As for inappropriate words or jokes... Unless they are prevalent enough to make reading it unbearable - which I get is not the case - I can overlook them and focus on the bright side.
I think this was the first time Minna's drawn humans (?) and also her first complete comic, so it's nice to see the way their faces are drawn pretty experimentally.(She did the cover art for the Zarkora miniseries (https://www.zarkora.com/) before ARtD, though. Certainly a couple more humans in other covers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minna_Sundberg#Selected_works) and personal artwork (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/gallery.php) as well.)
The interactions between the characters are really good too. Although the dialogue can be a bit stiff in places it's not too bad. Puppyfoxes arrogance comes across right away in his interactions with Hannu and Ville which I find entertaining. He's the kind of character you like to dislike. I also agree with Hannu about Paju. I would also get anxiety if I were around her too long. Although I like how she treats him like he's not a full grown adult.
A couple of possibly interesting points about the Finnish. Puppy-Fox is called he. Or wellm well, hän is gender neutral but it’s the pronoun that in proper Finnish is used of people, and is not used of animals. This is probably because the Foxes speak a bit formally in any case. But then, in the human side, Hannu is called it, se. This is common usage in spoken Finnish but looks weird written, as most of the other vocabulary is not quite as informal.
Another thing is that in the translation, a pun is lost. The word for auroras is in Finnish revontuli, fox fire (fire of fox, would it be fox’s fire? Looks weird). I think the connection to foxes appears in other cultures too, but in Finnish this is the official name of the phenomenon although they may sometimes be called auroras or fires of the north (pohjantuli) or sky fire (taivaan tuli).
So what is in these buns, which have no lactose, nuts, apples, cinnamon, or gluten? Or raisins.
-- any connection between the feast-shy Hannu who runs off to the woods and Lalli?
So what is in these buns, which have no lactose, nuts, apples, cinnamon, or gluten? Or raisins.Well, since they supposedly can cause obesity, there need to be some digestible calories in them. Possibly plain fat (which serves as a flavor amplifier, too).
-- any connection between the feast-shy Hannu who runs off to the woods and Lalli?Hannu doesn't particularly like being outside, and they're very much polar opposites WRT work ethics, so my guess is that they're simply both not very sociable. ("And me", says the donkey ...)
-- "merely a horse's serving"? I would think that a horse's serving would be quite a lot. Is this an idiom in Finnish? (There's an idiom in English 'to eat like a horse', but that means to eat a great deal.)Couldn't find a hint at a Finnish idiom offhand, but could it actually mean "a serving of horse (meat)"? I expect an agricultural society to have workhorses which would get slaughtered and turned into a meal rarily, and certainly not at an age yielding prime meat.
-- I keep expecting a hawk* to show up. But "redtail" here is the fox, isn't it?Most certainly. I mean, who else would be the dreaming "redtail" giving the entire œuvre its title? Ville?
-- I do like the art.Me too, and I'm discovering additional details even now. Like the middle room in the school having a lot of foxes in portraits, as if they have been manning (foxing?) the position of the headmaster before Ms. Tikkanen. Or the address on the envelope (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page28.php) reading "probably somewhere, some country". (Considering that puppy-fox' official name (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/characters.php) is "Pikku-Repolainen", I presume that "Repopost" translates to "fox mail", even though Transgarble refuses to comment on that?)
The foxes calling Puppy Fox and the others (Moose at least is referred to) by “hän” (he/she) works in Finnish too, these animals/animal spirits are clearly persons. But it makes the way Hannu and other humans are called “se” (it) even more conspicuous.Did Ms. Squirrel actually do that? Because apart from her, the only spirit animal in prologue and ch1 who even knew about Hannu and his villagemates is Puppy-Fox, and I bet that HE had to be actively convinced not to refer to most of his fellow spirits that way (as long as someone might hear him) as well ...
Did Ms. Squirrel actually do that? Because apart from her, the only spirit animal in prologue and ch1 who even knew about Hannu and his villagemates is Puppy-Fox, and I bet that HE had to be actively convinced not to refer to most of his fellow spirits that way (as long as someone might hear him) as well ...
Uhhh... I could not stop imagining Ville as a ferret. It's the legs! Snakes do not have legs, and yet snake-ville does? It's such an odd detail that makes me think of him as a dragon instead. And there's also the fur???
You bet it is ... :3Spoiler: up to the end of the story show
Uhhh... I could not stop imagining Ville as a ferret. It's the legs! Snakes do not have legs, and yet snake-ville does? It's such an odd detail that makes me think of him as a dragon instead. And there's also the fur???Took me a while to find this one again ...
As much as I did enjoy the interactions with the villagers, I really start to wonder why he knows everyone so well but also hates interacting with them."Everybody knows everyone else" is standard fare in small villages, whether you like anyone among them or not. Note that the roads out of it seem to have car tracks, but no (wider) bus tracks are to be seen, so getting out of it without having your own car might be nontrivial ...
This was a nice chapter. Hannu was being polite to the old cow
Back to Chapter 2, plowing a field full of vipers was one of Lemmimkäinen’s ordeals in the Kalevala. I also like that about this chapter. And also the fact that apparently it really was the Viper of light (panel 2, page 71) that came for the snakes, and not a mass murder of beings sentient enough to have a religion.I'm not too sure how different that "Viper of Light" is from the very Mr. Viper hanging out
"Everybody knows everyone else" is standard fare in small villages, whether you like anyone among them or not. Note that the roads out of it seem to have car tracks, but no (wider) bus tracks are to be seen, so getting out of it without having your own car might be nontrivial ...Spoiler: moderate one, for entire rest of comic show
I'm not too sure how different that "Viper of Light" is from the very Mr. Viper hanging outwithon Mr. Kuitunen (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/characters.php), given his mode of travel (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page150.php). Some sort of avatars of the same entity, I'd say. I don't want to know how much help he would have offered if Hannu had actually killed all those Ukko-wormshippers ...
JoB, I love dragon Ville :)(Me too. Became the vote bait in Feb-2013 (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page340.php) (Warning: Gore in unrelated comic page above) and held the office for quite a while ...
On JoB’s spoilerSpoiler: show
Spoiler: moderate one, for entire rest of comic show
"Everybody knows everyone else" is standard fare in small villages, whether you like anyone among them or not. Note that the roads out of it seem to have car tracks, but no (wider) bus tracks are to be seen, so getting out of it without having your own car might be nontrivial ...
JoB, you are right about the small villages, although it doesn’t seem to be quite that small - the elderly Kuitunens say they have last met Hannu when he was little, so maybe closer to 20 years ago, or in any case at least 10. It is of course possible they are mistaken, as Hannu seems to know them a little better. Sill, they have a school with several teachers etc, so not quite a tiny village although definitely small enough for it to make sense that Hannu can quickly work out who the leader is in each case.
Spoiler: rest of the comic i think show
It's up to you to decide how much you're willing to believe of the informationSpoiler: rest of the comic i think show
But does this also mean that this could've been avoided if only people weren't gathered?
As someone who lives in a small town in country South Australia (under 1,000 people with most of them living on adjoining small farms, vineyards and in isolated houses on acres), it is a rare occasion when most of the inhabitants are in town at the same time.
In my opinion most of this could've been skipped, but I don't really know how to phrase that. I liked their bonding moments, like I said, and I like that they have to work together to solve the problem, but couldn't they have done it without the fat jokes? Maybe Ville could've been a seal with legs or a… frog or an otter?
It would be entirely possible to say "you are heavy" instead of "you are fat". But no.
It wouldn't make much difference in some cases, because for example I am heavy because I'm fat. But Ville in this chapter is heavy because he was magically transformed into a seal!
Unfortunately some jabs about fat people still happen even in the streams. Not regularly, but it's not something that was left in the 8-year-old practice comic. I am sorry to say.
Generally I dislike fat jokes. I use the term joke very loosely here cause they're not really jokes but fat shaming. I'll usually give a pass to characters like Hannu or Puppy Fox though because they're terrible people. Hannu is not above making fun of people because he's a bad person, that's his personality. Awful. It's in bad taste but for bad people I can see them saying those things. Other more decent characters would not get a pass of course and if Hannu was an actual person he would absolutely get an earful for being mean. Maybe accidentally get pushed out of the boat... but alas he is only fictional.
I am ok with the fact that I am indeed fat, but fat insults ire me greatly. In SSSS there’s also he way Onni calls Mikkel the fat Dane. In that case it’s definitely used as an insult (although Mikkel doesn’t hear it) and cannot be explained as some sort of description or joke, as Onni says it because he’s angry. As if being fat (which Mikkel isn’t at this point in the story) is generally bad. It’s puzzling and disappointing especially as Minna really has realistic body shapes.
OK, so here are my notes on chapter 4:
in which it's made utterly clear that Hannu is a very unpleasant person.
I also find myself wondering whether Minna had, or was fighting not to have, some form of anorexia at the time. But she may just have been hanging out with the sort of high school crowd for which going on about whether somebody (often even including themselves) is "fat" is a near-obsessive form of conversation.
I am glad to see especially you, catbirds, wonder so openly about how much you liked it. Teenagers are probably much more likely to identify with Hannu, as being self-centered and confrontational goes with the age (sorry any current teenagers reading this, but it’s true! Science! Plus it’s an important phase in development of one’s personality). Actually Hannu would work a lot better if he were, say, 16. For a 24-year-old it’s surprising everyone else seems to put up with it.
Also that Oona girl is scary! Actually small children can hurt animals badly by accident, but he doesn’t look small enough for that! And it’s even shown that she does it on purpose and knows it’s wrong. She is not shaping up to become a nice person.
an interesting take on what dogs want. But when I was a child, and we had Old English Sheepdogs, they definitely didn't want me to ride them.It might have to do with the fact that so many dogs today are "mere pets", rather than literal work dogs bred for obedience. Children "riding" a dog seems to have been more common some time ago (including yours truly, though I don't remember any of that myself).
Maybe Ville could've been a seal with legs or a… frog or an otter?I never checked in detail, but with foxes on northern lights duty, lightning-associated adders,
W...ell. I wouldn't exactly call 18/19 years old a kid. She started it in her first year of university
I don't know enough about Minna to speak about her experiences and I wouldn't ever assume anything about it.
I feel like there's somewhat of a stigma on teenagers with the whole belief that they're self-interested to the extreme and overly confrontational, as some kind confirmation bias since you probably only notice the self-centred and confrontational teenagers
-- JoB, your link won't load for me, and tells me that it's because my browser's not up to date, and offers me what it says are links to updated browsers. I'm using an entirely updated version of Firefox; just doublechecked. It's possible that the link's reacting to a selective script blocker that I'm running, but what that usually gets me if it's breaking a site is a notice to turn Javascript on; so I don't know whether something's weird about the site you're linking to and it's trying to get me to download something that's not legitimately one of those browsers.Never mind; apart from a number of comments that don't really add anything, it's a bunch of B+W photos showing kids riding (large-ish) dogs, complete with clearly not-in-our-times kids' clothing.
Maybe I misinterpreted something. I thought I saw something in the comments in which she said she was still in high school; but maybe I misunderstood terminology that's different than in the USA. I don't remember what page it was on; if I come across it again, maybe I'll quote it here and people can sort it out for me.
Sorry if it came off like that! I know and have known teenagers who aren't/weren't like that at all. Like most other things about humans, it varies considerably. I meant more that some people who are like that as teenagers are not like that when they're older; though some take longer to grow out of it than others, some never do, and some people actually become more like that as they get older.
Catbirds, it really is Science! Studies have shown that for example the mental capacity for empathy diminishes during puberty, although it of course returns later and develops further. And the confrontations are required to break free of the symbiotic relationship with the caregivers, most typically parents, but it reflects wider. So, it’s not only confirmation bias, the stereotype based on facts :)
I missed a lot of the angsty teenager phase, I think, both because I had a lot of what most people would nowadays consider adult responsibilities from late childhood on, and because until my midteens I didn’t live anywhere with enough people to have anything like a high school.
And as to older people coming up with equally weird and vile themes: yeah, that happens, sadly. I haven’t seen it so much in my generation, since most people in their 80s have lived through enough real-world trouble to make them a bit more open and tolerant unless they have been really spoiled and sheltered, but the post-war generation seems more inclined to nastiness, especially the men, who were definitely more spoiled and sheltered in the aftermath of WW2, where so many boys were lost.
But living like that either teaches you empathy or turns you into someone who hates everybody. I was lucky enough to avoid the latter, and never learned to hate people!
The latter one indicates that the observed development is indeed a result of several factors, and as the studies I took a cursory look at were heavily concentrated on white, middle class American and European families, it is blatantly obvious my initial claim was very lazy! Thank you for calling me out on it!
The field is fascinating but unfortunately I don’t have time to look any further. This already is enough to show how I have read in something like a magazine or newspaper an article blanketing “teenagers go backwards in empathy” and just swallowed it whole, when the research has indicated white European boys exhibit this.Serves me right :) As if I didn’t already know “people” may as well mean just male people as not.
But -- but -- but -- if you could learn Everything In The World, if it were possible to do that: what would you do the day after, and for the rest of your life?
It would be awful!
I had a similar fear and I still kind of do now that I'm still in the years where you just learn until you "don't."
I am not sure I understand that. What years are those?
I mean, it's hard to quantify knowledge in any case, but generally when people get jobs that are completely draining and repetitive, and maybe they're always in poor working conditions, they don't have their minds on learning or artistic pursuits (not impossible, but it's difficult).I can not imagine that it is possible to do a draining repetitive job without doing something creative or learning something interesting in your free time. In the years I had such a job, times in wich I could not learn something new clearly made me suicidal.
Then there are the people who do some ghastly mechanical slog of a job and at the end of the day write, sing or play amazing music - I have known a lot of those down the years. Plus we have a number of them among the volunteers for our community projects, who live for their volunteer work, which can be incredibly creative. Jobs that keep your family fed are not always the most inspiring things.
I can not imagine that it is possible to do a draining repetitive job without doing something creative or learning something interesting in your free time. In the years I had such a job, times in wich I could not learn something new clearly made me suicidal.
Bright and active minds need to talk, sing and tell stories while so occupied, or go mad. And I have found that logic applies on small non-mechanised farms all over the world, including country Australia.
Workers on the line would sing, talk, and playfully learn bits of one another’s languages, which is where I picked up the fragments of Greek, Italian and Turkish I have. It was very hard, dull and repetitive work, but the interactions kept our minds alive, and I at least learned a lot of useful things.
Nowadays, in a much gentler context, I hold a monthly come-all-ye music night at my house. The next one is going to be this coming Saturday, since South Australia has done so well at controlling Covid that we are now allowed up to 30 people at a private event. I don’t expect anything like that number, but it should still be fun.
And catbirds, it sounds as if you had fun, even if the result was ‘embarrassing’ photos.
And I guess it's here where we establish once and for all that Hannu's just an awful guy! Just an awful guy, which... ok I guess
I guess there's no rhythm to farming with a tractor, maybe? Or no group element? IDK.
I think what bothers me isn't just that he's an awful guy; but that his being awful doesn't seem to be any sort of plot point, or character development, or whatever. It reads more as if this is just what Minna, at least at the time, thought of as normal..
Yeah, he’s just terrible and nobody really seems to mind! I very much like Mr Kuikka here for telling Hannu off. I don’t approve of physical punishment, but I have to say I was all for it when Hannu got snapped by him on p 215.
I think what bothers me isn't just that he's an awful guy; but that his being awful doesn't seem to be any sort of plot point, or character development, or whatever. It reads more as if this is just what Minna, at least at the time, thought of as normal.
The fight scenes are cool, and I like the design of the Moose of Hiisi too! In the real world, Hannu would have died in the avanto, even if he hadn’t already been concussed, but this is not the real world. The way he starts feeling good due to hypothermia is realistic, it eventually causes a sort of euphoria and the person just decides to take a nap in the snow, and never wakes up again.
Oh and moose can swim, and dive, they are very good swimmers and cross open expanses of lakes to get to islands. They also dive for water plants into depths of several meters.
And I tell myself stories while on the tractor, all the time. Or work out plans for the next year. Or think of what I should have said at the planning board meeting. Or occasionally think up a poem. Going in circles on a tractor can be very useful for getting one's head going at some types of thinking.
My music night happened, though with only half a dozen people. We still had fun, lots of good music, talk and storytelling. I made a big pot of vegetable soup as well as roast beef fillet and baked vegetables, Dusty brought along his esky with icecream and berries (I don’t have a working freezer at present, so icecream is a rare treat for us). We had a good feast along with the music. I have so much missed being able to do this every month, and look forward to the end of the pandemic for this among many other reasons!
Oh and moose can swim, and dive, they are very good swimmers and cross open expanses of lakes to get to islands. They also dive for water plants into depths of several meters.
Yup, I've seen those pictures online! And I've always been very shocked. Apparently, one of the moose's main predators is orca whales, which confused many people on the internet because they didn't know moose could swim.Unless I've misunderstood, the moose in the Nordic have to go graze underwater, because plant life on land alone wouldn't provide enough sustenance for such large herbivores to survive the winters up there ...
Always nice to see wildlife while working outside, isn’t it? We have many different birds, ranging from tiny wrens, honeyeaters and silvereyes to big kookaburras, magpies, Australian ravens and mountain jays, plus owls, hawks and the occasional wedgetail eagle.Wow! Australian birds are my favourite. They're so colourful, and some videos uploaded by Australians just show such bright and happy little creatures bouncing around outside. I have two budgies at home and I love them dearly, but of course, I'd love to see all the other birds of Australia.
Star (my husband) likes folk and filk, used to play the dulcimer but not so much any more. He has one of those beautiful dark brown deep singing voices. The others both like general folk, and one of them composes a lot of music for his kids. He and Dusty play a lot of instruments between them and can play some of mine that my damaged hands can no longer manage. Liz has my big harp until my grandkids need it, and I can still play bodhran and small harp. We had fun.Sounds like it. I kind of wish that such community music events were still prioritized in any cultures where it was ever a thing! A lot of my friends learned to play piano and violin only for formal events, which are probably fun, but I just wish we could have a cheerful session of singing and dancing like that.
This chapter is definitely one where I wonder how Hannu is still alive. Unless the snow and the hood were great cushions... those impacts just look like they really hurt.They sure did, but a) that's not his actual body (and if there were a strict correlation between the real and the astral one, the latter could not get more or less injured than the former, which is frozen in time for most of the story), and b) what would happen if he died only in the dream, as he's already headed towards Tuonela along The Birds' Path there, anyway?
I think probably my biggest nitpick with this chapter is the portrayal of ravens and the wanton killing of them at the end. It's one of those animals that I think gets misunderstood because of their appearance, but that's probably just me.Well, those ravens are most definitely not a representation of the average real world raven, but some of the story's villains, including the monologueing about their (modestly) evil (but still perdition-promising, though they probably didn't know that) plans. In both cases, they chose to interfere with the heroes first. (I'm not sure whether we can credit them, rather than Minna / the comic's rating, for Hannu and Ville remaining entirely unharmed by their actions, but that's why I'm not saying that they attacked first.)
They sure did, but a) that's not his actual body (and if there were a strict correlation between the real and the astral one, the latter could not get more or less injured than the former, which is frozen in time for most of the story), and b) what would happen if he died only in the dream, as he's already headed towards Tuonela along The Birds' Path there, anyway?
Well, those ravens are most definitely not a representation of the average real world raven, but some of the story's villains, including the monologueing about their (modestly) evil (but still perdition-promising, though they probably didn't know that) plans. In both cases, they chose to interfere with the heroes first. (I'm not sure whether we can credit them, rather than Minna / the comic's rating, for Hannu and Ville remaining entirely unharmed by their actions, but that's why I'm not saying that they attacked first.)
If you read the comments on those pages, I would have recommended that Hannu instead used death threats against Kurri, or took him hostage, and I still stand by that, but I can't say that I'd consider that that much morally superior ... Hannu and Ville are fighting for their, and others', lives there, after all ...
Uhhhh... yeah. Very concerning, Hannu's kind of just an awful guy here. I don't like it much because at the end, he insists that Tuomi will be fine, but Tuomi is a teenager who thinks no one understands him and Hannu just kind of makes it worse by 1. assaulting him, 2. destroying something important to him, and then 3. possibly drowning him? It's a little Yikes. But hey, if Minna's ultimate goal was to show how terrible Hannu is, then she's been pretty successful by far. I know I cringed at this chapter a few years ago, despite understanding Hannu up until that point.It's certainly a harsh treatment, but if you have a look at the comments, Minna repeatedly confirmed that Tuomi and his human friends, possibly even Pikku Jänis, would have been DEAD if Hannu and Ville hadn't gotten them shoved out the dream pocket's foxhole and back into their real world lives. Add to that that we later see the resurrected people (Paju at least) remembering almost nothing of what had happened ...
I dislike the narrative's attempt to wrap the chapter up by saying Hannu was right or is wiser.That sounds like you assume that Minna wrote the chapter, and particularly that resolution, for the specific purpose of promoting violent solutions to real-life disagreements. If that were the case, I'd wonder why she would've felt necessary to add the other chapters to ARtD ...
Alternatively, I hope this isn't based on Minna's personal experience, on either side of this interaction.Note that Hannu specifically called his approach waterboarding (which it wasn't), in a comic page drawn 2012-ish, relatively shortly after it became a matter of public discussion in the U.S./Iraq context (the ICRC report on its use in Guantanamo was published in 2007, the last publication on interrogators having used a "modified" procedure of their own design came 2014).
I think Puppy-Fox initially meant to use him to get away with his mistake because of his current real-world condition, so if he died it wouldn't have been a big deal.With the usual segregation between humans and the spirit world shown in ARtD, even a living and remembering Hannu (plus all the trips his soul would continue to make on The Birds' Path, from everytime he sleeps to his final transfer to Tuonela) would not have been a serious threat to Puppy-Fox' cover-up. He might have liked coincidally getting rid of Hannu the fast way (which still wouldn't have removed Ville as a surviving witness that the spirits can talk to), and he positively tried to kill them both when he thought his peers might find them red-handed, but he thought out loud (at us readers) that it would take several other spirits in the know to really blow his cover, while only an entire group of out-of-turn-dead humans would, in turn, draw their attention.
But like in Chapter 6, the conflict does add something interesting to the story, even if it feels tangential. I've never heard of any cases of ravens being that deliberately cruel, though. Or that they can actually hurt people? I mean people are so much larger and birds usually have better things to do.Corvids do remember human individuals who mistreated their kind, so "why does that raven keep picking on that one guy!?" scenarios are entirely possible - if the eyewitness is unaware of how the "victim" initially wronged the bird.
It's certainly a harsh treatment, but if you have a look at the comments, Minna repeatedly confirmed that Tuomi and his human friends, possibly even Pikku Jänis, would have been DEAD if Hannu and Ville hadn't gotten them shoved out the dream pocket's foxhole and back into their real world lives. Add to that that we later see the resurrected people (Paju at least) remembering almost nothing of what had happened ...
That sounds like you assume that Minna wrote the chapter, and particularly that resolution, for the specific purpose of promoting violent solutions to real-life disagreements. If that were the case, I'd wonder why she would've felt necessary to add the other chapters to ARtD ...
Speaking of which, I just noticed something: Puppy-Fox handed Hannu and Ville the amulets, which were in the shape of the avatar (or whatever to call it) of some spirit animal that was present in the dream pocket. Simultaneously, he was afraid of the actual spirit animals finding out what he was up to.
It is certainly true that real-world corvids have long memories for people who have wronged them. So do many others of the brighter birds. I have seen it happen with magpies, hawks, keas, other parrots, seagulls and most notably a female plover, who for several years singled out to attack one man among a group, he being the one who had accidentally trampled her nest. Interestingly, she could pick him from the group whether he was in or out of uniform or whether he was wearing hat or sunglasses or not. Birds are often smarter than humans expect.
If I'm understanding it correctly, it's a glimpse at what goes on in Tuonela? Quite different from the most recent depiction of sleeping souls in SSSS.
Huh... can birds recognize faces? I know my birds can recognize me with or without my glasses on, which is pretty fascinating.
If I'm understanding it correctly, it's a glimpse at what goes on in Tuonela? Quite different from the most recent depiction of sleeping souls in SSSS. I wonder what drove Minna to change how she depicted it... maybe Tuuri would just be more convenient in bird form :VI'm certainly not an expert on Finnish mythology, but off the top of my head, I'd guess that ye olden Finns did not spend much thought on what bodily form the dead might have in Tuonela ... the lucky few returning from there in human bodies while everyone needs to be carried there by normal-sized birds does not exactly promise an easy-to-find, contradiction free answer. :3
Uhhh unfortunately "they'd be dead if not for me" doesn't really slide off as a good reason for people to be terrible to someone they helped, but oh well. I don't really think "it's okay to do something that would normally scar a teenager for life as long as they don't remember it" is a great line of thought eitherWell, yes, certainly. If you can come up with less terrible measures (or better reasoning, and all the pondering done within the original strict deadline, of course), be my guest. And yes, I'm aware of the "ticking time bomb" fallacy and willing to comdemn the couple policemen it led to think that the rules would not apply to them and this particular bad guy (looking at you, chief Daschner (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jakob_von_Metzler)). The difference (to me ...) being that Hannu has certainty about the consequences of inaction (as far as a mere human can get from the spirits), and is giving a net gain even to the person he's treating poorly (as apposed to forcing the guy to "take one for the team"). Well, in the case of this one person he treats (particularly) poorly ...
(Besides, I don't think Puppy-Fox ever mentioned that they wouldn't remember any of this)... true. I guess I inferred it from his general impulse to hide his mishap not stopping him from returning the villagers to life, but it's unclear how he'd rate living human witnesses in comparison to fellow spirit ones. (Or dead humans, who apparently still get to talk with The Swan before going into perpetual silence, for that matter.)
Hannu is ultimately rewarded for his poor behaviour and selfishness, what with his parents coddling him and most other villagers tugging their hairs out while he shirks his duties and social obligations in real life. Especially after chapter 6, as I said, the framing of the final scene is that Hannu just imparted some wise advice and his actions in the chapter are fine. But you can also briefly see this right after Mr. Moose's lesson on morality and I think around when Hannu meets the ravens, where he says something along the lines of how he doesn't care about what others say?Sure, Hannu is a questionable person in general, on account of him being one when circumstances do not provide him with excuses to doing so. (Or sufficient motivation not to be.) No contest there.
I think it'd have been nice to just see an instance of how Hannu's actions hurt people (in real life, not in the dream), since if the story was going for a realistic "small village" dynamic, it's impossible for his actions to have not caused harm. Even if Hannu learns nothing from it.His tale of what he used old Pekka's crossbow for did include a shot into Riikka's leg (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page219.php) ... and how "everyone got all angry" about it. (No hint at how old he actually was back then, but he remembers and doesn't seem very sorry about his deed to this day, so ...)
it's hard to wrap your head around why there was a "genuine" Kokko's nest or a "genuine" Tuonela, etc etc...The nest was needed to establish a rapport from inside the dream pocket to Kokko (supposedly the genuine one), to get the task at hand done. It being there isn't any stranger than all the other props being at hand, from the amulets to The Horn Surma Would Run From. IIRC Mr. Bear said that the nest was not the genuine one, but some sort of reflection into the dream.
Huh... can birds recognize faces? I know my birds can recognize me with or without my glasses on, which is pretty fascinating. A lot of animals are very smart, too. Surely they'd also know when people did something kind to them, but considering how humans relied on animals for food or were often violent to them or feared them for diseases, maybe that kind of story's just a lot rarer.I'm not aware offhand of experiments showing that birds can recognize faces, but I do remember that it has been shown that they can find (and use) abstract concepts behind photos they're shown - as in, correctly extrapolate when being shown a new photo. And of course there's a couple birds that passed the Mirror Test (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_test#Birds), thus thought to have a concept of their own identity.
It made no sense to me at all that (among other things) the Swan runs away from Ville, as if Ville could possibly pose any threat to the manifestation of Death itself.It is shown later that the neck wound that Hannu and Ville cooperatively inflicted lingers and forces The Swan to rest, so there's a certain cost (of missing other work) to forcing the issue of Hannu and Ville right away. Pain and panic might also have played a role, if I interpret the Swan's facial expression correctly.
It is shown later that the neck wound that Hannu and Ville cooperatively inflicted lingers and forces The Swan to rest, so there's a certain cost (of missing other work) to forcing the issue of Hannu and Ville right away. Pain and panic might also have played a role, if I interpret the Swan's facial expression correctly.
But why can Hannu and/or Ville wound Death?
And why should Death have been in a panic?Pain and seeing oneself wounded tends to just do that to us humans, even in cases where no grievous harm was done ...
But the Swan isn't human.She's also not anything else I can find a well-researched psychology textbook on. :3
-- I guess I prefer the Swan of SSSS; who is powerful enough that Onni, an adult powerful mage, could clearly have been killed by her with his having no recourse. He talks his way out of it; but there's no sign that he'd have thought it remotely reasonable to attack her, let alone that a random dog could chase her off.So you want The Swan to be impervious to everything Hannu can do, and instead require negotiation skills he doesn't have (and Villes pleading in chapter 6 wasn't very successful, either). Not that that's entirely unlikely to what ultimately happened, but they did have to make it all the way to Kielo's ears to succeed with it ...
does make things kinda weird, especially considering [ch.8 spoiler above] and the fact that Puppy-Fox is a young and immature child in the other animals' eyes, implying recent birth, because doesn't that mean that ultimately the amount of spirit animals will keep growing???The spirit animals have stated (and, at least for the young'uns, finite) ages given on the characters page (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/characters.php). Puppy is several times as old as Little Hare.
Mr. Moose openly admits to "getting old", however that may relate to an actual end of his existence ...
Well, yes, certainly. If you can come up with less terrible measures (or better reasoning, and all the pondering done within the original strict deadline, of course), be my guest. [...]
One of my late aunts who was a wildlife carer and especially liked rearing orphaned native birds, or caring for injured ones, was certainly recognised and remembered by many of the birds she had cared for. I have seen magpies, kookaburras, butcher birds and various corvids that she had cared for and released back into the wild bring back their offspring to show her. The birds would line up their youngsters on the clothesline, tap on the kitchen window to get her attention if she was not already in the garden, and she would come out to them and feed them tiny pieces of raw meat, insects, fruit or seeds, depending on what those particular birds ate, and she would make friends with the young ones. When she died in extreme old age she was found by the young man who had come to cut her hedges, where she had been sitting on the back verandah with her morning cup of tea in her lap and several birds complaining at her feet.
Pain and seeing oneself wounded tends to just do that to us humans, even in cases where no grievous harm was done ...
Anyway, as a continuation of our discussion from last week, it's so weird that he just floats back up to the spirit-dimension-thing and is alive again? So the question of how they exist and die remains, and I have never been the type to ponder magic systems too deeply so... ohhh well.Whatever the details of actual spirit death may be, when the foxes agreed to let Hannu "kill" Puppy, it was perfectly clear that it would not be permanent ("Maybe he'll learn a lesson"). I doubt that they would've let it happen if there were any chance of the mere mortal offing one of theirs for (the greater) good ... Maybe Puppy would have remained in perpetual bodily limbo if his relatives had not vacuumed him back (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page539.php) into their more ethereal realm, but that's moot because they never intended not to.
The ending! I liked the ending, even though it's kinda weird. It's a plot twist that you wouldn't expect, but still kinda makes sense when you get to it, I guess? Well, they're living together now, sure! That does bring more questions about why the spirits allowed it to happen and the implications for how Ville would be counted as a citizen, but on the emotional side, I think it's cute. Hopefully Hannu is nice to Human Ville :3The spirits, all the way down to Kokkos lowest-IQ workforce members, never bat an eyebrow at having to deal with the soul of a dog, who suddenly talks and reasons like a human, as if he were a human. Also, while Astrid did not display the same properties, she was there, in a dream pocket with souls that supposedly had been erroneously carried there by the birds. I don't expect anyone on that side of affairs to suddenly go "wait, what's a dog in a human body even doing here?!?".
Still going to do my best not to think too hard about it, but would that mean some are way older than or have a longer lifespan than others? Kokko, for instance, seems to be nigh eternal. They're both ancient, yet Kokko makes no mention of "getting old" beyond being wiser, meaning he improves somewhat with age?The characters page puts every spirit other than Puppy and Little Hare as "ancient". Nonetheless, their antics - especially Ms. Squirrel's - make it very clear that there still are major age/maturity differences between them. ("Mind your elders, punk! (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page150.php)") And sure, if they have a finite life expectancy, it may well differ between (apparent) species ...