislikes a thing for subjective reasons and is fishing up Totally Morally Legitimate Reasons for why it's bad and nobody should watch it. sometimes there will be exaggerations of actual unfortunate implications or harmful representation, but blown up way past the actual presence in the thing. sometimes it's "lil nas x made a MUSIC VIDEO where he is MACKING on SATAN!!!!!!!!!!" and you have both conservative christians who are upset by it and gay people who think "he's making the rest of us look bad". sometimes there's a misunderstanding between the creator and their audience. there are so many many reasons of all kinds to label Thing Bad Don't Watch. and if you heed every single warning for Thing Bad without looking into it further, you won't be critically engaging with any media at all. obviously, you don't have to! if something sounds bad you can just choose to avoid it forever. but there's also the kind of people who sort of... list every piece of media as either Acceptable or Unacceptable, and will have deep moral reasonings behind each and every one, even though it often crumbles a bit under scrutiny. i have seen people condemn, say, steven universe, a cartoon for children created by a jewish non-binary person making active efforts to be inclusive, diverse, and challenging. you CAN find ways in which the show has failed to be those things, but where do you draw the line for "this media is unacceptable", while justifying other shows which may not even make the same efforts? that's the place "it's okay to just dislike something" comes from.

and yeah, this is kinda niche and specific, but i see it happen a lot. and it's frustrating, because so many legitimate grievances get lost in the noise, AND most people having those grievances aren't even TRYING to stop people from enjoying things, they just really want to have that conversation. so on the flipside there's absolutely the place where you say "i don't like how this show portrayed X" and people will retort "but you can't stop me from liking it!!!!!!!!!", and that's not a conversation either.

and like... sometimes, what are you even going to do? when people like j k rowling, who have a CONSIDERABLY larger platform than minna, come out as openly and aggressively transphobic, what do you even do? asking everyone to never pick up a harry potter book again is absolutely futile. you can't tell a large part of the population to repress their fond memories of the franchise, even if it's probably soured already. there's even the irony of people who cite harry potter as being one of the series that taught them to be loving, more knowledgeable about oppression, or even something that helped them realize they were queer or trans. nobody really knows How To Deal With This, and there's probably no good answer. you can't make rowling drop her transphobic views by emailing her. you can work on educating people around you about trans rights and how to spot transphobic rhetoric. you can actively choose to never monetarily support her again. you can view the franchise with a new and critical lens and find problematic aspects of her book you missed as a child. you can do a lot of things, or you can not do a lot of things, and there's still going to be transphobes rallying around her and susceptible people converting to bigoted views. you can't make people decide who they listen to. the reason this could even happen to begin with is that there was a cultural context ripe for this specific cocktails of events - it did not happen in a vacuum or out of nowhere, even though it really feels that way.


so again, i dont have a specific conclusion. nobody is immune to propaganda, neither creators nor audience. i think the best we can do is open spaces for conversations and understanding of different viewpoints - and that requires participants to be open to it. not everyone will be. that said, i think this thread is a surprisingly great example of a space just like that.



I want to add a bit to this too. There's actually a video on youtube about this very idea of "do we still enjoy good content even if it's made by people who don't have good views?"

Spoiler: show
As a quick content warning, the video talks about people who have done horrible things, so be warned that it discusses (but doesn't show) child pornography, child rape, and Nazi-ism in the context of "this person has done this thing. Does this affect their works?" Also it's partially about anime (and made by an anime critic) so there's some risque images here and there too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP2KATrNlbE

His ultimate conclusion, for those who don't want to spend 20 minutes watching this, is "it's a complicated topic and no two people are going to have the same answer. But it's also important to know why at least thinking about it matters, because what you spend your money on DOES matter."

Also, this is talking about stuff way beyond what Minna has done, I'm not comparing her to any of the people mentioned in the video linked above. But I do think there's some value to taking the ideas presented in the video and applying them to this situation. Is it okay to like good works if they're made by people with problematic opinions? Is it okay to financially support those opinions and to give the creator a wider platform to spread their message?

I know what my conclusions are for this specific situation (I will keep reading SSSS, but any recommendations to others are going to come with a hefty warning to not read Minna's notes at the bottom of each page, or to read 'Lovely People'. Because while Minna's views are problematic and I don't plan on financially supporting her further, I do genuinely enjoy SSSS and will keep reading it to the end.), but I think there's value in discussing it here too.


Grade E cat

  • Ranger
  • ****
  • Headcanon firing in 3... 2... 1...
  • Preferred pronouns: her
  • Posts: 907
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #590 on: April 23, 2021, 11:03:30 AM »
My main channel for LGBTQ representation in media (the only way my brain seems to be allowing itself to be educated on LGBTQ stuff) also has something about the enjoying the art of problematic creators, for anyone who wants to watch more on the subject.

Spoiler: show

/>
Native: :fr:
So much part of my life it might as well be native: :us:
Few and far between practice opportunities: :es:
A little learned during hardcore anime fan phase: :jp:
Only alternative to English in early junior high school: :de:

Do what cat. Lalli's way of life since age three.

Haiz

  • Admiral of a Sunken Ship
  • ******
    • Tumblr
  • I'M THE BOGKEEP HERE'S YOUR PEAT
  • Preferred pronouns: he/they
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #591 on: April 23, 2021, 11:44:03 AM »
As a side note, I think the only piece of media that I've seen represent Saami people (at all...) has been that Christmas movie on Netflix from a few years ago (Klaus??), but it did seem to be a positive representation so that's something. At least, I thought it was a cute part of the movie.

And about the fat jokes in aRTD, they did make me uncomfortable, as well as the one instance of Hannu using the R slur (I think?). It might have been overlooked at the time of its publishing because aRTD is a pretty old webcomic at this point, and boy was that sort of thing everywhere on the internet back then :(

On the topic of learning about representing a diverse set of people, just based on when Emil said [redacted], Minna seems to be a textbook case of the "I'm making an offensive joke about you to help you!" kind of person. Which is something that I've seen in a lot of white people in rural nordic areas, but also not something that's impossible to step out of even though I've yet to successfully pry anyone out of that mindset myself. I mean, she has said on stream that she enjoys South Park, which in my opinion has singlehandedly set back social justice in America and... Europe, apparently, by an entire decade (hyperbole, somewhat).

Which brings me to Haiz's reply

Spoiler: looooooong reply • show

Yeah, honestly, I realized right after posting it that it might directly sound like I was criticizing your decisions. Sorry, despite what I wrote, I also end up in a cycle of frustration with myself because it is so hard to find work that isn't oddly fetishistic or racist or heteronormative or blah blah list of things that alienate me because of some quality of me as a person. And if it's impossible for even me to find now that I've gotten tired of this kind of thing, how would it be possible for someone who's never (or rarely) had to think of this thing in their entire life? (Not that that's necessarily the case for people on this forum, just in general and in the few periods of time I've been active in fandoms.) So yes, being hypercritical and then smacking everyone upside the head with a "don't read this!" is pretty pointless because, like you said, society isn't accommodating to some groups and the works people produce will reflect that. Like, I've been in this fandom on and off for like, four years now, I've clearly been sitting through some things. That's partially why I took to writing or drawing things for myself alone.

And, obviously, I don't think enjoying a story involving murder should warrant being told that you condone murder. It's good to know where to draw the line with these conversations. I brought up South Park because, well, Minna mentioned it and because for me it represents something way past the line, like if you're laughing at these things in front of me, I would absolutely lose it because racism is so deeply ingrained into the humour of that show that it's impossible to enjoy it without being okay with racism. Somewhere far from there on the spectrum is Minecraft, which has a creator that was either antisemetic or transphobic or both? I can't remember, but the point is, enjoying Minecraft does not require you to be complicit in either of those things. SSSS feels... more like it fits closer to that area because when I first read it, my first thoughts were wow! Fun wilderness adventure! I never got to experience that!

For Harry Potter, as I moved through the books I realized the author did not actually care about those characters of racial minorities or whether or not Dumbledore was gay (I learned of this before I finished it). So, for that, I don't think I have a very valid opinion on the whole problem of forming a deep bond with a story, because I've pretty much always become disillusioned or moved on to read other literature as soon as possible. BUT the fandom was huge at one point, and I have no doubts about the story's cultural impact on youth because of that. Some of it was good, some of it was... not as good, from my experience, but I agree in that there's no absolutely correct way to respond to something like that and I don't think anyone can change that the author has attracted a frankly pretty... bad group of people. What does this mean for us? Well, the discussion going on right now is how we've reacted to Minna being Not Great, and it's been a mostly productive one in my opinion.

But every once in a while, a creator does make something in good faith, and it is worth appreciating! Like, while a lot of characters in Steven Universe are... rocks? (I've never watched it, but I've heard good things about it) they are coded in ways that a lot of kids alienated by other media can relate to. I think the show that I liked most that fits into this category is Utena, which has a trigger warning list that's 500 miles long but otherwise resonated deeply with me, even though it could easily be interpreted in ways that would make the show "problematic" because of just... how many ways you could interpret the many things in the show that warranted that trigger warning list.

What I'm getting from what you're saying, though, is that having a good faith discussion and listening to people negatively affected by this or that show/genre is usually a good way to go about it, and if you do, you'll probably walk away learning more than someone who thinks you're attacking them personally for disliking a show they like. And I don't really have a better solution than that because we all have to enjoy some media sometimes, right? (I do have various hobbies that don't require it and I think that's good, but that's another issue) Personally, I've been able to keep friends more easily when I'm comfortable with discussing these sorts of issues with them, whether we continue to interact with the media itself or not. (that's part of the reason why the concept of "fandom" also alienated me, but that's... also not an issue for this thread :P)


yes, Klaus is one of the very few medias outside of scandinavia that depicts saami people!! they got a young saami girl from tromsø who does not at all speak english to play márgu, which is honestly adorable and fantastic. disney's frozen and frozen 2 also KIND OF portray saami people, albeit under a different name. whether or not it's Good Representation is not up for me to decide and as far as i know, opinions among saami people differ because they're not a monolith and there's so little representation to choose from. REPRESENTATION IS A COMPLEX TOPIC

and yep, hannu does indeed say the R-slur. i reread the comic sometime last year, partially through the physical copy and partially through the online version, as was honestly shocked to not only see it on print, but that nobody had pointed it out in the comment section. WELP!


i don't think i have a lot of clever things to reply to your reply to me, i think we are very much in accordance and i'm just nodding along as i sip my tea.

i really relate to having a difficult relationship with SSSS - it feels like for years, my relationship with it has been facebook status 'it's complicated' as i've tried to reconnect to it, find the parts within it that were and still are important to me, parts that have brought me joy, only to get dissappointed by something in it or its creator afterwards. i think the thing that made it most difficult to enjoy SSSS fully, however, was how HARD it was to bring up these topics before. there would be a LOT of people VERY INTERESTED in shutting down the discussion, handwave all concerns away - actually my first interaction with a SSSS fan online was some guy on tumblr telling me not to worry about it. some other guy on this very forum declared his hate for me in the comfort corner just for bringing up that racism exists and affects everyone in the most lukewarm way i could have. i remember a 13 year old getting sent hate messages for drawing the ssss characters with different skin colors. i don't want to sound spiteful, but the fact that so many of these behaviours happened unchecked and made the fandom unsafe and unwelcoming for people of color is one of the main reasons i no longer felt good interacting with the community, and i'm a white person who was not directly affected by these things. i wish i had been a better ally. the fact that we are able to have these conversations again the way we are having them right now is a GREAT relief, even if circumstances are... kind of depressing. i know it's not a Solution. i know it doesn't make the comics better. but the conversations are happening and i am very glad for that.


To add on Cat’s commentary, in internet discussions there is always the collateral readership. So even if your explanation doesn’t make any difference to the person you are talking to, someone else just reading and not commenting may get something important out of it.

I treasure a memory of explaining herd immunity to an anti-vaxxer (this was long before the current pandemic) who was making some outrageous claims and getting thanked by a by-reader who said they had finally understood and see now why vaccines are important. Usually you don’t get the feedback, but in al, things (public) internet there are more readers than actively engage.

it's absolutely true!!! i too have gotten feedback from collateral readership, thanking me for explaining things even to a thankless participant. i think for a long time, that was one of the things that kept me speaking up and having difficult discussions. until i, uh, burnt out from extending too much good faith on people who were not giving me any back. it's both important to have discussions AND know when to take care of your own self and not to overextend yourself, because the internet is never going to run out of people with awful views and opinions.  for all the arguments i've made just now on the Importance Of Having A Discussion, it's also important to remember there are people who will use your willingness to discuss as a weapon against you, to tire you out, to make you vulnerable. i also want to address that the "duty of discussion" often falls on marginalized groups who have to explain their point of view over and over again without compensation.

... all of this wasn't meant as a counteropinion, just an addition.

I want to add a bit to this too. There's actually a video on youtube about this very idea of "do we still enjoy good content even if it's made by people who don't have good views?"

Spoiler: show
As a quick content warning, the video talks about people who have done horrible things, so be warned that it discusses (but doesn't show) child pornography, child rape, and Nazi-ism in the context of "this person has done this thing. Does this affect their works?" Also it's partially about anime (and made by an anime critic) so there's some risque images here and there too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP2KATrNlbE

His ultimate conclusion, for those who don't want to spend 20 minutes watching this, is "it's a complicated topic and no two people are going to have the same answer. But it's also important to know why at least thinking about it matters, because what you spend your money on DOES matter."

Also, this is talking about stuff way beyond what Minna has done, I'm not comparing her to any of the people mentioned in the video linked above. But I do think there's some value to taking the ideas presented in the video and applying them to this situation. Is it okay to like good works if they're made by people with problematic opinions? Is it okay to financially support those opinions and to give the creator a wider platform to spread their message?

I know what my conclusions are for this specific situation (I will keep reading SSSS, but any recommendations to others are going to come with a hefty warning to not read Minna's notes at the bottom of each page, or to read 'Lovely People'. Because while Minna's views are problematic and I don't plan on financially supporting her further, I do genuinely enjoy SSSS and will keep reading it to the end.), but I think there's value in discussing it here too.



Spoiler: show

thanks for the rec! i love a good video essay, and it sounds like this is one i'm going to find myself nodding along to a lot.

it IS a difficult topic. i definitely have personal limits for what things i find okay and not okay to watch/support, and those limits are going to be different for different people.

it also becomes complicated by the fact that there's different opinions on what IS bad - like from the sounds of it, the examples in the video will be very clear cut cases. but a lot of my frustration often comes from media that, say, depicts queer people, and it gets some things "right" and some things "wrong" and you will have one hell of a headache trying to figure out if the wrong outweights the good or the other way around. sometimes people won't even agree if the wrong is actually wrong.

actually, i will give a rec of my own - there's a podcast called 'the lolita podcast' by jamie loftus, which is a completed deep dive into nabokov's book, the context and circumstances of the book, its adaptions, its effect on pop culture, and its audience. it's really well done and a really nuanced discussion of a really complex topic. it's also a really really tough listen, and it comes with trigger warnings at the beginning of each episode.
(i will also add that every time i recommend this podcast or bring it up as a nuanced analysis of a complicated topic, people start giving me their lolita hot takes and want me to retort to them and i just want to make it clear that No, I Do Not Actually Want To Have A Discussion About Nabokov's Book Lolita Right Now)
« Last Edit: April 23, 2021, 11:52:13 AM by Haiz »
you'll know where to find me.

Vulpes

  • Ranger
  • ****
  • Multa novit vulpes
  • Preferred pronouns: Anything used with affection or respect
  • Posts: 783
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #592 on: April 24, 2021, 09:11:11 AM »
Grade E cat, thanks for that video - the whole channel looks fascinating. As someone trying to navigate LGBTQ+ and race issues sensitively (from a very privileged cis gendered, hetero, white, middle class perspective) it looks like a great resource. That was a really thoughtful analysis, I look forward to looking at some more of the content from the channel. Also now I feel a bit better about my relationship with SSSS; seeing the LP link below the comic still grates, but I can avoid scrolling that far.  ;)
Native: :ca:   Mostly gone: :fr:   A smattering: :de:   Learning!! :fi:

thegreyarea

  • Skald
  • Ruler of a Derelict Airport
  • *
  • Proud Guardian of Cabo Ruivo Seaport (Lisbon)
  • Posts: 1850
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #593 on: April 24, 2021, 11:20:43 AM »
Grade E cat, thanks for that video - the whole channel looks fascinating. As someone trying to navigate LGBTQ+ and race issues sensitively (from a very privileged cis gendered, hetero, white, middle class perspective) it looks like a great resource. That was a really thoughtful analysis, I look forward to looking at some more of the content from the channel. Also now I feel a bit better about my relationship with SSSS; seeing the LP link below the comic still grates, but I can avoid scrolling that far.  ;)
Seconding Vulpes in all the above, Grade E Cat!
(Including the perspective and the irritation with the LP link...)
Chapter break survivor: :chap20: :chap21: :A2chap01: :A2chap02: :A2chap03: :A2chap04: :A2chap05:
Languages: :pt: :br: Capable: :gb: Can read and survive: :es: Knows a bit: :fr: :it:

proud member of the Sigrun Eide for God-Emperor of the Universe Society

groco

  • Super-Newbie
    • Tumblr
  • Preferred pronouns: she/her
  • Posts: 2
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #594 on: April 24, 2021, 02:13:12 PM »
I was catching up with the comic the other day so I’m a little late on the news, and on sharing my thoughts here (first post! first foray!). Reading this forum really helped, most of the disqus and social media comments felt like an echo chamber. Many of you have hit the nail of the head in terms of my own thoughts and concerns, but there’s enough I want to say that I think warrants a post of its own.

When I first read SSSS, I loved how unique it was. The nordic setting and mythology were great. In particular, I thought it was really cool for a Finn to write the world she did. Strong Finnish protagonists in a world where they’re allowed to return to their old gods and culture. It made me happy to see, and I thought maybe these were things Minna might wish to see in the real world as well.

With this recent news, and in looking back and closer at past things, and reading this forum...it’s so hypocritical.

How the Saami were erased and wiped out in the story, when the Nordic countries treat them and other groups like the Romani so horribly. Especially when in the story's universe, the Saami would have had a much higher chance of surviving, thriving, rather than being wiped out. To me, it’s like, you, Finnish Minna, in this universe, can spark new life to and give back the lost traditions of the Finnish, but the Saami aren’t allowed the same? Seriously? I think that’s one clear example of the kind of selfishness Minna possesses, and that she puts into her work. We’ve seen her apathy towards marginalized groups, but thinking about this, really, wow, is like framing it all and stepping back to look at the finished piece.

I thought it was neat of her to write about Finnish culture, in a world undoing the layers of forced assimilation to christian and scandavian culture, but now she’s apart of that oppressive christian culture, and now acts like it is the one being repressed. I am not at all saying converting to christianity is regressive. But reading the themes in SSSS, and then in LP, they clash. Maybe I am giving her too much credit as a Finn to see the truth and recall factual history more clearly than most.

And though she claims SSSS will continue as it was planned, these stark differences in ideologies and pathos make my hope wane, and at the very least, it completely sucks the soul out of SSSS.

I know I will not read any of her future work, and will not financially support her.

Something is very, very wrong with her, but she is sticking her fingers in her ears and barreling ahead with producing work that indoctrinates people into antisemitic, racist, xenophobic conspiracy theories in a “I’m so oppressed” christian echo chamber full of yes-men. So, my empathy wanes.

native: :us:
eh..okay-ish: :de:
learning: :no:
maybe tourist level: :fr:
:A2chap03: :A2chap04: :A2chap05:

Jitter

  • Valkyrie
  • Admiral of a Sunken Ship
  • *
  • JOE guardian, SS Kuru keeper, Finn with some magic
  • Preferred pronouns: She/her, they/their
  • Posts: 4123
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #595 on: April 24, 2021, 02:33:02 PM »
In case anyone’s interested, there’s another comment from Jojusu, who has identified himself as Minna’s father, in the Disqus comments under page 417.
🇫🇮 🇬🇧 🇸🇪 🇫🇷 (🇩🇪)(🇯🇵)((🇨🇳))

:A2chap03: :A2chap04: :A2chap05:

Proud ruler of Joensuu Airport, Admiral of S/S Kuru on the Finnish lake systems. Also the Water Mother.

Engelszorn

  • Super-Newbie
  • Posts: 6
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #596 on: April 24, 2021, 05:12:55 PM »
Uh.. either I am too sleep-deprived or too distracted but I don't understand that posting at all. It's like half of what should have been said is missing and then it takes a sharp turn into politics/conspiracy and... nope. Perhaps somebody else can make sense of that but not me.

PyroDesu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Laudato si ad astra
  • Preferred pronouns: He/They
  • Posts: 24
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #597 on: April 24, 2021, 07:36:19 PM »
For the benefit of the discussion, I'm going to repost the comment here, if that's okay.

Spoiler: show
Quote from: Jojusu
Please forgive me, but I'm going to break the comment section rule and write something about the Lovely People. If you are not interested in my view on the subject, please scroll down to the next comment.

I realise that I don't belong to the primary audience for the Lovely People comic, but in an effort to better understand this community's reactions, I have now re-read the comic several times.

In my opinion the story is very fascinating and it pinpoints on disturbing/scary stuff that is happening in the world right now, in front of our eyes.

On the negative side I find that the story telling is kind of rushed. That is propably the reason why I found it necessary to read the story, think about it, read it again and again. On some details I even had to ask Minna what she really meant (a luxury that you don't have access to). I think that an additional 70 pages or so had been benificiary for bringing forward the comic's whole message.

This leads me to your comments.

The general lack of interest in the two main characters who are NOT Christians is baffling. I mean, an influencer and a teacher, surely there should be tons of interesting stuff to discuss and speculate about their background, education, support network, values, viewpoints, experience of reality etc.

Then there is the third main character, the Christian homemaker, who has stolen the show here. I could write a lot about her but (since I'm lazy) , I will only point to Google, search f. ex. on, "is Chinese government rewriting the Quran, Bible"

I added Quran in the search term because Minna's anger over China's persecution of the Uighurs played a major role in the birth and creation of the LP comic. Before you ask: Yes, Minna knows that Uighurs are Muslims.

I don't want to start any new discussion on this, so please dont feel the need to respond in anyway to my writing. I just felt I had to add some fact based substance to peoples assumptions, speculations and judgements.
BR Jouni Sundberg

"Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible"
The Dalai Lama


My personal opinion regarding it: he completely missed the point of the reaction and critique.

The only part of substance that I can meaningfully respond to is that yes, "there should be tons of interesting stuff to discuss and speculate about [the two main characters who are NOT Christians'] background, education, support network, values, viewpoints, experience of reality etc." Which Minna seemed to deliberately exclude from the comic. In favor of the "Christian homemaker". The show is stolen in the comic itself, not the critique.

Even then, the vast majority of the reaction is to Minna's own writing in the author's notes.

Also, that Dalai Lama quote is very... ironic, considering Minna's actions and words.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2021, 07:46:47 PM by PyroDesu »
Quote from: syvarris
Pyro is probably some experimental government R&D AI.

ChascaKhuno

  • Super-Newbie
  • Preferred pronouns: She/her and they/them
  • Posts: 7
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #598 on: April 24, 2021, 08:49:13 PM »
To @PyroDesu and @Jitter , I would honestly never trust a parent to give an account of their child that isn't incredibly rose-tinted. Proof of that would be how he seemingly ignored the elephant in the room; the author's note. Perhaps that was too difficult to defend, or he was given a version to read without it. Or, perhaps, as many parents are, he is afraid to have a disagreement with his offspring.
I might be reading too much into it, but these were my immediate thoughts on the matter.

Windfighter

  • Ruler of a Derelict Airport
  • *****
    • Tumblr
    • DeviantArt
  • Theologian of the Minnion Church
  • Preferred pronouns: he/they
  • Posts: 1151
Re: Lovely People aka 'the bunny comic'
« Reply #599 on: April 24, 2021, 09:36:50 PM »
bleurgh that comment gave me Feelings and they were Not Good so now I've spent like 3½ hour trying to formulate an answer but I also really don't want to get in an argument ad I'm always wary about posting Deep Shit because words are Hard but I also don't want to just delete what I've written so I'm just gonna post it here instead:

Spoiler: enjoy • show
Here's the thing tho: If Minna wanted to make a point about the Uighurs, she could have made the story actually about muslims instead of erasing them from the narrative and ending it with a note that says everyone should convert to christianity which would also erase muslims.

Instead this comes out as tonedeaf to those who knows what's going on and just adds more fuel to the christians who thinks they're being persecuted because they no longer have the right to put certain groups of people (i.e. queer people, people of color and non-christians) in mental institutions.

With this story Minna efficiently manages to move the focus away from what's going on. Is this what Minna meant to do? We don't know. We only know that she choose to put emphasis on the persecuted christians and the importance of converting instead of what is wrong with Big Brother watching your every move. We are served the conclusion Technology is Bad Actually, when the conclusion should be "People using technology for bad things is bad", even though that opens up a whole other can of worms a la "what exactly is bad" (which, in this place, could have led to some actually interesting and deep discussions)

The shallow story that is LP broke the trust a lot of us had in Minna as a story-teller and a person. She doesn't owe us anything, have no obligation to try and regain our trust, and we are not trying to lay claim on her or her time. She is free to pursue her inspiration and we are happy to see her happy (except the afterword of LP doesn't paint the picture of someone who has found happiness).

As for the characters, which very few of us has been discussing in favor of talking about the theme of the comic and the harsh afterword, the reason the homemaker is the one everyone puts in the spotlight is because the comic itself does that. Everyone else in the comic is just a sidenote so she can spread Christianity. I found Teen-bunny the only valid character in the comic and yet I could tell that teen-bunny's only purpose was to get Teacher to follow Homemaker so Homemaker could force christianity upon her. There is literally nothing to discuss there which is a shame because we know Minna can make compelling characters considering the way we've latched on to a lot of the side-characters in SSSS and aRTD.


-----

And with that I'm gonna be dropping off to bed *flops*
Fluent: :sweden:
Decent: :uk:
Phrases: :spain: / :japan:
:book1+:

My stories frequently features themes such as death, suicide, mourning, etc; I cannot give precise warnings for each individual stories, as it would spoil the intrigues.