Solokov, good luck, and may the grass regenerate well for you! We have the same problem here - 'greenies' down in the city who don't get that if you leave everything to degenerate into a tangle of dead brushwood because of fire bans, it will burn hot enough and widely enough to kill all the wildlife when it does, inevitably, happen.
Here in South Australia we also have a fire-based dry sclerophyll ecology. Many of the plants actually need fire to regenerate from lignotubers, or to germinate their seeds and wipe out soil-borne pathogens, or trigger flowering. Back before white settlement, you got lightning fires often enough to keep things clean. Plus a lot of small wildlife (bandicoots, marsupial mice, bettongs and the like) which are now extinct or endangered, kept the underbrush down enough to ensure 'cooler', less destructive fires. The local Aborigines also practised 'firestick farming', setting small fires in still weather in winter, which cleared small tracts of brush to make open grassland patches between areas of forest, thus encouraging fresh grass for the kangaroos and wallabies they hunted, regrowth of root crops such as lilies, orchids and yam-daisies, while leaving tracts of brush in between for shelter belts.
Since my area has been largely overplanted with 'managed' timber forests, with wilder bits in less accessible terrain labelled 'conservation areas' and left unmanaged, we have had regular destructive wildfires. To give perspective, if you look at a recent fire map of SA, where I live is about equidistant between the sites of the Eden Valley, Pinery and Sampson Flat Fires.
We need better fire management! Sounds like you do too.
