*eyes Haiz* Have you ever read Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics? (If you haven't I will totes slip you a digital copy on the fly, everybody who has any interest in comics, graphics, storytelling or anything remotely related needs to read that thing. YOU ESPECIALLY IT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE *dramatic pointing*) Because I don't think it ever actually uses the word "semiotics", but a large portion of the book--and by "book" I mean "long amusing nonfiction comic"--is devoted to describing what semiotics is.
hhHH nooo i haven't actually
pls slip me the digital copy
as for explanation: OH OKAY ThAT KINDA MAKES SENSE
so i guess i know the gist of it!! except i dont know if i could do an analysis in it, because the way our teacher explained it, it was...... you know what, i don't understand even what i remember, there were graphs and you had to identify weird things that were more word-things than art things and it was VERY CONFUSE
anyway I just remembered I posted a Very Relevant thing on this on my facebook wayy back in the previous semester, but I can't seem to find it now. I found some other things I had posted, though:
- don't date a person that thinks rocks are boring
- "you can tell that sculpture is from the archaic period because of the knee caps"
- no haiz the violin bow isnt for fencing
NEVERMIND I FOUND IT AFTER ALL
""for a formal analysis in the strict sense of the word would even have to avoid such exporessions as 'man', 'horse', or 'column', let alone such evaluations as 'the ugly triangle between the legs of Michelangelo's David' or 'the admirable clarification of the joints in a human body'""i don't remember which book this is from. uh, panofsky maybe? anyway it was very funny to me back then
also also I found this photo of my own notes
i'm great at taking notes