Look University, asbestos removal is all well and good, but you've been removing asbestos from the same area of the same building every single summer since I first got here. You'd think it would not take that many summers to get the stuff out for good. So is asbestos removal just a lot more complicated and tedious than I'm giving it credit for, or have they been putting the asbestos back every year so they can remove it again the next?
Removing asbestos in a way that doesn't violate the current regulations itself is ... tricky. Especially if it's not in neat mats on top of ceiling panels (like at my U), but, say, in the flame retardant covering sprayed onto load-bearing parts (as in the WTC towers). I'ld say that there
might be reasons why the same area needs to be revisited several times, though I can't think one up right now.
I'm reminded of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway in New York City, which has, I think, been under some sort of construction for the past 40 years!
Heavily used buildings/constructs
should be under "some sort of" maintenance pretty much permanently. The German government disagreed with that in the past decades, and we're slowly finding out now just
how many bridges in the nation are approaching, if not beyond, the point of "only thing left to do now is to demolish it and build a new one, amidst the chaos of a traffic breakdown that will cause".
Opposite thing is happening in East Asia, my colleagues who had layover flights in Tokyo said they're everywhere there too. It's like all of the bidets are getting up and migrating over to East Asia. They're literally everywhere here.
I wonder whether it would be possible to sneak a paper on "migrating bidets" into an ornithological journal?