The Stand Still, Stay Silent Fan-Forum

Worlds and Stories => SSSS & ARTD Board => Topic started by: Nimphy on September 06, 2014, 01:32:36 PM

Title: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 06, 2014, 01:32:36 PM
The SSSS Wiki is alivee!!! (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Stand_Still,_Stay_Silent_Wiki) So I thought it would be a good idea to declare the "how about it?" topic dead, and open this new one. This is for all suggestions and discussions related to the wikia. Me and Solovei are the admins. I just added a couple of cool things (slider on the main page and achievements), but feel free to suggest more! I'll start off with a couple of points:

- Most Achievements are the standard ones wikia offers, but I can customize them. Any suggestions for funny SSSS-related titles and images? In this moment I remember various achievements for editing, posting photos, organizing in categories, joining, blogging, and messaging a fellow member. There are lots more, though.

- There are still lots of articles to be written, too many to keep count. That risks being a scary thing. What articles would be the most immediately needed?

Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 06, 2014, 06:32:10 PM
The slider looks really cool! I may mess around with the layout and stuff just to make it look better...

The big article I can see us needing is one about the Rash Illness since it kind of gives the reason for the entire plot... possibly more technology articles too, but so far all we really know about is the Dalahasten (sorry, I don't know how to make the accented a's on my keyboard! T_T)  - though that was an awesome article, good job to whoever wrote that one!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 06, 2014, 06:41:54 PM
The slider looks really cool! I may mess around with the layout and stuff just to make it look better...

The big article I can see us needing is one about the Rash Illness since it kind of gives the reason for the entire plot... possibly more technology articles too, but so far all we really know about is the Dalahasten (sorry, I don't know how to make the accented a's on my keyboard! T_T)  - though that was an awesome article, good job to whoever wrote that one!

Thanks. It's the only article I've touched so far, so I'm starting to feel a bit possessive towards it :P
I'd love to make it even better or possibly contribute with some other articles, but too many irl projects and assignments have been piling up right now.

As for ¨ the button should be to the left of your enter button.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 06, 2014, 06:46:53 PM
Thanks. It's the only article I've touched so far, so I'm starting to feel a bit possessive towards it :P
I'd love to make it even better or possibly contribute with some other articles, but too many irl projects and assignments have been piling up right now.

As for ¨ the button should be to the left of your enter button.

It's what I consider to be the best article in all the wiki :)

Well, your keyboard may be different. Mine doesn't have umlauts or whatchamacallits at all.

The slider looks really cool! I may mess around with the layout and stuff just to make it look better...

The big article I can see us needing is one about the Rash Illness since it kind of gives the reason for the entire plot... possibly more technology articles too, but so far all we really know about is the Dalahasten (sorry, I don't know how to make the accented a's on my keyboard! T_T)  - though that was an awesome article, good job to whoever wrote that one!

While you're messing around with the layout, could you perchance make a wordmark to resemble the SSSS logo? Or should I do it myself?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Eich on September 06, 2014, 07:31:37 PM
I'll go ahead and lock the other wiki thread.  It's all coming together pretty well, and I saw that link to the forum, too ;)

Is it safe to assume that this will be the debugging place for debuggy things to happen?
If so, then here's two small things I found:
    There's an ad at the top of the front page that pushes everything down a bit too much.
    The word "site" under Tuuri's picture on her page is missing a "t."
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 06, 2014, 07:35:13 PM
    There's an ad at the top of the front page that pushes everything down a bit too much.

Yeah, I was planning to work on that. Hopefully I will be able to do it without breaking the entire front page~ :D I don't know if I could get rid of the ad, but I might be able to make the gallery slideshow thingy a bit narrower?
 
It's what I consider to be the best article in all the wiki :)

While you're messing around with the layout, could you perchance make a wordmark to resemble the SSSS logo? Or should I do it myself?
A wordmark? You mean like a logo?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 06, 2014, 07:39:21 PM
Yeah, I was planning to work on that. Hopefully I will be able to do it without breaking the entire front page~ :D
 A wordmark? You mean like a logo?

Oh, you'll take care of that? Good, I may sleep in peace :D

The wordmark is the thing that reads "Stand Still, Stay Silent Wiki" in the top-left corner. But maybe customizing it is a founder-only thing? Meh, you know what, I'll do it tomorrow. I already have a couple of ideas, anyway.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 06, 2014, 07:52:07 PM
I looked around and yeah, it doesn't seem like I'm able to edit that part.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 07, 2014, 05:41:33 AM
I looked around and yeah, it doesn't seem like I'm able to edit that part.

I did it! It's rather amateur-ish, but I spent over an hour on it, so it'll have to do.

EDIT: after spending another hour on it, it seems the site won't accept a .jpg file. I think I'll just let it like it is...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 07, 2014, 08:47:18 AM
I'm not mad or anything, but whoever edited a word on the new "cleansers" article accidentally made me lose about 300 words of article about the cleansing process  :P

Lesson learned: Save edits often.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 07, 2014, 08:51:15 AM
I'm not mad or anything, but whoever edited a word on the new "cleansers" article accidentally made me lose about 500 words of article about the cleansing process  :P

Lesson learned: Save edits often.

Three people editing that article... I'll just stick to editing Emil. (And no, not me, I haven't edited anything yet. I was about to.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Logical Psycho on September 07, 2014, 10:14:06 AM
Well, your keyboard may be different. Mine doesn't have umlauts or whatchamacallits at all.

What's the language setting of your keyboard?
[start -> (settings ->) control panel -> (Clock and) Regional and Language options -> keyboards and languages -> change keyboards].

My keyboard is set at United States - International, which allows for easy use of umlauts etc.
So ' + e is é; `+ u is ù; " + a is ä.. And all other sign/vowel combinations.



Anyyyyway, that's an aside. Good luck wikiing  :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 07, 2014, 12:48:10 PM
whoever edited a word on the new "cleansers" article accidentally made me lose about 300 words of article about the cleansing process  :P
That seems to have been me, sorry. I would've thought that a Wiki software, explicitly encouraging "minor" edits, would have some failsafe against such effects, very much like this forum warning you about posting when someone else posted to the same topic in the meantime ...

In case that there's some workaround to be found (there doesn't seem to be a matching FAQ on Wikias "Community Central"), what exactly was the effect when you tried posting the new version? Did you try to use your browser's "back" button to return to the text as edited by you?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 07, 2014, 01:10:09 PM
I think I'm going to move the "Recently Changed Pages" link out of the menu, since I wanted to fit more categories in there... Is that Ok with everyone? You can still see the activity list on the front page and also in the sidebar of most pages.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 07, 2014, 01:34:00 PM
I think I'm going to move the "Recently Changed Pages" link out of the menu, since I wanted to fit more categories in there... Is that Ok with everyone? You can still see the activity list on the front page and also in the sidebar of most pages.

Of course, not like there's no other way of discovering recent changes.
! :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 07, 2014, 01:41:22 PM
I was also thinking about what category to put pages like "Clensers" and "The First Rule" and the Mages article (which I haven't written yet but I will)... basically everything that aren't characters or locations or creatures. Maybe something like Terminology? Or World? Something... Anyone else have any ideas?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 07, 2014, 02:04:56 PM
I was also thinking about what category to put pages like "Clensers" and "The First Rule" and the Mages article (which I haven't written yet but I will)... basically everything that aren't characters or locations or creatures. Maybe something like Terminology? Or World? Something... Anyone else have any ideas?

Cleansers and Mages could be Professions. The First Rule... World, I guess? Or terminology, or general. Or we could wait if there's a second rule. Or info pages. Dunno, your choice.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 07, 2014, 02:11:46 PM
Question to all:

Should we keep this page now that we have separate pages for all of the people on it?
http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Secondary_Characters

If not, I'm going to go ahead and delete it just so people don't get confused.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 07, 2014, 02:21:14 PM
Question to all:

Should we keep this page now that we have separate pages for all of the people on it?
http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Secondary_Characters

If not, I'm going to go ahead and delete it just so people don't get confused.

As soon as I can (the computer was taken by the troll disguised as a little sister), I'll add other secondary characters to that. People like no-money-lady and Agneta. :D
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 07, 2014, 02:25:06 PM
As soon as I can (the computer was taken by the troll disguised as a little sister), I'll add other secondary characters to that. People like no-money-lady and Agneta. :D

Don't forget Unflappable Train Guy!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 07, 2014, 02:59:43 PM
I think I'm going to move the "Recently Changed Pages" link out of the menu, since I wanted to fit more categories in there... Is that Ok with everyone?
Speaking of categories, I have not yet found a method to see a list of all (possibly entirely uncategorized) pages - like "The Rash" and "The Illness", which I just added -, only the total count of pages mocking me from the homepage. :( Any hint that I may have missed ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 07, 2014, 03:04:51 PM
Speaking of categories, I have not yet found a method to see a list of all (possibly entirely uncategorized) pages - like "The Rash" and "The Illness", which I just added -, only the total count of pages mocking me from the homepage. :( Any hint that I may have missed ... ?

There is a function, actually, but I don't remember it. I'll try and find it and put it in the navbar.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 07, 2014, 03:13:11 PM
Speaking of categories, I have not yet found a method to see a list of all (possibly entirely uncategorized) pages - like "The Rash" and "The Illness", which I just added -, only the total count of pages mocking me from the homepage. :( Any hint that I may have missed ... ?

I don't know if this will work for people who aren't admins, but this is a list of all pages currently on the wiki:
http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 07, 2014, 03:31:18 PM
http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages
Ah yes, the "Special:" namespace - thanks, it works for me, too!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 08, 2014, 02:40:44 PM
So, quick question. Does anyone know why the "page does not exist" thing that shows up when you hover over a dead internal link is in... is that german? Dutch? Swedish?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 08, 2014, 04:02:36 PM
So, quick question. Does anyone know why the "page does not exist" thing that shows up when you hover over a dead internal link is in... is that german? Dutch? Swedish?

Is it? It turns out in English for me.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 08, 2014, 04:21:58 PM
So, quick question. Does anyone know why the "page does not exist" thing that shows up when you hover over a dead internal link is in... is that german? Dutch? Swedish?
It says "TARGET_NAME (Seite nicht vorhanden)" for me, which is German, which I never selected in any properties of the wiki. I'ld guess that the language is autoselected from the browsers's language preferences (where I have set German to the topmost priority).

For Firefox, open Preferences, go to "Content" tab, and click "Choose ..." next to "Languages" to open the appropriate config window.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 08, 2014, 04:44:08 PM
It says "TARGET_NAME (Seite nicht vorhanden)" for me, which is German, which I never selected in any properties of the wiki. I'ld guess that the language is autoselected from the browsers's language preferences (where I have set German to the topmost priority).

For Firefox, open Preferences, go to "Content" tab, and click "Choose ..." next to "Languages" to open the appropriate config window.

I have mine set to English which is why I thought this was weird... It's not a huge deal, I suppose! What worries me more is the on-going difference between the number of pages quoted on the front page and the ones that show up in Special:AllPages... I did a quick google search on what might be causing it, and was given two solutions:
1. Clear your browser cache - did that, didn't work. Also tried it on my tablet which has the same thing happening.
2. Wait it out, since it's just wikia's servers being slow.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 09, 2014, 05:09:42 AM
What worries me more is the on-going difference between the number of pages quoted on the front page and the ones that show up in Special:AllPages...
Muh ... ? Claims 31 for me right now, and AllPages lists 31 pages and one Redirect ("Main Page", to "Stand Still, Stay Silent Wiki") ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 09, 2014, 12:52:34 PM
I don't know if others have this problem, too, but I noticed that some recently edited pages do not appear in the 'recently edited' list, at least not immediately. I'll give it a look and see if anything can be done.

Meanwhile, I've been rereading the comic and I'm about to set on a pretty long edit on the various characters' pages, so I'd ask everyone not to make any edits right now, for a couple of hours at most.

Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 11, 2014, 07:24:35 AM
Job, about the timber cruiser (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/The_Timbercruiser): Are you sure it's not one of the currently existing ships of Viking Lines? A quick google search yielded several similar ships. I would link one of the images but wikipedia seems to be down at the moment.

The part about the ship being modified by the Norwegians, is that from Minna herself? It seems kind of strange for them to move it all the way over to the other side of Scandinavia.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Pessi on September 11, 2014, 07:41:05 AM
Job, about the timber cruiser (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/The_Timbercruiser): Are you sure it's not one of the currently existing ships of Viking Lines? A quick google search yielded several similar ships.

Actually it looks a lot like M/S Gabriella (https://www.vikingline.fi/fi/suomi/valitse-matka/laivat/ms-gabriella/)

Quote
The part about the ship being modified by the Norwegians, is that from Minna herself? It seems kind of strange for them to move it all the way over to the other side of Scandinavia.

Perhaps the shipwrights themselves came over and modified the ship on the Baltic see? It could well be that there is no sufficient know-how left in Finland or Sweden to manage such a big project.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 11, 2014, 08:01:37 AM
Actually it looks a lot like M/S Garbriella (https://www.vikingline.fi/fi/suomi/valitse-matka/laivat/ms-gabriella/)

Perhaps the shipwrights themselves came over and modified the ship on the Baltic see? It could well be that there is no sufficient know-how left in Finland or Sweden to manage such a big project.

Know-how is one thing but to to actually re-engineer the ship with carved out hull sides, additional superstructure and a massive prow they would need much heavier machinery than what they seem to have in Pori and Björköfjärden.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 11, 2014, 11:01:02 AM
Job, about the timber cruiser (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/The_Timbercruiser): Are you sure it's not one of the currently existing ships of Viking Lines? A quick google search yielded several similar ships. I would link one of the images but wikipedia seems to be down at the moment.
We had a discussion about the existing Viking Line fleet back when the Timbercruiser appeared in the comic, from placement of the actual logo (midships, rather unusual for the current fleet) to specific ships being proposed (most prominently the Gabrielle). What killed all those speculations dead in the water was when the Paddlewheeler drew near and got swallowed whole hauled through a rather small-ish hole in the hull.

Most existing Viking Line ships are ro-ro ferries with a single car deck, and their largest are in the 100-150 meters (length) range IIRC. The Paddlewheeler has a length of 20 m as an absolute minimum, so there's no way that the Timbercruiser has less than 200 m.

The part about the ship being modified by the Norwegians, is that from Minna herself? It seems kind of strange for them to move it all the way over to the other side of Scandinavia.
Quote Minnas comment on page 92 (sorry, haven't found out how to make a link to a specific Disqus comment yet), re: the Timbercruiser's dragon figurehead: "... the Norwegians are the ones ruling the whole ship building/repairing industry, and they like their little viking ornaments. This particular ship ..."

EDIT: FWIW, this cruiser is flat out way too large to have been operating solely in the Baltic Sea pre-Rash. I'ld guess that it's a hypothetical Atlantic (passenger) cruise ship of the Viking Line that was near the Norwegian coast in the first place when the apocalypse hit, and got remodeled to carry the most unwieldy goods at hand (timber from Finland and Sweden to the West, and large pieces of scrap metal on the way back to the ironworks in Luleå), simply because that's the only thing that'll ever fill it in the low-population post-apoc world.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 11, 2014, 04:12:41 PM
Should we categorize Vellamo et. al. as "creatures", or make a new category for them? If the latter, should that be "Gods", "Gods and Mythologicals", "Religion", ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 11, 2014, 04:28:53 PM
Things like political organisation, religion and such could perhaps sort under a "society" category.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 11, 2014, 04:34:26 PM
Things like political organisation, religion and such could perhaps sort under a "society" category.

I had meant to make a page called "The Old Gods" and provide some info on there. We did use to have (not sure if it's still there) a "world" category which I intended to be for like, general world-building related information. They could go there.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 11, 2014, 04:43:21 PM
About Aurland (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Aurland). It's true that the placement of the large star icon on the map (http://sssscomic.com/comic.php?page=66) suggests that the settlement lies further inland than the actual, real world Aurland town, possibly all the way up to Årdalstangen. But - the star icon itself does not locate capitals accurately, just look at Mora which is miles away from its actual location and Bornholm which is in the middle of open sea. So I'm not sure we should speculate too much about its location.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Firecrow91 on September 11, 2014, 08:01:00 PM
Hey, just wanted to throw this on here, but any opinions on accentless redirects? I've been doing a bit of editing on the wiki, and I've already gotten plenty annoyed at my boring old english keyboard when trying to search for Björköfjärden, for example. If we have Bjorkofjarden redirect to Björköfjärden, it would show up in search autocomplete and make it a lot easier for English-speaking folk to get around the wiki.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 11, 2014, 08:27:18 PM
About Aurland (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Aurland). It's true that the placement of the large star icon on the map (http://sssscomic.com/comic.php?page=66) suggests that the settlement lies further inland than the actual, real world Aurland town, possibly all the way up to Årdalstangen. But - the star icon itself does not locate capitals accurately, just look at Mora which is miles away from its actual location and Bornholm which is in the middle of open sea. So I'm not sure we should speculate too much about its location.
Hmmmmm, point, but. Someone commented that the dotted circle for Höfn, Iceland, suggested that its inhabitants have unexpectedly grown gills ;) and Minna seemed embarrassed, so it's not like she intended the markup to wind up way off the actual locations ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 11, 2014, 08:47:13 PM
Hey, just wanted to throw this on here, but any opinions on accentless redirects? I've been doing a bit of editing on the wiki, and I've already gotten plenty annoyed at my boring old english keyboard when trying to search for Björköfjärden, for example. If we have Bjorkofjarden redirect to Björköfjärden, it would show up in search autocomplete and make it a lot easier for English-speaking folk to get around the wiki.
I'm very much in favor, and created the "Bjorkofjarden" redirect to see how to enter redirects in the first place. You create a "new page" with the desired name, and instead of entering text, you open the three-horizontal-bars menu, select the first item (called "Seiteneinstellungen" for me - "page properties"?), tick the "redirection" checkbox, and enter the name of the target page.

One word of caution, though: When you create links on a page and type ASCII-only up to and beyond the first differing character, autocompletion will show and save a link to the accentless version, which will then display a page with the "Redirected from ..." blemish near the top. That'd be sloppy work IMHO. :-[

I'll withhold creating more redirects 'til this discussion has reached a consensus, though.

By the way, when you select the "categories" tab in the same menu, you get an additional text field controlling how the page shall be put in sorted lists. As far as I can tell, the sort order is already correct for the Nordic alphabets (special characters following after "Z") ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 11, 2014, 11:50:37 PM
As someone with an english keyboard, I absolutely welcome the idea of the accentless re-directs. I'll pop over and have a look at how they work in a second! Let me know if you need help with it.

EDIT: also, do you guys know if it's possible to link to a section of an internal page? Like, if I want a link to go to one of the prologue characters, if I put in the actual URL (such as blahblahblah/Prologue_Characters#Arni), it treats it as an external link... any way around that?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Lenny on September 12, 2014, 12:54:20 AM
Ah, just chipping in here to give a hint about keyboards: If you don't have one with accents (actually, I had no idea there were keyboards with accented letters), set your keyboard layout to U.S. International. It's got a whole series of shortcuts that give the accents you need (listed here (http://www.muhlenberg.edu/main/academics/llc/web_resources/Windows/US-intl.html)). I've been using it for years.

That's if you have a Windows computer, of course. I've no idea about Macs or Linux.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 12, 2014, 07:15:26 AM
I've no idea about Macs or Linux.
You don't want to know what one can do with the xmodmap command on unixoid machines running an X11-based GUI. ;)

Today's nigh-infallible Swiss pocket knife to posting weird characters in fora is to bookmark pertinent pages (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_alphabet#Alphabet) and use the mouse to copy-paste them from one browser window/tab into another. There are only two de facto standard character sets in the history of the WWW, the original ISO-Latin-1 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO-8859-1#Languages_with_complete_coverage) and the current Unicode, as opposed to the myriad charsets that some machine's OS might have set as default.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 12, 2014, 08:50:15 AM
You don't want to know what one can do with the xmodmap command on unixoid machines running an X11-based GUI. ;)

Today's nigh-infallible Swiss pocket knife to posting weird characters in fora is to bookmark pertinent pages (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_alphabet#Alphabet) and use the mouse to copy-paste them from one browser window/tab into another. There are only two de facto standard character sets in the history of the WWW, the original ISO-Latin-1 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO-8859-1#Languages_with_complete_coverage) and the current Unicode, as opposed to the myriad charsets that some machine's OS might have set as default.

Windows comes with a digital display keyboard, maybe there is a way to install a Scandinavian version of it if it lacks the necessary icons. If we could install a addon to the forum adding buttons for certain characters that would be even better though.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Lenny on September 12, 2014, 09:44:56 AM
You don't want to know what one can do with the xmodmap command on unixoid machines running an X11-based GUI. ;)

Today's nigh-infallible Swiss pocket knife to posting weird characters in fora is to bookmark pertinent pages (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_alphabet#Alphabet) and use the mouse to copy-paste them from one browser window/tab into another. There are only two de facto standard character sets in the history of the WWW, the original ISO-Latin-1 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO-8859-1#Languages_with_complete_coverage) and the current Unicode, as opposed to the myriad charsets that some machine's OS might have set as default.


Urgh, I may want to sometime (not because of actual want, just a quick skim on articles about it makes my very fatigued inner voice go "Does it really need to be this involved?", rather because of need). Depends how far I actually get into computers. I'm leaning towards gaming design/programming at the moment, rather than actually working with computers themselves, but it might change depending on how much I like doing the network setup course I'm doing atm. I tend to go all the way if I get hooked on something.

I suppose it shows how tired I've been that I didn't think of that problem myself (even without significant knowledge on the subject it should be obvious with a bit of thought, haha...). Windows would use Windows-1252, I'm assuming. I usually only use accented characters for communication (the amount of websites I frequent and/or edit that use accented characters in urls, or anything at all, is negligible at best), and the Swiss pocket knife method is time consuming when you want to type the essay/email/chat message quickly... changing the layout to U.S. International is best for that use, I've found.

Ooof, you know, by following those links, I now have 10 tabs open on articles on all sorts of things. Read through each at least twice. I was planning to sleep early today, haha... ah well, learnt new things! Which I'm also going to research more on, this is quite interesting. But not now ;) Put off sleep long enough.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 13, 2014, 06:40:20 AM
As someone with an english keyboard, I absolutely welcome the idea of the accentless re-directs. I'll pop over and have a look at how they work in a second! Let me know if you need help with it.

EDIT: also, do you guys know if it's possible to link to a section of an internal page? Like, if I want a link to go to one of the prologue characters, if I put in the actual URL (such as blahblahblah/Prologue_Characters#Arni), it treats it as an external link... any way around that?
Wikia seems to use the "#" as an escape char for some special trickery, too, so likely no.

I guess I'll have to take the lack of naysaying as a "go" for the accentless page redirects. ;)

In a similar vein, I noticed that searching the wiki for, e.g., "Thor" does not turn up, e.g., Árnis entry on the Prologue Characters page. I couldn't find anything about adding keywords or invisible text to Wikia pages so as to allow accentless text "redirects", anyone got an idea short of going for outright localization (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words#Miscellaneous) (which would IIUC entail that the accentless version might become the displayed one)?

EDIT: I just made a redirection page, no less, named "Arni Thor Reynisson" and redirecting to "Prologue Characters#Árni Þór Reynisson" - and it works as documented (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Wikitext/link_examples#Internal_links). Must've been the "blahblahblah/" part that gummed up the works in your test. (Not feasible to use redirection pages for every accentless name for a keyword/section we might want to have, though, I'm afraid.)

EDIT 2: To edit a redirect, use it once (which will display the target page), then click the link in the "redirected from ..." inserted at the target page's top. (Which effectively appends a "?redirect=no" to the URL.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 13, 2014, 06:03:52 PM
Wikia seems to use the "#" as an escape char for some special trickery, too, so likely no.

I guess I'll have to take the lack of naysaying as a "go" for the accentless page redirects. ;)

In a similar vein, I noticed that searching the wiki for, e.g., "Thor" does not turn up, e.g., Árnis entry on the Prologue Characters page. I couldn't find anything about adding keywords or invisible text to Wikia pages so as to allow accentless text "redirects", anyone got an idea short of going for outright localization (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words#Miscellaneous) (which would IIUC entail that the accentless version might become the displayed one)?

EDIT: I just made a redirection page, no less, named "Arni Thor Reynisson" and redirecting to "Prologue Characters#Árni Þór Reynisson" - and it works as documented (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Wikitext/link_examples#Internal_links). Must've been the "blahblahblah/" part that gummed up the works in your test. (Not feasible to use redirection pages for every accentless name for a keyword/section we might want to have, though, I'm afraid.)

EDIT 2: To edit a redirect, use it once (which will display the target page), then click the link in the "redirected from ..." inserted at the target page's top. (Which effectively appends a "?redirect=no" to the URL.)

Hmmm, I think I see how it worked with Arni's entry at least, but are we going to make those for every single character and entry that has accented characters in it? That will probably unnecessarily inflate our page count and will probably be tedious and confusing.  I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, I just wanted to know the extent of this...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 13, 2014, 06:24:11 PM
That will probably unnecessarily inflate our page count and will probably be tedious and confusing.  I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, I just wanted to know the extent of this...
Redirects aren't included in the official page count (as shown on the entry page), but they are listed (in italics) among the "All Pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages)".

We currently have 11 pages (out of 53) with accented characters in their title. As for section( title)s with accented characters ... IIRC only for the secondary characters, and that's 12 right now. Those could drown out the actual pages in the long run, I suppose.

I just notice that searching for "Thor" still doesn't provide a match leading to Árni, in spite of the redirect in presence, so those fail to serve the intended purpose, anyway. :( (Searching for "Bjorkofjarden" does turn up the redirect to "Björköfjärden" - WTH!?) I'll leave it there for the moment, in case we want to run some more tests, though.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 13, 2014, 06:48:49 PM
You seem to be vastly more qualified for this than I am, JoB XD
But, even if the secondary character thing doesn't work, do you want me to make redirects for all the other accented pages?

EDIT: Okay, I made one for the Dalahästen! I think I did it right... If you search for just "Dalahasten", it has the "redirected from..." thing in the results, which I guess means it worked?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 13, 2014, 08:14:04 PM
You seem to be vastly more qualified for this than I am, JoB XD
For the little tech snags, maybe. Not so in terms of time (I get sent out to external projects occasionally), human interaction, etc., I'm afraid.

EDIT: Okay, I made one for the Dalahästen! I think I did it right... If you search for just "Dalahasten", it has the "redirected from..." thing in the results, which I guess means it worked?
Yeah, I guess that that's what it means. (EDIT EDIT: Congrats, you made all ten still-missing ones. :P )
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 13, 2014, 10:12:52 PM
I'm also going to make a wordmark/logo for the top, I know Nimphy was going to for a while but I thought I'd give it a shot. I'll make several versions and post them here so people can say which one they like best.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 14, 2014, 06:04:29 AM
Totally different question: I've seen the question of "Y no survivors from heeeeere!?" raised (and answered) on the forum (again) and am thinking about writing a summary that we can just link to in the future. That would, of course, not be just a collection of in-story facts, but at least partially an opinion piece. Should that be made into a Wikia article, and if yes, what should the category be ("FAQs"? "Discussions"? "Opinions"?)? Or should I rather try giving the Wikia User's Blog feature a spin?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 14, 2014, 06:41:17 AM
Why not make an article about the comic itself and add it as a subsection. For instance, you could add a premise or concept section where you include what Minna has stated about that particular issue so far:

Quote
Ehh, I wanted to write a Nordic postapocalyptic story, and therefore I've established survival lines and story concepts that let me do that. Not really trying to discriminate against Anglophones or anything.

Oh, and this info is useful too.

Quote
I'll eventually make an illustrated chart of the most common professions in each category, but peasants is mostly farmers, (food)hunters, fishers and craftsmen, while academics are the properly educated people like doctors, skalds (historians) scholars(scientists and researchers), mechanics and politicians. And military is pretty self-explanatory.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 14, 2014, 11:54:54 AM
Why not make an article about the comic itself and add it as a subsection.
Hmmm, hmm, hmmmm. With the kinda rant I have brewing in the back of my mind, I'm really not sure whether that'll work out proportion-wise. A bit like introducing an ant 'cause it's on-topic, and then trying to slip the elephant into its pocket. ;)

Also, some of the points are about what Minna possibly could do in the future that are not only not canon now, but not even rumoured about ...

(I guess I'll do some "duh" blog post today and find out about their technical properties - can they be edited? by whom? etc. -, maybe that'll make the route to go clearer already.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 14, 2014, 12:39:16 PM
Hmmm, hmm, hmmmm. With the kinda rant I have brewing in the back of my mind, I'm really not sure whether that'll work out proportion-wise. A bit like introducing an ant 'cause it's on-topic, and then trying to slip the elephant into its pocket. ;)

A speculations article then? Or several if you're really going to go all out.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 14, 2014, 08:50:33 PM
I remember something in the rules about theories and speculation... here, I think?
http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Nimphy_I/The_Stand_Still,_Stay_Silent_Wiki_is_alive!!
Personally I'd rather keep speculations out of the wiki, and reserve it for things we KNOW through canon (the comic)... an FAQ could be helpful but again, I don't want to overstep our boundaries.

Also, I wanted to get your opinions on this: http://maps.wikia.com/wiki/Maps_Wiki?utm_source=General&utm_medium=Social%20Media&utm_campaign=Hootsuite

It seems to be a well-suited addition to the wiki, given how many maps we already have floating around. I haven't played with it yet, BUT there's also that custom SSSS google map that some amazing people on the forum and myself have put together (it's stickied in the other discussion board), so I'd love to be able to share that on the wiki somehow as well. Maybe embed it somehow?

Still working on the wordmarks/logo images. It's been a while since I've done graphic design so I'm a bit rusty. Here's a couple possible ones I did so far:
(http://i.imgur.com/s8xspEe.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/iewMfMq.png)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 15, 2014, 07:15:38 AM
I remember something in the rules about theories and speculation... here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Nimphy_I/The_Stand_Still,_Stay_Silent_Wiki_is_alive!!), I think?

Personally I'd rather keep speculations out of the wiki, and reserve it for things we KNOW through canon (the comic)... an FAQ could be helpful but again, I don't want to overstep our boundaries.
Indeed, it says right there that there should be no speculations in articles ...

... time for me to summarize what I found out about wiki users' blog entries, then. They appear on the wiki's "recent blog posts" for a while, the long-term access mode is to look at the list of the specific user's blog posts. They can be edited, but only by their author, plus they have the same comments mechanism as articles do. Last not least, you need to be careful about the title, because the URL of a blog post includes that (just like with article titles).

(Here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:JoB2/Making_Accented_Non-Title_Texts_Findable_Accentlessly)'s my guinea pig, FWIW. With infos about accentless searches for texts other than page titles.)

Sounds like a suitable vehicle for personal opinions to me, but there is still the possibility that The Rules' use of the term "article" (56 on the SSSS Wikia so far) is intended to cover all types of pages (364, says the magic counter (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2#Testing_Grounds)), of course ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 15, 2014, 03:20:08 PM
Indeed, it says right there that there should be no speculations in articles ...

... time for me to summarize what I found out about wiki users' blog entries, then. They appear on the wiki's "recent blog posts" for a while, the long-term access mode is to look at the list of the specific user's blog posts. They can be edited, but only by their author, plus they have the same comments mechanism as articles do. Last not least, you need to be careful about the title, because the URL of a blog post includes that (just like with article titles).

(Here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:JoB2/Making_Accented_Non-Title_Texts_Findable_Accentlessly)'s my guinea pig, FWIW. With infos about accentless searches for texts other than page titles.)

Sounds like a suitable vehicle for personal opinions to me, but there is still the possibility that The Rules' use of the term "article" (56 on the SSSS Wikia so far) is intended to cover all types of pages (364, says the magic counter (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2#Testing_Grounds)), of course ... ?

Oh, sorry! I guess I misunderstood. Go ahead and put that in a blog post then, if you want.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on September 20, 2014, 04:17:07 PM
Should we eventually add pages on the paper versions of the books? I feel like we should, but I don't know. Something like "these are the books that have come out 'till now, this is what's in them and this is what they look like."
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 20, 2014, 05:20:04 PM
Should we eventually add pages on the paper versions of the books? I feel like we should, but I don't know. Something like "these are the books that have come out 'till now, this is what's in them and this is what they look like."

This also seems to belong in a general article about the comic.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 20, 2014, 06:03:41 PM
Should we eventually add pages on the paper versions of the books? I feel like we should, but I don't know. Something like "these are the books that have come out 'till now, this is what's in them and this is what they look like."
Well, I already put a book-by-book superstructure on the detailed list of the comic's contents (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Table_of_Contents) and I still think that the books would merit their own article(s) ...

(BTW 1: Does anyone have a good idea where to put links to that and the list of special pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Table_of_Special_Pages)? I'm not quite sure how to get them off the list of orphaned pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:LonelyPages) ...)

BTW 2: I put two posts about technical possibilities onto the wiki blog (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Blog:Recent_posts). Should I better post that kind of stuff over here?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on September 20, 2014, 06:25:18 PM
Well, I already put a book-by-book superstructure on the detailed list of the comic's contents (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Table_of_Contents) and I still think that the books would merit their own article(s) ...

(BTW 1: Does anyone have a good idea where to put links to that and the list of special pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Table_of_Special_Pages)? I'm not quite sure how to get them off the list of orphaned pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:LonelyPages) ...)

BTW 2: I put two posts about technical possibilities onto the wiki blog (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Blog:Recent_posts). Should I better post that kind of stuff over here?

The Table of Contents is great, but maybe a little long for spesific information, so yeah.
I was also thinking of adding a category called "about the comic" or "outside the 4th wall" or something for things like this.
And, yeah. Having all discussion in one place is probably better as long as it doesn't outgrow the thread too much.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 20, 2014, 06:46:19 PM
I was also thinking of adding a category called "about the comic" or "outside the 4th wall" or something for things like this.
I introduced a category "Story, Plot Points, Artwork" today, specifically to have a category to put images like the chapter titles or the one of the V/S Þór?? gunning down the refugee ship into ...

Having all discussion in one place is probably better as long as it doesn't outgrow the thread too much.
Alright then, let me "move" the two main points here:

Code: [Select]
<div style="height:0px; font-size:1pt; color: rgb(246,230,193); color: rgba(246,230,193,0.0);">(Accentless: Arni Thor Reynisson)</div>
(The RGB values should be kept matching our pages' standard background color, and "Arni Thor Reynisson" is the accentless version of the search term(s) we tested the whole thing with.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 21, 2014, 03:01:05 AM
Relating to the issue of having a page about the comic, I added some general info (update schedule, when the comic started, etc) to the front page a little while ago. I suppose as more information becomes available (and the books are released) we should add more.

Mostly my concern is driving traffic away from Minna's site (and hiveworks, I guess, I'm not sure exactly how it works with ad revenue and such) by having the wiki replicate too much of the stuff that's found on the comic's site... does that make sense?
Title: More wiki help?
Post by: Sunflower on September 21, 2014, 03:53:43 AM
Hello, all.  I just made my first visit to the wiki and am very impressed.
Can you use an extra pair of hands?  I'm new to Wikia software, but I've used similar programs at work (and *once* did some editing to Wikipedia). 

I'm a writer/editor by trade, so I'm happy to make a proofreading pass over the pages and fix the occasional typo.... if you consider that a priority.  (I honed my standards in the marketing field, where literature touting million-dollar software packages had to be flawless.  But I realize labors of love like this may not call for such an obsessive-compulsive attitude.)

Or if there's a particular topic/type of resource where you think the wiki needs work, I'm happy to direct my energies there.  Just let me know at your leisure. 

BTW, I notice the wiki pages load quite slowly in my browser, especially when I have other windows open (e.g. a YouTube page playing music).  Might that have something to do with the streaming video ads on the page, or something else about Wikia?  Or is it just a coincidental problem with my (rather narrow) Web bandwidth?
Title: Re: More wiki help?
Post by: JoB on September 21, 2014, 05:36:14 AM
Can you use an extra pair of hands?
IIUC Wikis, by choice, don't have a lot of tools to keep you out even if we wanted to ... ;)

BTW, I notice the wiki pages load quite slowly in my browser, especially when I have other windows open (e.g. a YouTube page playing music).  Might that have something to do with the streaming video ads on the page, or something else about Wikia?  Or is it just a coincidental problem with my (rather narrow) Web bandwidth?
Cannot say that I've seen a great many wikis, but Wikia does have a fair lot of doodads installed beyond the basic MediaWiki software. As far as I've seen the pages' HTML, there's far more bytes to be transferred for the menus, CSS etc. than for the actual content - not that that's entirely unkown from "web design" ...
Title: Re: More wiki help?
Post by: Sunflower on September 21, 2014, 06:22:43 PM
IIUC Wikis, by choice, don't have a lot of tools to keep you out even if we wanted to ... ;)


True.  I probably should have been more specific:  Is there any particular task/subject where you'd like more help?  The wiki looks great so far; maybe I should just hush and let your crew carry on...
Title: Re: More wiki help?
Post by: Solovei on September 21, 2014, 06:39:15 PM
True.  I probably should have been more specific:  Is there any particular task/subject where you'd like more help?  The wiki looks great so far; maybe I should just hush and let your crew carry on...

We appreciate the help! So far I think we've kind of... wiki'd ourselves into a corner in that everything we know so far is represented fairly well. We'll have to wait until the start of Chapter 4 tomorrow (eeeeeeee so excited!) to see if there's anything that needs to be added...

Although, I've been thinking about putting together a guide on writing wiki articles... Like, how/when to link pages together, the style, sections you need to include... You and I can work on that together if you'd like?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 23, 2014, 08:42:05 AM
We appreciate the help! So far I think we've kind of... wiki'd ourselves into a corner in that everything we know so far is represented fairly well. We'll have to wait until the start of Chapter 4 tomorrow (eeeeeeee so excited!) to see if there's anything that needs to be added...

Although, I've been thinking about putting together a guide on writing wiki articles... Like, how/when to link pages together, the style, sections you need to include... You and I can work on that together if you'd like?

I saw that guide, mind if I add something or do you wish to do it yourself?

I had thought we'd wikied ourselves into a corner long ago, but strangely I kept receiving emails on all sorts of articles. I was thinking, as there are many cities which will probably not be important to the immediate plot, we could gather all the ones where our characters haven't been in just a page?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 23, 2014, 10:18:50 AM
I saw that guide, mind if I add something or do you wish to do it yourself?

By all means! :) I don't mind.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 23, 2014, 12:35:46 PM
I had thought we'd wikied ourselves into a corner long ago, but strangely I kept receiving emails on all sorts of articles. I was thinking, as there are many cities which will probably not be important to the immediate plot, we could gather all the ones where our characters haven't been in just a page?
I wouldn't call it "into a corner" as much as "pretty much caught up" ...

The past week or so, I've been not so much creating new pages but fixing technicalities, taking the wiki's special pages (as "bookmarked" here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2#My_Quick_Links)) as starting points. I guess that's where the mails came from.

Concerning "less important" locations, what exactly would you want to write about them? If all that's desired is to have a list of them unless they have their own page, making them into "redlinks" on the respective country page - as they are right now - and looking at the corresponding special page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WantedPages) does that rather well IMHO.

(And while we're discussing a style guide (haven't read that yet): IIUC making keywords where one thinks "that should become a page of its own eventually" into such redlinks is how people should implicitly maintain a content to-do list, isn't it?)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 23, 2014, 12:43:15 PM
(And while we're discussing a style guide (haven't read that yet): [...])
P.S.: The part on (not) modifying images doesn't exempt resizing, which I've done sometimes with the purpose of complying to the "not too much detail" idea. OK or not?

(Next technicality on to-do list: Catch up with my uploaded images not having had their copyright statement set until I noticed that option recently.)

(Edit: Done. Weird. The magic on my user page says that the wiki has "396 pages (62 articles), 105 files, 1,066 edits, 23,610,834 users (11 active, 2 admins)", yet I got the "Lucky 2,000th Edit" badge ...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 23, 2014, 01:22:04 PM
Ummmmmhh I guess the "no editing" part means NOPE for this one (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sweden.jpg) ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 23, 2014, 01:47:42 PM
Ummmmmhh I guess the "no editing" part means NOPE for this one (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sweden.jpg) ... ?

Oh, yeah, nope. I don't see why should we modify the comic itself, and it's not our decision to make.


Concerning "less important" locations, what exactly would you want to write about them? 

(And while we're discussing a style guide (haven't read that yet): IIUC making keywords where one thinks "that should become a page of its own eventually" into such redlinks is how people should implicitly maintain a content to-do list, isn't it?)


Nothing, that's it was it you writing the cities pages? I'm pretty sure it was you. As they're things that are not important to the comic in the immediate plot and stuff, I was thinking of having a cities list with information on eqch entry instead of having a page for each city (after all, a lot of them have only a few lines of text, because little info has been given).

Errr... Don't think so, but whatever. Do as you like, as long as they don't remain redlinks forever.

Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 23, 2014, 03:00:53 PM
Oh, yeah, nope. I don't see why should we modify the comic itself, and it's not our decision to make.
OK, it's replaced now. Page 117 had a no-bubble view of landscape with Swedish flags. That leaves Norway as the only country with no readily recognizable symbol available from the comic yet. (Iceland and, interestingly enough, Finland had maps matching their pre-Rash outlines, and Mora and the Öresundsbro base had panoramic views with flying colors.)

was it you writing the cities pages? I'm pretty sure it was you.
I wrote a number of pages for cities, but it was someone else inserting lists of all known settlements with (Red)links into the country pages.

Errr... Don't think so, but whatever. Do as you like, as long as they don't remain redlinks forever.
One of the advantages of having them hang around and be listed as Redlinks is that you can easily find out which pages have such a Redlink on them - and, say, relink to a "List of Boringhams" page if they don't get "fixed" in a timely manner. ;)

Most of the information on settlements the protagonists haven't been to yet is drawn from the World Map, hence they're quite literally nothing but a name of the map yet, presumably until the storyline somehow involves them. Should we name a point where we'll give up and amalgamate them into a bland list? When the expedition is out in nowhere land? Or until after the first "flashback" to the Known Lands, to see whether Minna is willing to include more backstory into them than the events immediately affecting the team?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on September 26, 2014, 08:44:58 AM
Someone should add a page for admiral Shouty Olsen.  :P
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 26, 2014, 10:00:05 AM
Someone should add a page for admiral Shouty Olsen.  :P

I'll put him on the Secondary Characters page  :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 26, 2014, 10:21:06 AM
I'll put him on the Secondary Characters page  :)
I have a hunch he'll be yelling at you for this debasement! ;)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 26, 2014, 11:56:05 AM
I have a hunch he'll be yelling at you for this debasement! ;)

I was half-tempted to write his entire entry in capitals.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 26, 2014, 12:03:59 PM
I was half-tempted to write his entire entry in capitals.

I'd be willing to look the other way if you do as long as the article title is Admiral "All-Caps" Olsen.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 26, 2014, 01:39:28 PM
I was half-tempted to write his entire entry in capitals.
Well there are ways to do that in a perfectly legal way (http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_font_font-variant.asp).
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 26, 2014, 02:45:11 PM
Well there are ways to do that in a perfectly legal way (http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_font_font-variant.asp).

This actually goes back to what I was wondering way back when we were first setting up the Wiki, which is - how much can you change regarding the layout and colors and whatever? Like, is it possible make an external CSS sheet and link it it to the wiki? Or are you confined by Wikia's layout but can change small things like fonts and colors?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 26, 2014, 06:33:25 PM
Is there a way to view the statistics of all the articles, like their total size and word count, number of crosslinks and so forth? It would be sort of useful when trying to get an overview of articles that might require work.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 27, 2014, 01:32:44 PM
This actually goes back to what I was wondering way back when we were first setting up the Wiki, which is - how much can you change regarding the layout and colors and whatever? Like, is it possible make an external CSS sheet and link it it to the wiki? Or are you confined by Wikia's layout but can change small things like fonts and colors?
If I remember correctly what I glanced when I brushed the Wikia help pages, then the specific Wikia's set of CSS are up to its admins to edit. Vewwy Cawefuwwy, of course. ;)

(Which sort of brings us back to the technical suggestions/questions I "ported" from the Wikia blog to this thread; The open question about searchable accentless versions of keywords is whether we can implant support into the CSS, and the suggestion about putting the CharInsert extension to use to allow everyone to easily "type" Nordic special characters IIUC would need to go into the Wikia's templates ...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 27, 2014, 05:34:11 PM
Is there a way to view the statistics of all the articles, like their total size and word count, number of crosslinks and so forth? It would be sort of useful when trying to get an overview of articles that might require work.
Almost forgot to (try to) answer this one ...

There's a bunch of Special Pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:SpecialPages), including "Long Pages", "Short Pages" (both in Bytes), "Dead-end Pages", and "Orphaned Pages" (zero outgoing/incoming Wikia-internal links), but not a detailed statistic of all pages, as far as I can tell.

There don't seem to be relevant "magic" markup (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words) to include such data into the respective page, either ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on September 28, 2014, 10:44:09 AM
This actually goes back to what I was wondering way back when we were first setting up the Wiki, which is - how much can you change regarding the layout and colors and whatever? Like, is it possible make an external CSS sheet and link it it to the wiki? Or are you confined by Wikia's layout but can change small things like fonts and colors?

I can change wikia's layout, at least for colors and backgrounds and stuff, but only I can. I settled on a standard design mimicking SSSS's color theme for the moment, but suggestions are welcome.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 28, 2014, 03:59:41 PM
I can change wikia's layout, at least for colors and backgrounds and stuff
Hmmm. You're obviously referring to the Theme Designer (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Theme_designer). According to the Admin Dashboard Help Page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Admin_Dashboard), you should also have a link there taking you to an outright outright editor for the Wikia CSS (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Editing_Special:CSS). Also, there's a list of CSS and JS files (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:JavaScript_and_CSS_Cheatsheet) that can be modified.

Which is, needless to say, not of much use until we have a better idea of what we might want to change there. ;)

Solovei, as to your question about what we can do with that, there's a limit besides the technical one in that Wikia has set up a policy (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Customization_policy) on what you may or may not do.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 28, 2014, 04:36:29 PM
... bleh. I had a harder look at the Wikia and for the CharInsert extension (quick reminder: To allow people with plain ASCII on their keyboards to insert Nordic characters into edit windows by mouse click).

The good news is: The extension is not only installed and active, it is actually preconfigured on this page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:Edittools) - which I am not allowed to edit. When you look at the actual source, you see a large block of "Latin-X" characters already entered, but commented out - as it sits between
Quote
<!-- Extra characters, hidden by default
and
Quote
-->

In a nutshell, making a selection of characters we need and putting them into a new <span> outside the comment should do the trick.

The bad news is that this useful extra is obviously unavailable in the VisualEditor and the Classic Editor's Graphical Mode; you have to switch the Classic Editor to Source Code Mode, then clicking "more" will pop it up. :(
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 28, 2014, 05:00:57 PM
Ah, I believe we discussed granting admin rights to core contributors in the previous thread. I suppose giving JoB (or JoB2 rather) administrator access would be a good start.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 28, 2014, 05:55:08 PM
A-haaa! Finally some success (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:ASCII) - if the full text search cache, after its next update, shows the matched text portion for Arni the way I expect it to. Phew. Took long enough. :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 29, 2014, 08:01:23 AM
if the full text search cache, after its next update, shows the matched text portion for Arni the way I expect it to.
Aaaand check (see attached screenshot)!

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 29, 2014, 08:31:31 AM
... which promptly raises the next questions: a) Does someone know the correct transcription of the Nordic characters into ASCII, and b) supposed they're not obvious (I'ld fully expect some people who've never seen Icelandic to transcribe "Þór" as "Dor" or "Por" instead of "Thor"), do we want to provide the correct, the dummy-ese, or both?

Ice: Áá Ðð Éé Íí Óó Úú Ýý Þþ Ææ Öö
Den&Nor: Ææ Øø Åå
very formal Nor: Ææ Øø Åå é è ê ó ò â ô
Swe&Fin: Åå Ää Öö
very formal Fin: Åå Ää Öö Šš Žž
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 29, 2014, 11:03:14 AM
very formal Nor: Ææ Øø Åå é è ê ó ò â ô

I don't get this, what's formal about it and are all those lower case letters meant to be Norwegian characters?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 29, 2014, 11:30:35 AM
I don't get this, what's formal about it and are all those lower case letters meant to be Norwegian characters?
Info taken straight from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_orthography#Diacritics) ...

(OK, calling it "formal" might be incorrect. It's the Wikipedia page on the Finnish alphabet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_orthography) mentioning that "in practice, only highly formal sources such as official texts, encyclopedias or Helsingin Sanomat use them.")
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 29, 2014, 12:35:44 PM
I mightn't be able to understand word one from them, but it seems that the native counterparts confirm the two Finnish extra characters (http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomen_kielen_aakkoset) as well as the use of at least the acute and grave accent in Norwegian (http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Det_dansk-norske_alfabetet) ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on September 29, 2014, 02:57:11 PM
I don't get this, what's formal about it and are all those lower case letters meant to be Norwegian characters?

I know at least some of them are used. I use é myself quite often and I know the letter ô is supposed to be used in at least one word (fôr). Though it's formal because very few people actually use them.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on September 29, 2014, 04:47:29 PM
I mightn't be able to understand word one from them, but it seems that the native counterparts confirm the two Finnish extra characters (http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomen_kielen_aakkoset) as well as the use of at least the acute and grave accent in Norwegian (http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Det_dansk-norske_alfabetet) ...

Ah, but these are not individual alphabetic letters, they are diacritical accent marks and are used in English too (with the exception of the circumflex, which I really believe has only one application in the entire Norwegian non-loan word lexicon). That's not entirely the same as Icelandic Á and Swedish Ö which are not found in English and are always regarded as separate letters with distinct phonetic realisations compared to their derivatives.

Also there's not really any point in creating an artificial distinction between the Danish alphabet and the Norwegian because they are identical also with regard to diacriticals.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 29, 2014, 05:54:25 PM
Ah, but these are not individual alphabetic letters, they are diacritical accent marks
Hm ...

The current subtopics are a) how to transcribe terms with accented letters into pure ASCII, and b) (lower priority) which accented characters to maybe include into our CharInsert config so as to allow people to "type" terms with correct accented letters, not to come with the ultimate definition of a Nordic language's alphabet. I'm under the impression that in both these areas, we should err on the side of inclusion ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on September 30, 2014, 12:28:06 AM
I just wanted to thank whoever wrote the languages article, it's very nice! That graph is also very well done.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on September 30, 2014, 07:38:44 AM
I just wanted to thank whoever wrote the languages article, it's very nice! That graph is also very well done.
Thanks, it suddenly occured to me that that buncha facts ought to be spelled out on its own page (before, say, the editors of the characters' pages sprinkle it every which way). I am still puzzled where to put links to it, though. ::)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 01, 2014, 03:55:40 PM
Did we break Wikia's newest and bestest (the VisualEditor), or has it been disabled globally? :-/
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on October 01, 2014, 04:53:16 PM
Did we break Wikia's newest and bestest (the VisualEditor), or has it been disabled globally? :-/

I can still access visual editor ...  did you mean that some newer edition of visual editor is inaccessible or are you totally consigned to the source editor?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 02, 2014, 08:58:56 AM
I can still access visual editor ...  did you mean that some newer edition of visual editor is inaccessible or are you totally consigned to the source editor?
I'm hitting the normal "Edit" button and instead of bringing up the VisualEditor, I get the Classic Edito (in visual mode).

Then again, I'm restricted to an older browser the last couple days ... will try with the other one when I get a round tuit.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 02, 2014, 11:46:32 AM
Then again, I'm restricted to an older browser the last couple days ... will try with the other one when I get a round tuit.
Yup, it was a reaction to the aged browser. Forget I said anything. ::)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on October 04, 2014, 08:15:37 AM
Yup, it was a reaction to the aged browser. Forget I said anything. ::)

Nah, you'll never live this down.

I was thinking (somehow), the front page looks a little bit hodgepodge. The slider thing is great, but maybe we could consider getting some sort of organised layout for it. I was thinking something similar (but not necessarily identical) to this wiki's layout (http://www.mariowiki.com/) could be viable.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 04, 2014, 09:17:55 AM
maybe we could consider getting some sort of organised layout for it. I was thinking something similar (but not necessarily identical) to this wiki's layout (http://www.mariowiki.com/) could be viable.
Heh. That one's based on the "Monobook" style that they want supplanted with "Wikias new Look" (see selection box on the first tab of your user settings), isn't it? :D
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 04, 2014, 10:49:20 AM
I too have been thinking about cleaning up the front page, but I'm kind of scared to screw it up beyond recognition.

The biggest problem I see to changing the layout is that ad that shows up. Normally it wouldn't be too hard to work around it, but the box for it seems to vary in length depending on exactly what ad comes up, which makes it really hard to ensure that it won't spontaneously push all the stuff down and leave a giant blank space.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 06, 2014, 06:43:44 PM
Umh, Solovei? You are aware that a) renaming the page to something else than "The Cat-tank" will leave a redirection under that name, requiring admin intervention to actually erase it, and b) the Nordic council logo has five points while the expedition logo has six, yes ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 07, 2014, 10:22:15 AM
Umh, Solovei? You are aware that a) renaming the page to something else than "The Cat-tank" will leave a redirection under that name, requiring admin intervention to actually erase it, and b) the Nordic council logo has five points while the expedition logo has six, yes ... ?
Oh, does it? Hmm. I hadn't considered that. I do feel like we need a page for it and I wasn't sure what else to call it. I'll sort out the redirection thing with my admin powers, don't worry.

Yeessss, there is some difference, but it's still incorporated into the design. Someone on the comments (I think) said the sixth, empty shape was for the Silent World.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 07, 2014, 12:25:51 PM
Oh, does it? Hmm. I hadn't considered that. I do feel like we need a page for it and I wasn't sure what else to call it. I'll sort out the redirection thing with my admin powers, don't worry.
Alright, techdata bomb run scheduled for this eve ... :P

Someone on the comments (I think) said the sixth, empty shape was for the Silent World.
That has been one of the two most popular theories in the comments ever since we've seen the Nordic Council symbol (the other being that there's one tip for each crew member, and the hollow one being Braidy), but the cat-tank showing the six-points symbol with the flags' colors is the first thing to officially suggest they're as much as related ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 08, 2014, 10:00:30 AM
I'll sort out the redirection thing with my admin powers, don't worry.
Speaking of that, could you please overpower the redirection named "Arni Thor Reynisson" and pointing to Arnis entry in the Prologue Characters page?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 08, 2014, 10:03:40 AM
Speaking of that, could you please overpower the redirection named "Arni Thor Reynisson" and pointing to Arnis entry in the Prologue Characters page?

Sure!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 10, 2014, 12:57:12 PM
I wanted to get everyone's opinion on this: do the Oresundsbro Base and the Oresund Bridge need separate pages? Or should the bridge be described as a feature of the base. I'm thinking given the fact that it existed pre-rash, it can stand to be on it's own, but plot-wise they kind of go together, so... I'm not sure.

Also, the Cat-tank page is currently orphaned! Can anyone add some links to it from other pages? It has a lot of links out but not any links in.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on October 10, 2014, 01:52:15 PM
I wanted to get everyone's opinion on this: do the Oresundsbro Base and the Oresund Bridge need separate pages? Or should the bridge be described as a feature of the base. I'm thinking given the fact that it existed pre-rash, it can stand to be on it's own, but plot-wise they kind of go together, so... I'm not sure.

Also, the Cat-tank page is currently orphaned! Can anyone add some links to it from other pages? It has a lot of links out but not any links in.

I'd like fewer and bigger articles (not sure why), but I think your argument for creating a separate article is convincing. I suppose we'll see how much of the bridge we get to see, but if I know JoB he'll manage to spin a small essay out of whatever we get.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 10, 2014, 08:35:46 PM
I wanted to get everyone's opinion on this: do the Oresundsbro Base and the Oresund Bridge need separate pages? Or should the bridge be described as a feature of the base. I'm thinking given the fact that it existed pre-rash, it can stand to be on it's own, but plot-wise they kind of go together, so... I'm not sure.
As of today, the actual bridge is connected to a tunnel (that Minna already confirmed to still be in existence and operation in year 90) on the artificial island of Peberholm, that resurfaces near the Copenhagen airport, which might be the derelict airport seen in the other team "photo"; all of these features might not only happen to have a relevant pre-Rash history but also a during-Danish-reconquest-attempts history, yadda yadda, possibly leading to a page way longer than the one on the base - where, as it turns out, we have only the here and now to report.

I might be infamous for inflating minuscule pages into PhD theses, but if nobody were to create said pages beforehand, I'ld prefer to delay such decisions until the storyline telegraphs "alright we're done with this item for the moment". ::)

Also, the Cat-tank page is currently orphaned! Can anyone add some links to it from other pages? It has a lot of links out but not any links in.
It is not (confirms the relevant special page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:LonelyPages)), at least the Öresundsbro Base article links to it. (Added one from "Plot Outline", though. More links from "Table of Contents" and/or "Table of Special Pages" will likely follow.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 22, 2014, 08:42:26 PM
We seem to have a new contributor on the Wiki with, ummh ... IMHO mixed results. On one hand, I like the "Characters" template (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Characters) and the use of "location" infoboxes fine and will have a look at expanding those ideas to other categories when time permits. On the other hand, we now have a "Dalahästen giant (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Dalah%C3%A4sten_giant)" page essentially narrating the scene, with a lot of not-quite-factual detail, another page on "Scandinavia (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Scandinavia)" and how the meaning has supposedly changed post-Rash, and a bunch of added redirections to existing pages a la "Tuuri" -> "Tuuri Hotakainen" or "Troll" -> "Trolls". (Middle ground provided by adding a category "Giants" besides "Creatures" and renaming a couple pages so as to remove the leading article.)

Would someone like to play second (actually third and counting) opinion there ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Sunflower on October 23, 2014, 12:10:52 AM
As of today, the actual bridge is connected to a tunnel (that Minna already confirmed to still be in existence and operation in year 90) on the artificial island of Peberholm, that resurfaces near the Copenhagen airport, which might be the derelict airport seen in the other team "photo"; all of these features might not only happen to have a relevant pre-Rash history but also a during-Danish-reconquest-attempts history, yadda yadda, possibly leading to a page way longer than the one on the base - where, as it turns out, we have only the here and now to report.

I might be infamous for inflating minuscule pages into PhD theses, but if nobody were to create said pages beforehand, I'ld prefer to delay such decisions until the storyline telegraphs "alright we're done with this item for the moment". ::)
It is not (confirms the relevant special page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:LonelyPages)), at least the Öresundsbro Base article links to it. (Added one from "Plot Outline", though. More links from "Table of Contents" and/or "Table of Special Pages" will likely follow.)

Given the suspenseful turn of events on p. 201 as Tuuri drives the stagecoach Cattank over the frail log road, I think the Öresundsbro Bridge definitely deserves its own page!  (Hopefully not with its own list of casualties...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 23, 2014, 12:56:33 AM
Given the suspenseful turn of events on p. 201 as Tuuri drives the stagecoach Cattank over the frail log road, I think the Öresundsbro Bridge definitely deserves its own page!  (Hopefully not with its own list of casualties...)

I created it a couple of days ago, but could never finish more than a line of introduction for technical reasons (mostly consisting in "Nimphy, give me the computer!!")
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 25, 2014, 01:06:29 AM
We seem to have a new contributor on the Wiki with, ummh ... IMHO mixed results. On one hand, I like the "Characters" template (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Characters) and the use of "location" infoboxes fine and will have a look at expanding those ideas to other categories when time permits. On the other hand, we now have a "Dalahästen giant (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Dalah%C3%A4sten_giant)" page essentially narrating the scene, with a lot of not-quite-factual detail, another page on "Scandinavia (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Scandinavia)" and how the meaning has supposedly changed post-Rash, and a bunch of added redirections to existing pages a la "Tuuri" -> "Tuuri Hotakainen" or "Troll" -> "Trolls". (Middle ground provided by adding a category "Giants" besides "Creatures" and renaming a couple pages so as to remove the leading article.)

Would someone like to play second (actually third and counting) opinion there ... ?

yeah, I noticed that too. I do like the infoboxes they're using for countries (and was, incidentally, wondering if it would be worthwhile to add pre-Rash demographics?) but there is just... way too many categories and pages now. I don't know if we need a category called "people" if we already have one called "characters" that was doing nicely. There are also pages for each nationality which contain largely the same information that is already in the "known so-and-so" under the country pages. Personally, I'd prefer to have less individual pages but with more information, so as not to create too many stub articles (as this person seems to be doing...)

Also, this page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Family_Tree) outlining the speculated (?) family tree linking the prologue characters to our heroes also was created by that same person, and while I understand that it took a lot of work, it's difficult to read and not really needed since we have the list of prologue characters who share last names and facial features with our main cast. Even then, realizing that "OH MY GOD THEY'RE RELATED" I feel like is an important part of reading the comic, and I'd rather not spoil that.

Sorry if this turned out kind of long. This person clearly wants to help and I appreciate that, they seem to know a lot about Wiki coding, but... I don't know if they're entirely clear on the direction we're taking this.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 25, 2014, 02:27:52 AM
Mixed opinions here too. They sure know their wiki coding, but giants category? We already have a monsters category. People? There's characters already! Plus, I constantly receive emails about edits, but none of them are actually adding something to the pages, and it's kind of annoying.

If everyone's okay, I'll start a little polishing by taking away the two above mentioned categories and editing some of the new pages.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 25, 2014, 02:34:14 AM
Mixed opinions here too. They sure know their wiki coding, but giants category? We already have a monsters category. People? There's characters already! Plus, I constantly receive emails about edits, but none of them are actually adding something to the pages, and it's kind of annoying.

If everyone's okay, I'll start a little polishing by taking away the two above mentioned categories and editing some of the new pages.

Sounds good to me! Also, you or I could look through the Wanted Pages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WantedPages) list and see if there are things there that maybe are already covered in other pages, so don't really need their own page - if they don't, remove the links to them from other pages.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 25, 2014, 02:55:49 AM
Hydroelectric energy? Nokia? Isafjordur? Geothermal energy? This is supposed to be a wiki for SSSS, not Wikipedia! Nearly all the pages in there are about minor cities which maybe weren't even mentioned - do we really need that much useless information in the wiki?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on October 25, 2014, 10:21:26 AM
Hydroelectric energy? Nokia? Isafjordur? Geothermal energy? This is supposed to be a wiki for SSSS, not Wikipedia! Nearly all the pages in there are about minor cities which maybe weren't even mentioned - do we really need that much useless information in the wiki?

Well, I guess we could lump them all together in a pre-rash Nordics article as a kind of introductory reader for people who have no clue about Nordic society.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 25, 2014, 06:14:10 PM
Hydroelectric energy? Nokia? Isafjordur? Geothermal energy? This is supposed to be a wiki for SSSS, not Wikipedia! Nearly all the pages in there are about minor cities which maybe weren't even mentioned - do we really need that much useless information in the wiki?
We don't, that's why a good deal of those pages are still missing in the first place.

However, that doesn't mean that having links to them (i.e., redlinks) couldn't possibly serve a purpose. The "missing pages" are sorted by number of links for a reason, and in a couple instances, I've standardized page names I've found appearing in variants in that list (before ultimately creating the page and making it that more difficult to locate and correct the links to it).

(Also see the discussion ~23-Sep in this thread.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 25, 2014, 06:22:53 PM
Different subtopic, separate post ... Nimphy, could you please elaborate on that new rule in the submission guide? What I "hear" it saying is that unless Minna herself draws (random example) a chart of which character outranks which, so that we can crop and upload it, the Wiki isn't allowed to have one, even if someone were to draw it from scratch with nothing but rectangles and lines and the characters' names typed into the boxes. Is that what you mean to say?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 26, 2014, 05:04:46 AM
Different subtopic, separate post ... Nimphy, could you please elaborate on that new rule in the submission guide? What I "hear" it saying is that unless Minna herself draws (random example) a chart of which character outranks which, so that we can crop and upload it, the Wiki isn't allowed to have one, even if someone were to draw it from scratch with nothing but rectangles and lines and the characters' names typed into the boxes. Is that what you mean to say?

Well, not... Exactly. I don't think that (random example) that great painting of Lalli by Lenny belongs in the wikia, but someone may actually decide to put it up there in his gallery. That's mostly what I meant by "only official art".

Also, wouldn't the example you listed be speculation? As long as we don't actually know which character outranks which, that would be information we invented ourselves - which kinda defeats the purpose of having a wiki for known information on the comic. While I loved the idea of a language chart (the one that illustrates which character can understand who), we don't KNOW if Braidy only speaks Icelandic, that's why I don't really like it in the wiki as the main image for that article, no less.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 26, 2014, 03:47:34 PM
While I loved the idea of a language chart (the one that illustrates which character can understand who), we don't KNOW if Braidy only speaks Icelandic, that's why I don't really like it in the wiki as the main image for that article, no less.
Well that's easy enough to fix, I've kept interim versions so as to be able to correct for additional Braidy languages after the fact, anyway. I thought that the "fanart" statement was objecting to my using snippets of Minnas artwork to symbolize characters and languages ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 26, 2014, 06:23:53 PM
I like how the Öresund Bridge article is shaping up, but it leads me to ask a question about spoilers - would the bridge breaking be considered a spoiler? How do we deal with these in the future, as the plot thickens and people might not want to know certain details if they just start reading? Should we put up spoiler warnings, or just try to stick to general information and leave the plot out of it?

EDIT: Nimphy, do you mind if I take the rules you wrote up and put them into their own page, rather than a blog post?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 26, 2014, 06:58:50 PM
Should we put up spoiler warnings, or just try to stick to general information and leave the plot out of it?
You might want to check out the "Spoiler block" and "Spoiler text" templates here (http://toarumajutsunoindex.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Spoiler_Templates) ...

EDIT: Nimphy, do you mind if I take the rules you wrote up and put them into their own page, rather than a blog post?
I added references between that blog post and the "Submission guide" page a while ago, assuming that the latter had already superseded the former ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on October 26, 2014, 07:50:06 PM
I like how the Öresund Bridge article is shaping up, but it leads me to ask a question about spoilers - would the bridge breaking be considered a spoiler? How do we deal with these in the future, as the plot thickens and people might not want to know certain details if they just start reading? Should we put up spoiler warnings, or just try to stick to general information and leave the plot out of it?

I think we are just going to have to live with the fact that the wiki is a walking spoiler. Maybe put a warning on the frontpage that you shouldn't be there if you haven't read the whole thing, because it's pretty much unavoidable.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Eich on October 26, 2014, 11:55:29 PM
I think we are just going to have to live with the fact that the wiki is a walking spoiler. Maybe put a warning on the frontpage that you shouldn't be there if you haven't read the whole thing, because it's pretty much unavoidable.
As with almost every other wiki. 
The One Piece wiki spoiled so much for me, but I just couldn't help myself.  Now I know better, of course, but still... hard times.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on October 27, 2014, 09:49:01 AM
As with almost every other wiki. 
The One Piece wiki spoiled so much for me, but I just couldn't help myself.  Now I know better, of course, but still... hard times.

That is still one of the better wikis out there, but yeah. Don't walk into the wiki of a 700 chapter story if you don't want to be spoiled.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 28, 2014, 09:00:59 AM
Uh ... what happened? I'ld swear I've seen more edits by KenoSarawa over the weekend, but right now none show up in the lists of recent changes anymore ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 28, 2014, 10:53:53 AM
Uh ... what happened? I'ld swear I've seen more edits by KenoSarawa over the weekend, but right now none show up in the lists of recent changes anymore ... ?

Looking at the profile (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/KenoSarawa), their last edit was on the 24th... I've been watching the edits all weekend as well and other than you adding Nav boxes and someone (either you or Nimphy) working on the Oresund Bridge article, we haven't had much going on.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 28, 2014, 11:17:31 AM
I've been watching the edits all weekend as well and other than you adding Nav boxes and [...] working on the Oresund Bridge article, we haven't had much going on.
Hm. Guess I should stop not using psychoactive substances, then. ???

Other topic: After seeing KenoSarawas "location" infobox, I stewed up a "person" infobox, somewhat adapted to the kind of data we typically have for SSSS characters but adaptable to cover real-world persons as well. I made some samples (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_person#Samples) and also edited it into Onnis page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Onni_Hotakainen) and my profile (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2) to show what it does. Before I carpet-bomb the character pages with it, is there something y'all'ld like added or changed?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 28, 2014, 12:14:15 PM
Hm. Guess I should stop not using psychoactive substances, then. ???

Other topic: After seeing KenoSarawas "location" infobox, I stewed up a "person" infobox, somewhat adapted to the kind of data we typically have for SSSS characters but adaptable to cover real-world persons as well. I made some samples (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_person#Samples) and also edited it into Onnis page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Onni_Hotakainen) and my profile (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2) to show what it does. Before I carpet-bomb the character pages with it, is there something y'all'ld like added or changed?

Looks great to me - could you perhaps change the abbreviations in the languages section with flags?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 28, 2014, 12:32:43 PM
I agree with Nimpy about the flags!

Also, if these go ahead, should we take out the information in the body of the text that's already covered in the info box?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 28, 2014, 01:17:49 PM
could you perhaps change the abbreviations in the languages section with flags?
The respective input field of the template accepts Wikitext, so if you type in the corresponding code, you can have images appear as well. For example, I just changed the languages field's setting on my profile (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2) to
Code: [Select]
| languages     = DE, EN, FR, [[File:Example.jpg|30px|link=File:Example.jpg|alt=gibberish]](... aaaand the "alt=" part plain doesn't work. :( )

Providing a means to not force people to type all that stuff is even more complicated, for a host of reasons:
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 28, 2014, 05:04:21 PM
  • First and foremost, that requires an exhaustive collection of flag images to be retrieved and uploaded to the wiki --> copyright issues. (Not to mention eternal whining if a language is spoken in several nations and each wants to see its own flag shown.)
OK, seems that Wiki[pm]edia usually have countries' flags put under permissive licenses (often in the Public Domain) and offer 200px PNG versions (that we would have to shrink further, like, to 20x15 or 30x22). All "flat" and rectangular, of course.

Then there's commercially available sets with embellished design (http://www.icons-land.com/vista-flags-icons.php), but I guess we would still have to upload them to Wikia manually one by one ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 29, 2014, 07:51:39 PM
I agree with Nimpy about the flags!
Bomb run done, with flags, and also with making some of the in-table captions into links to appropriate wiki pages.

Turns out that I can shoehorn "|" into template code using the "!" template, but not the ":" I'ld need to make the captions into direct links to category listings. I tried and made a "!!!" template (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:!!!), but it doesn't work; someone with admin powers please delete it. I worked around the problem by creating redirects to the three respective categories, and pointing the links to those.

Also, if these go ahead, should we take out the information in the body of the text that's already covered in the info box?
My .02: Doing so is likely to punch holes into the flow of the pre-existing text, so if and when it is done, a proper rewording is likely necessary; hence, I left the text unchanged while just dropping the infoboxes in every which direction. I don't think it's absolutely necessary to deduplicate, though. "Quick look at infobox for raw standard type of information" and "read through the entire text (but probably ignoring the delimited infobox)" are use modes different enough that one's content is unlikely to hamper the other.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 29, 2014, 08:42:23 PM
Haylo, as you can see, I have a measly one box under my name. Pray tell, how could I go about acquiring more?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 29, 2014, 10:56:34 PM
Haylo, as you can see, I have a measly one box under my name. Pray tell, how could I go about acquiring more?
Not with the wiki (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Stand_Still,_Stay_Silent_Wiki)
It's a forum only thing (http://ssssforum.pcriot.com/index.php?topic=16.msg98#msg98)
Keep posting haikus ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 12:44:52 AM
Not with the wiki (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Stand_Still,_Stay_Silent_Wiki)
It's a forum only thing (http://ssssforum.pcriot.com/index.php?topic=16.msg98#msg98)
Keep posting haikus ...
Well played sir, well played
I shall attempt to do so
Haikus are awesome
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 30, 2014, 01:35:29 PM
Quick question while the Minna Sundberg page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Minna_Sundberg) is still an orphan (not liked from anyplace else, short of the list of all pages): I uploaded a scan of the drawing Minna did of herself for the aRTD book, but I'm still hesitating. She seems to be going out of her way to not put even that much onto her own comic websites. D'y'all think we should better have that image removed again?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 30, 2014, 02:07:14 PM
Quick question while the Minna Sundberg page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Minna_Sundberg) is still an orphan (not liked from anyplace else, short of the list of all pages): I uploaded a scan of the drawing Minna did of herself for the aRTD book, but I'm still hesitating. She seems to be going out of her way to not put even that much onto her own comic websites. D'y'all think we should better have that image removed again?

Despite how happy I am to have finally found a portrait of Minna, I think you should ask her first. By email, maybe, or by any means you want...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on October 30, 2014, 02:43:25 PM
Quick question while the Minna Sundberg page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Minna_Sundberg) is still an orphan (not liked from anyplace else, short of the list of all pages): I uploaded a scan of the drawing Minna did of herself for the aRTD book, but I'm still hesitating. She seems to be going out of her way to not put even that much onto her own comic websites. D'y'all think we should better have that image removed again?

She did put an actual picture of herself on her own web page. I linked to that in an other thread but decided to delete it since, well, she seems to be reserved about these things so it's better to be safe than sorry.

A drawn portrait seems somewhat less touchy though.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 30, 2014, 03:12:11 PM
Despite how happy I am to have finally found a portrait of Minna, I think you should ask her first. By email, maybe, or by any means you want...
I'll try by e-mail. Removed the image from the page, but I'm afraid it takes an admin to actually delete it from the wiki ...

(... same for the "!!!" template, which I created but couldn't get to function as intended ...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 30, 2014, 04:36:28 PM
I'll try by e-mail. Removed the image from the page, but I'm afraid it takes an admin to actually delete it from the wiki ...

(... same for the "!!!" template, which I created but couldn't get to function as intended ...)

I can delete the !!! template - let me know about the drawing, and I can use my admin magic to banish it into the ether forever.

I do wonder though, where most of the info on that page came from? Minna seems to be rather reluctant to share personal details...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 30, 2014, 04:50:44 PM
I can delete the !!! template - let me know about the drawing, and I can use my admin magic to banish it into the ether forever.

I do wonder though, where most of the info on that page came from? Minna seems to be rather reluctant to share personal details...

She does let us in on bits of her personal life every now and then on the author's blog (see the recent stuff about banks, or her grandma's unfortunate death earlier on). Either of us can delete the drawing, but let's wait until Minna gives consensus/thinks the wiki was a horrible idea.

Also, some quick things:
- (Pssst, JoB, one of the English flags you uploaded is the United Kingdom's, not Great Britain's!) I'll change the description later - as far as I know GB doesn't even have a flag.
- Do we need an aRTD wikia, too? Because I don't see how aRTD could fit in the SSSS wikia, and there are a few references to it and even a page on the subject. Maybe later (and I'll probably leave the task of creating it to someone else), hmm?
- Is it just me, or did KenoSarawa stop editing the wikia?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 30, 2014, 04:58:18 PM
She does let us in on bits of her personal life every now and then on the author's blog (see the recent stuff about banks, or her grandma's unfortunate death earlier on). Either of us can delete the drawing, but let's wait until Minna gives consensus/thinks the wiki was a horrible idea.

Also, some quick things:
- (Pssst, JoB, one of the English flags you uploaded is the United Kingdom's, not Great Britain's!) I'll change the description later - as far as I know GB doesn't even have a flag.
- Do we need an aRTD wikia, too? Because I don't see how aRTD could fit in the SSSS wikia, and there are a few references to it and even a page on the subject. Maybe later (and I'll probably leave the task of creating it to someone else), hmm?
- Is it just me, or did KenoSarawa stop editing the wikia?

I didn't see any edits from them since that comment you left, Nimphy. I hope we didn't scare them off!  :-[

Also, I wonder if things such as Minna's page, and aRTD, and other "real-life" things might better belong in their own category, since they're kind of... outside of the fictional world of SSSS? We could call it "meta" or something...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 30, 2014, 05:19:10 PM
I didn't see any edits from them since that comment you left, Nimphy. I hope we didn't scare them off!  :-[

Also, I wonder if things such as Minna's page, and aRTD, and other "real-life" things might better belong in their own category, since they're kind of... outside of the fictional world of SSSS? We could call it "meta" or something...

N-nuuu, I didn't want to scare them off! Why can't I be nicer to people  :-[  :'(

Yes, and maybe put a warning on top of the page saying that it's not part of the SSSS universe?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 30, 2014, 05:21:15 PM
N-nuuu, I didn't want to scare them off! Why can't I be nicer to people  :-[  :'(

Yes, and maybe put a warning on top of the page saying that it's not part of the SSSS universe?

I'm sure it's not your fault, Nimphy! D: Sorry if it came off that way!

I'll get right onto those articles though, since I'm somehow not getting any actual work done today anyway.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 05:37:09 PM
I'm sure it's not your fault, Nimphy! D: Sorry if it came off that way!

I'll get right onto those articles though, since I'm somehow not getting any actual work done today anyway.
Guys, what's going on? Sorry if I'm a bit late to the party.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 30, 2014, 05:48:46 PM
Guys, what's going on? Sorry if I'm a bit late to the party.

Nothing important, just a new user was making a lot of edits, some of them quite useless, and I apparently scared him away. Any tips to share about the wiki, or maybe some article you'd like to work on?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 06:01:12 PM
Nothing important, just a new user was making a lot of edits, some of them quite useless, and I apparently scared him away. Any tips to share about the wiki, or maybe some article you'd like to work on?
On the wiki...I didn't even know we had a wiki! Oh. Whelp, time to go check that out!\
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 30, 2014, 06:07:04 PM
On the wiki...I didn't even know we had a wiki! Oh. Whelp, time to go check that out!\

This thread is called Wiki Discussion and is pinned on top of the board! How could anyone NOT know we have a wiki?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 06:10:52 PM
This thread is called Wiki Discussion and is pinned on top of the board! How could anyone NOT know we have a wiki?
heh, heh...I'm rather slow on the uptake...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 06:11:41 PM
Regardless, I'm not sure that I can contribute much info, so I think I'll just trawl through it to make it better in terms of clarity and readability
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 06:49:19 PM
Ay, I've been trying to sign up on the wiki but it ain't sending me the confirmation mail. Suggestions?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 30, 2014, 07:36:07 PM
Nothing important, just a new user was making a lot of edits, some of them quite useless, and I apparently scared him away.

I looked at the list of users and KenoSarawa last logged in on the 29th, so they still be around... somewhere. For some reason it doesn't show the date/time of their last edit, which is very strange...

Ay, I've been trying to sign up on the wiki but it ain't sending me the confirmation mail. Suggestions?

Wikia (the site that hosts it) seems to be rather picky with these things; did you check your spam folder? I had a terrible time getting signed up, eventually I had to authenticate with Facebook.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 30, 2014, 08:10:41 PM
Ay, I've been trying to sign up on the wiki but it ain't sending me the confirmation mail. Suggestions?
The wiki's running on Wikias servers, I don't consider it likely that they have a long-lasting problem to send out e-mails. Please check your spam folder ... (And it that doesn't turn up anything, we do have both admins reading this thread. ;) )

I can delete the !!! template - let me know about the drawing, and I can use my admin magic to banish it into the ether forever.
I'ld say that deleting it now (and reuploading it later, if Minna agrees) might be the better solution - short of that, it might be hard, but not impossible to find on the wiki. Sorry for the hassle.

I do wonder though, where most of the info on that page came from? Minna seems to be rather reluctant to share personal details...
As Nimphy said, it's basically me remembering stuff Minna herself told us in the comments (both Disqus/ID and the "author's comment"), the blog, etc.. (And I'm not even reading her on Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, or DeviantArt.) Which means that that info will remain available to everyone who takes the time to read through those, whether we summarize part of it in the wiki or not ...

Also, some quick things:
- (Pssst, JoB, one of the English flags you uploaded is the United Kingdom's, not Great Britain's!) I'll change the description later - as far as I know GB doesn't even have a flag.
Oh, bugger. >:( In my defense, the ISO 3166 two-letter code for the nation is "GB" (while the Internet ccTLD is .uk) and Wikipedia does have a page "Flag of Great Britain (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Great_Britain)" showing what I admittedly took for the Union Jack (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom) (but it's actually missing the St. Patrick's Cross part (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Union_Jack_evolution)) ...

- Do we need an aRTD wikia, too? Because I don't see how aRTD could fit in the SSSS wikia
Heh, coincidence. I created an aRTD page in the SSSS wiki (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/A_Redtail%27s_Dream) today to satisfy the cross-referencing need. 8)

I don't think that an entire wiki would make sense, though. aRTD is completed, can be read online within a couple hours, as several newcomers confirmed in the SSSS comments, and with almost the entire story taking place in a world of magiiiiiic, creating a wiki to collect hard facts sounds a bit futile ... ;D

- Is it just me, or did KenoSarawa stop editing the wikia?
Looks like it. I had a look at his user pages in the Wikias listed as his "favorite" ones (a list that, as far as I can tell, isn't based on the user in question stating his actual preferences but autogenerated from whatever metrics Wikia collects on someone's activities), he seems to be one for bulk makeovers ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Noah O. on October 30, 2014, 08:28:08 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, guys.
It was in my "Social" Folder, which is rather weird.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 31, 2014, 01:13:41 PM
I need to get your opinions on something, fellow wiki editors!

KenoSarawa made nationality-specific categories for Characters like "Dane" and "Icelander" etc... I personally don't see the reason to further subdivide the pages this way, but I wanted to ask what everyone else thinks before I get rid of those categories.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on October 31, 2014, 01:18:43 PM
I need to get your opinions on something, fellow wiki editors!

KenoSarawa made nationality-specific categories for Characters like "Dane" and "Icelander" etc... I personally don't see the reason to further subdivide the pages this way, but I wanted to ask what everyone else thinks before I get rid of those categories.

They would fit way petter as part of the country-specific pages.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 31, 2014, 01:33:40 PM
I need to get your opinions on something, fellow wiki editors!

KenoSarawa made nationality-specific categories for Characters like "Dane" and "Icelander" etc... I personally don't see the reason to further subdivide the pages this way, but I wanted to ask what everyone else thinks before I get rid of those categories.

Heh, you beat me to it, dang it! So what do you think, Solovei? I have mixed opinions on the subject, personally, and as we live in democracies (except for Norwegians, but who cares, their opinion will simply not be asked ;P), let the people vote!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on October 31, 2014, 01:49:27 PM
Heh, you beat me to it, dang it! So what do you think, Solovei? I have mixed opinions on the subject, personally, and as we live in democracies (except for Norwegians, but who cares, their opinion will simply not be asked ;P), let the people vote!

Hey!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on October 31, 2014, 01:55:14 PM
Heh, you beat me to it, dang it! So what do you think, Solovei? I have mixed opinions on the subject, personally, and as we live in democracies (except for Norwegians, but who cares, their opinion will simply not be asked ;P), let the people vote!

To me, if there's only one page in a given category, then we do not need that category. I understand if we had a main cast of 40+ characters and they each needed their own page, but as it is, only the main characters get individual pages so subdividing them further makes no sense.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 31, 2014, 02:02:19 PM
Hey!

If you're not alright with that, 2014 needs another referendum. Let 1946 happen for Norway, too.

Hehehe, just kidding, I hope I didn't offend you or anything. Of course we'd love to hear your opinion!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on October 31, 2014, 02:25:49 PM
If you're not alright with that, 2014 needs another referendum. Let 1946 happen for Norway, too.

Hehehe, just kidding, I hope I didn't offend you or anything. Of course we'd love to hear your opinion!

Not offended, just being playful. :) I'm sure you can figure things out fine.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on October 31, 2014, 04:28:00 PM
To me, if there's only one page in a given category, then we do not need that category.
Actually there are more pages in those categories (I just grabbed Norway for an example, it contains three) and I still think it's more of a burden to lug those dependencies around whenever you edit pages than it'll be worth anytime soon.

However, let me add some more detail: Before, we had two pages on individual Norwegians (Sigrun and Trond), categorized as "characters" (and maybe "people", I don't quite remember when that got introduced), a page on Norway (categorized as "countries" and "locations") linking to those two Norwegians, and links to the Norway page for all purposes of nation, populace, or language.

Now there's a category "Norwegian", a page "Norwegian (people)" (marked as a stub) in that category, in addition to Sigruns and Tronds pages, and redlinks (e.g., in the infobox of the "Norway" page) to a "Norwegian (language)" page that hasn't been created yet. While all the information about Norway as a whole, including a list of known Norwegians, is still snugly sitting in the rather short "Norway" page. (And chances of the comic providing more information about SSSS Norway anytime soon are rather slim, as the expedition's currently heading out into the Silent World.)

While I'm rambling: I think we have two options here, either we keep the categories trimmed down to what we can memorize and handle manually when we edit and categorize pages, or we lay down a systematic array of categories once and for all the foreseeable future and have pages auto-assigned to them by way of sophisticated templates (you tell the template "it's a character, he's male and a Norwegian, ..." and the page pops up in categories ranging from "characters" and "SSSS storyverse" to "male Norwegian characters that Minna hasn't gotten killed yet").
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on October 31, 2014, 04:38:37 PM
Actually there are more pages in those categories (I just grabbed Norway for an example, it contains three) and I still think it's more of a burden to lug those dependencies around whenever you edit pages than it'll be worth anytime soon.

However, let me add some more detail: Before, we had two pages on individual Norwegians (Sigrun and Trond), categorized as "characters" (and maybe "people", I don't quite remember when that got introduced), a page on Norway (categorized as "countries" and "locations") linking to those two Norwegians, and links to the Norway page for all purposes of nation, populace, or language.

Now there's a category "Norwegian", a page "Norwegian (people)" (marked as a stub) in that category, in addition to Sigruns and Tronds pages, and redlinks (e.g., in the infobox of the "Norway" page) to a "Norwegian (language)" page that hasn't been created yet. While all the information about Norway as a whole, including a list of known Norwegians, is still snugly sitting in the rather short "Norway" page. (And chances of the comic providing more information about SSSS Norway anytime soon are rather slim, as the expedition's currently heading out into the Silent World.)

While I'm rambling: I think we have two options here, either we keep the categories trimmed down to what we can memorize and handle manually when we edit and categorize pages, or we lay down a systematic array of categories once and for all the foreseeable future and have pages auto-assigned to them by way of sophisticated templates (you tell the template "it's a character, he's male and a Norwegian, ..." and the page pops up in categories ranging from "characters" and "SSSS storyverse" to "male Norwegian characters that Minna hasn't gotten killed yet").

...

"Delete categories" it is.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 01, 2014, 01:50:58 PM
(... I probably should've mentioned that the {{Characters}} template KenoSarawa created already includes the [[Category:Characters]] categorization label, so if the template's being used on a page, it doesn't need to be explicitly put into the category anymore.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 01, 2014, 01:58:31 PM
(... I probably should've mentioned that the {{Characters}} template KenoSarawa created already includes the [[Category:Characters]] categorization label, so if the template's being used on a page, it doesn't need to be explicitly put into the category anymore.)

I'm kind of confused about how templates work... do they designate a given page as, like a character page as opposed to any other kind (e.g. a location page), or does it just pre-load certain sections like an infobox?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 01, 2014, 02:11:37 PM
"Delete categories" it is.
The single-populace-related stub pages ("Dane", "Icelander", "Swede"), too?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 01, 2014, 02:25:43 PM
The single-populace-related stub pages ("Dane", "Icelander", "Swede"), too?

I think I got rid of most of those already. Didn't seem any point in keeping them since we already have "Known Danes/Icelanders/Swedes" on each country's page.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 02, 2014, 04:01:17 PM
I'm kind of confused about how templates work... do they designate a given page as, like a character page as opposed to any other kind (e.g. a location page), or does it just pre-load certain sections like an infobox?
(How did I miss answering this one so far ... ?)

Templates are, well, templates that you can include into a page. By and large, the page will then be rendered as if the content of the template had been inserted into the page in the place of the "call" to the template.

Note that I said "content", not "text". With some limitations, template can contain code (Wikitext), and the "Characters" template contains the Wikicode to mark whatever-it-winds-up-in as a member of the "Characters" category. (Wikia insists on having you edit templates in the code editor because the visual editors trying to interpret the partial Wikicode in some templates would result in utter gibberish.)

Now for the fine print, a.k.a. exceptions:
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 02, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
On a different note: I think I'm finally getting somewhere with hidden content, but in order to work for all readers, an admin needs to insert a bit of JavaScript code into places a mere mortal like me cannot touch.

If you want to have a look at what I'm doing, please proceed as follows:

The JavaScript:
Code: [Select]
importArticles({
     type: "script", article: "external:dev:MediaWiki:ShowHide/code.js"
 });

P.S.: Actual templates and pointers to ShowHide shamelessly stolen from the Sryth Wikia (http://sryth.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Spoiler_templates), which was referenced from a Wikia support discussion on the topic of "spoiler templates", if you're interested. Use of importArticles and the specific JS pages mentioned above are adaptations to newer developments on Wikia, especially the Wikia style supplanting Monobook after all those discussions took place. Oh, and note to self: Will need to provide documentation for the templates I added, too. (Doc is still part of the template itself in Monobook-based Sryth Wikia, while SSSS supports separate doc pages for templates ... :o
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 02, 2014, 06:13:56 PM
That wiki you linked to, I like that thing it has on the front page that says how many pages there are and when it was started... can we have something like that?

I don't know, there's just... so many cool wiki's out there and I want ours to be one of them :P Then again, there's only so much we can put in. Like, we're kind of at Minna's mercy here.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 03, 2014, 07:03:24 AM
That wiki you linked to, I like that thing it has on the front page that says how many pages there are and when it was started... can we have something like that?
The start date will need to be typed in manually (once) IIUC, but the counts are available as "magic codes". Lookie here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2#Technical_Information) and here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Magic_words). ;)

I don't know, there's just... so many cool wiki's out there and I want ours to be one of them :P Then again, there's only so much we can put in. Like, we're kind of at Minna's mercy here.
That's the aspect of content, and then there's the same thing with technology. Some of the Wikias have nifty spoiler templates with icon images that scroll open and close and whatnot, but I don't think we have enough JavaScript etc. etc. knowledge assembled on the SSSS wiki (yet?) to be able to maintain such beasts ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 03, 2014, 02:34:01 PM
On a different note: I think I'm finally getting somewhere with hidden content, but in order to work for all readers, an admin needs to insert a bit of JavaScript code into places a mere mortal like me cannot touch.
... uuuhhhhh ... hold that thought, please. I just removed said code from my personal common.js and the spoiler stuff still works. Maybe the wiki already automatically includes ShowHide and the test spoilers didn't work because I still had some bug in them (or needed to reload thrice or somesuch) ...

Could someone who has not yet touched any JavaScript setups of his own please confirm that the examples linked in items 4. and 5. above do the Expand/Collapse thing properly?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 03, 2014, 05:21:14 PM
I used a different browser (without ad blocker) to check the above question ... are the ads always placed that poorly? :(

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 05, 2014, 05:11:59 PM
Heh, coincidence. I created an aRTD page in the SSSS wiki (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/A_Redtail%27s_Dream) today to satisfy the cross-referencing need. 8)
Speaking of which: I have IMHO completed the actual book info today, the last placeholder section title left to fill is "Related Finnish Mythology". I'm having two thoughts on that:
... whaddya think?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 05, 2014, 09:55:01 PM
Speaking of which: I have IMHO completed the actual book info today, the last placeholder section title left to fill is "Related Finnish Mythology". I'm having two thoughts on that:
  • Since traditional Finnish mythology might well get referenced from SSSS (Finnish mages!) as well, it might be worthwhile to make that topic a page of its own.
  • I know pretty much nothing about that topic beyond what Minna herself (and a handful comments on the comic) taught me, and would likely end up plagiarizing most of it from the book's pertinent section. Maybe it'ld be better if someone with actual knowledge of the topic were to write it ...
... whaddya think?

First off, I have to apologize for my absense! Been busy with other work~

Second of all, wow you put a lot of work into that aRTD page! For the spoiler info though, I like that you can show/hide it but having a big box like that kind of breaks up the flow of the text and it can be a bit confusing to read...

As for your question regarding mythology... I think we should definitely contribute wiki space to mythological references as they come up - we have one regarding the Old Gods already to expanding that for other creatures would probably not be too much work. That said, I don't know if we want to devote too much time to aRTD since, as I believe Nimphy has said earlier, it's not really a wiki about aRTD, it's a wiki about SSSS. Maybe it would be better to make a general page with relevant mythology info and then mention that, like "such and such thing also appears in aRTD"
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 06, 2014, 07:41:24 AM
For the spoiler info though, I like that you can show/hide it but having a big box like that kind of breaks up the flow of the text and it can be a bit confusing to read...
Right now, all the variants of spoiler-hiding we have include a paragraph break (either through a <DIV> or by inserting a wikitable). I'm not sure that it's possible to attach the collapsing feature to anything with a lower profile than that. Will keep looking around and experimenting, though.
Maybe it would be better to make a general page with relevant mythology info and then mention that, like "such and such thing also appears in aRTD"
That's what I meant about making it a separate page (on Finnish(?) mythology, not aRTD) ... unless you mean to make several such pages?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 06, 2014, 12:55:22 PM
Right now, all the variants of spoiler-hiding we have include a paragraph break (either through a <DIV> or by inserting a wikitable). I'm not sure that it's possible to attach the collapsing feature to anything with a lower profile than that. Will keep looking around and experimenting, though.That's what I meant about making it a separate page (on Finnish(?) mythology, not aRTD) ... unless you mean to make several such pages?

I know TV Tropes has it so that the spoiler text is covered in white and you have to mouse-over to see it. However, I wonder if we even NEED to implement spoiler text? A couple pages back there was some discussion about it and it seemed to come to the idea that having a spoiler warning on the main page (and maybe a couple of other relevant pages, i.e. character/story pages) would be enough, and if people wanted to go ahead and spoil things for themselves, that was their choice.

Also, I think having hidden spoiler text would lead to a lot of debate about what is considered a spoiler and what isn't.

Sorry, I think I misunderstood about the mythology page! Just one should be okay :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 06, 2014, 01:11:18 PM
I know TV Tropes has it so that the spoiler text is covered in white and you have to mouse-over to see it.
Yeah, that requires that you somehow attach your own code to the JS onMouseOver() hook, which might be already in use by Wikias own embellishments - I'm not proficient enough to even check that, I'm afraid. There are other Wikias where spoilers appear as tooltips on mouseover, but that potentially obscures the text (sentence) a within-the-line-of-text spoiler is supposed to appear in.

I think I mostly cracked it (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:HiddenWords) with just the mwcollapsible mechanism, though.

However, I wonder if we even NEED to implement spoiler text?
Maybe not, but note that the templates I didn't flat out copy from elsewhere aren't even called foobar-spoiler-whatever in the first place. ;) On the aRTD page, most of the uses of HiddenText are more about keeping the page to a manageable size until the reader wants to dive into the details of a subsection ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 07, 2014, 07:13:21 AM
However, I wonder if we even NEED to implement spoiler text?
To address your actual point as well: If the new readers popping up in the comments are any indication, then we can expect the (most novel) readers of the wiki to have binge-read the actual SSSS comic, and likely the (non-Disqus/-IntenseDebate) author's comment below it, but not the DQ/ID comments (how many of those are there? 200 pages x 200 comments = 40,000-ish?) or aRTD. I'ld hence consider wiki information based on only the latter sources as being potentially quite spoiler-ish (and, by extension, an SSSS-wiki page about aRTD as being a good candidate for the most spoilerfest-y ever ;) ).
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 12, 2014, 02:15:33 PM
JoB, I LOVE those little comic page links you made! Do you think you could put your awesome graphics skills to use and make us a custom logo for the Wikia, too?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 12, 2014, 03:18:10 PM
JoB, I LOVE those little comic page links you made! Do you think you could put your awesome graphics skills to use and make us a custom logo for the Wikia, too?

As far as I know, only I can upload a wordmark for the wiki. I did make one at a point, but the site didn't accept the format of the image.

Then again, maybe JoB could use his awesome graphic skillz to make it, then PM the image to me.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 12, 2014, 03:46:50 PM
JoB, I LOVE those little comic page links you made!
Dang, and here I came to actually say write "I made a template 'ComicPage' so as to put an abstraction layer between SSSS page numbers and the actual URLs, in case Minna ever reorganizes her site. As a proof of concept, I shoehorned different font color and 'external link'-icon into it. Now how would y'all like the towards-SSSS links to look for realz?" ???

Do you think you could put your awesome graphics skills to use and make us a custom logo for the Wikia, too?
That arrow is just a shape-changed scaled-down version of the original SSSS logo (more precisely, this cropping (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SelburoseSymbol.jpg) thereof). The arrow is actually too small to recognize the selburose design at all, but I wonder how well using it in a recognizable size agrees with our "not officially endorsed by Minna" stance ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 12, 2014, 03:50:01 PM
As far as I know, only I can upload a wordmark for the wiki. I did make one at a point, but the site didn't accept the format of the image.

Then again, maybe JoB could use his awesome graphic skillz to make it, then PM the image to me.
That's what I was thinking too! I did play around with some possible designs a while ago but never really ended up with anything that I liked, so...

If JoB (or anyone else I guess) wants to give it a shot, it has to be a .png file that is at most 250px long and 65px wide.

The arrow is actually too small to recognize the selburose design at all, but I wonder how well using it in a recognizable size agrees with our "not officially endorsed by Minna" stance ... ?

It shows up pretty well for me, but I'm on a laptop with relatively good graphics... I suppose it could be a bit hard to see since red and purple are pretty similar colors.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 12, 2014, 04:12:16 PM
If JoB (or anyone else I guess) wants to give it a shot, it has to be a .png file that is at most 250px long and 65px wide.
Wait, what? Height about four times the width? Not the other way 'round? :o

If so, that'ld pretty much sink the design idea I just had (attached). [Ow, the pain from those copypasta artifacts. Not sure I can do noticeably better, though ...]

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 12, 2014, 04:41:33 PM
Wait, what? Height about four times the width? Not the other way 'round? :o

If so, that'ld pretty much sink the design idea I just had (attached). [Ow, the pain from those copypasta artifacts. Not sure I can do noticeably better, though ...]

... I am a giant idiot.
I get that mixed up ALL THE TIME I AM SO SORRY.
Yes, you were right. 65 high and 250 long.

*crawls under a rock*
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 12, 2014, 05:49:20 PM
Yes, you were right. 65 high and 250 long.
How about this one, then, always assuming that Minna doesn't get the impression we're stepping on her toes with that ... ?

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ThisCat on November 12, 2014, 07:21:11 PM
How about this one, then, always assuming that Minna doesn't get the impression we're stepping on her toes with that ... ?

That looks good to me.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 12, 2014, 07:45:57 PM
How about this one, then, always assuming that Minna doesn't get the impression we're stepping on her toes with that ... ?

Oooh, I like it! :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 12, 2014, 09:07:08 PM
Oooh, I like it! :)
I have a hunch that you'll like it a lot less as soon as you try to drop that largely purple, heavily white-noise-modulated image into a light orange part of the strictly-paletted wiki ... :-X
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 12, 2014, 09:20:39 PM
I have a hunch that you'll like it a lot less as soon as you try to drop that largely purple, heavily white-noise-modulated image into a light orange part of the strictly-paletted wiki ... :-X

I did have an idea but I'm not sure how it will go over with the rest of the wiki project folks/Minna herself... Someone made a link to this (http://www.minnasundberg.fi/comic/page158.php)page from ARtD where Minna made a lovely banner announcing the name for SSSS... I wonder if we could use it somehow? Maybe not as the wordmark as it's far too large but surely somewhere on the front page?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 12, 2014, 10:25:43 PM
I wonder if we could use it somehow? Maybe not as the wordmark as it's far too large but surely somewhere on the front page?
Scale it to 1/3 and it's 224x44 ... then threaten copyright holder to refer to the comic as "LPLHRTTG" if she doesn't play along ... :P
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 13, 2014, 10:36:10 AM
Well, that's promising ... not. :-\

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 13, 2014, 04:16:26 PM
So I noticed that we still have a page specifically describing the Dalahasten giant (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Dalah%C3%A4sten_giant) and pretty much narrating the fight against it in the comic. Do we want to keep this? Most of the info is duplicated on the Giants (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Giant) page
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 13, 2014, 04:58:01 PM
So I noticed that we still have a page specifically describing the Dalahasten giant (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Dalah%C3%A4sten_giant) and pretty much narrating the fight against it in the comic. Do we want to keep this?
Not to mention giving some rather dubitable information (the train cats hissing? And Agneta not smelling the coffee before they do?).

I'd be in favor of removing the page, together with its "Giants" category. (And while you're swinging the admin hammer, could you please annihilate the redirections "Template:ARTDPage (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:ARTDPage?redirect=no)" and "Template:ARTDPage/doc (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:ARTDPage/doc?redirect=no)"? I realized too late that a template to link to aRTD comic pages alone wouldn't see enough use to be worth it.)

We might want to clean up a bit among the high-level categories, too. The hierarchy looks a bit counterintuitive (see attachment) ...

(P.S.: Ix-nay on the chment-attay. SMF says "The upload folder is full. Please try a smaller file and/or contact an administrator." ... ?)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 13, 2014, 05:04:11 PM
(And while you're swinging the admin hammer, could you please annihilate the redirections "Template:ARTDPage (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:ARTDPage?redirect=no)" and "Template:ARTDPage/doc (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:ARTDPage/doc?redirect=no)"? I realized too late that a template to link to aRTD comic pages alone wouldn't see enough use to be worth it.)

We might want to clean up a bit among the high-level categories, too. The hierarchy looks a bit counterintuitive (see attachment) ...

(P.S.: Ix-nay on the chment-attay. SMF says "The upload folder is full. Please try a smaller file and/or contact an administrator." ... ?)

Deleted the two template redirects! Also deleting the "Giants" category but I'll hold off on removing the page for now, in case Nimphy wants to keep it.

You could always upload the attachments on something like imgur or tinypic? But yeah, maybe contact Eich and see what the problem is.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 13, 2014, 08:29:17 PM
We might want to clean up a bit among the high-level categories, too. The hierarchy looks a bit counterintuitive (see attachment) ...
Since we're required to detach ourselves from attachments ...

Go here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:CategoryTree), enter "Content", click all
Code: [Select]
[+] you can find. Why both "Comic" and "World" ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 14, 2014, 07:06:46 AM
So, may I upload that wordmark? Is it fine for everyone?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 14, 2014, 08:23:43 AM
So, may I upload that wordmark? Is it fine for everyone?
I tried again, but I really don't have (or know) the proper tools to tweak the image to the current colors of the wiki style (which, BTW, are #f14800 for the deep orange and #6f017b for the sidebar purple) ... :-[
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 14, 2014, 08:35:56 AM
I tried again, but I really don't have (or know) the proper tools to tweak the image to the current colors of the wiki style (which, BTW, are #f14800 for the deep orange and #6f017b for the sidebar purple) ... :-[

You kow, I could just change the wiki's style to match the wordmark... How do you think I should make it?

PS: I'd be in favour of keeping the Dalahasten giant, but maybe as a mention in the Giants page, instead of having its own, hmm?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 14, 2014, 10:17:09 AM
You kow, I could just change the wiki's style to match the wordmark... How do you think I should make it?
If you mean "where are the levers", I'm afraid that I have no idea.

In order to make the wiki match that image, you'ld have to adapt not only the colors, but also make "the backgrounds" (to be defined) as grainy as that image's background is. Which would then clash with the monochromatic background of the text areas and the gradients in the top and bottom bar ...

... and if I were to trace the font and the diamonds and put everything back together, the resulting image would be any color we want, but not have that "old and worn" look anymore ...

PS: I'd be in favour of keeping the Dalahasten giant, but maybe as a mention in the Giants page, instead of having its own, hmm?
The "Giants" page does have a mention of the Dalahästen incident - three lines vs. three screenfuls of text. But we do want to avoid straight renarrations of the comic, right ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 14, 2014, 11:22:37 AM
Go here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:CategoryTree), enter "Content", click all
Code: [Select]
[+] you can find. Why both "Comic" and "World" ... ?

Oh my gosh, THAT'S how you use that? I've always wondered! I'll try to clean those up today... In my view, I assumed "Comic" was sort of like our "meta" category, it's thing about the webcomic SSSS as it exists on the internet; The "World" category is a little strange, because, like - how I had originally envisioned it, it would be something to describe things that aren't characters or locations or any other category. Mostly terminology-related things like The Rash and Skalds and Cleansers. I'm not entire sure how it became the top-level category though.

But we do want to avoid straight renarrations of the comic, right ... ?

If possible, yes.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 14, 2014, 01:25:16 PM
Oh my gosh, THAT'S how you use that? I've always wondered!
Can't say for sure. This tool insinuates that categories should have a hierarchical order, as it tries to display them in a tree. On the other hand, that would imply that there's always at least one category listed as being an uncategorized category (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:UncategorizedCategories). (That likely was the case with our "Browse" category, until KenoSarawa made it a subcategory of itself (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Browse?action=history).)

When you look at the list of categories (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Categories), you'll note that there's a bunch of them that came pre-installed by Wikia when our wiki was set up. I'ld suggest to be very careful with major changes to those, as they might play an important role in meta-administration that we just have not yet heard of ...

I'll try to clean those up today... In my view, I assumed "Comic" was sort of like our "meta" category, it's thing about the webcomic SSSS as it exists on the internet; The "World" category is a little strange, because, like - how I had originally envisioned it, it would be something to describe things that aren't characters or locations or any other category. Mostly terminology-related things like The Rash and Skalds and Cleansers. I'm not entire sure how it became the top-level category though.
Eeeeehh ... I guess I'll better triage the existing categories per their origin right now ...

... uuuugghhhh, it seems that not all categories implied by Wikias defaults have an actual description provided as well, so that the first user to later add that gets listed as "creating" the category. >:( I'll have to grab some random other recent Wikias and compare the categories to nail that ...

-------

Apparent Wikia-default categories:
Blog posts (*), Browse (*)(**), Forums (*), General wiki templates, Help (*), Help desk (*), Template documentation (*), Templates (*), Watercooler (*).
(*) confirmed by version history; (**) edited
Note: All these categories except "General wiki templates" and the self-inclusion of "Browse" are organized in a hierarchy with "Browse" being the top.

The categories "Article management templates" and "Article stubs" are implied by KenoSarawas "Stub" template, which is used in the "Old Gods" (by KenoSarawa) and "Rønne" (by me) pages.

Categories apparently outright created by KenoSarawa:
Comic, Content.

Genuine categories to classify topics are:
Characters, Countries, Creatures, Locations, Professions, Technology.

The rest:
Meta (Solovei), Navigation templates (implied by KenoSarawa, edited+expanded by me), Spoiler templates (me), "Story, Plot Points, Artwork" (me).

-------

Alright, proposal:
(***) I don't care much whether that's one global "Content" or a triptych of "Comic content"/"Comic meta"/"Real world and fandom", as long as it's clear which one to put a page/topic into.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 14, 2014, 06:30:22 PM
... and if I were to trace the font and the diamonds and put everything back together, the resulting image would be any color we want, but not have that "old and worn" look anymore ...
... as in here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSWiki2.png). :(
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 15, 2014, 10:29:38 AM
... as in here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSWiki2.png). :(

It doesn't look too bad, actually.  ;)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 15, 2014, 10:31:40 AM
Uhhh... am I the only one who sees parts of the wiki in German?

EDIT: It also won't let me edit anything. Let's just hope it's a temporary thing, I'll see if my non-existent knowledge of how computers work will let me do anything...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 15, 2014, 10:56:45 AM
Uhhh... am I the only one who sees parts of the wiki in German?

EDIT: It also won't let me edit anything. Let's just hope it's a temporary thing, I'll see if my non-existent knowledge of how computers work will let me do anything...
No, they show up in German occasionally for me too. Not sure why, but it usually goes away.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 15, 2014, 11:55:21 AM
No, they show up in German occasionally for me too. Not sure why, but it usually goes away.

Maybe the wiki really likes JoB?  ;)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on November 15, 2014, 11:59:14 AM
Maybe the wiki really likes JoB?  ;)
Maybe it can sense that this person and his language embodies orderliness and organisational sophistication.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 15, 2014, 04:19:59 PM
Maybe it can sense that this person and his language embodies orderliness and organisational sophistication.
Maybe it's aiming for the effects that some other experts attribute to the German language (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11230870/Paw-print-found-as-search-continues-for-tiger-on-prowl-near-Paris.html). :P

On a more serious note, there's two mechanisms that come to my mind that could cause this:
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 15, 2014, 04:30:15 PM
Maybe it's aiming for the effects that some other experts attribute to the German language (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11230870/Paw-print-found-as-search-continues-for-tiger-on-prowl-near-Paris.html). :P

On a more serious note, there's two mechanisms that come to my mind that could cause this:
  • I do, of course, see parts of the wiki pages in German as soon as I log in - because I chose German as my interface language in the user settings (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Preferences). You might want to doublecheck yours.
  • There's some amount of server-side cacheing going on at Wikia. If, after checking your settings, you run into a partly-German page again, try the "action=purge" trick described here (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:JavaScript_and_CSS_Cheatsheet#Caching_issues) to see whether that (temporarily) fixes it.

Uhh... your link sends me to a page about paws and Paris...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 15, 2014, 05:09:32 PM
Uhh... your [first] link sends me to a page about paws and Paris...
About what was back then thought to be a tiger loose near Paris, yes. With this bit of helpful advice:

Tiger expert Gilbert Edelstein, from the Pinder circus, said the best response to coming face-to-face with the stripy beast, thought to weigh around 155 pounds, was to "scream as loud as possible."

"Even better, scream in German. The guttural sounds could scare him away," he told AFP news agency.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 15, 2014, 05:16:08 PM
It doesn't look too bad, actually.  ;)
Tried some reliefing and blurring ... how about now? (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSWiki2.png)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 15, 2014, 05:18:53 PM
Tried some reliefing and blurring ... how about now? (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSWiki2.png)

I say "I shall upload it tomorrow, as soon as I have everyone's consensus".
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 15, 2014, 05:22:23 PM
It looks good! I say go ahead :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 15, 2014, 07:46:58 PM
Apparent Wikia-default categories:
Blog posts (*), Browse (*)(**), Forums (*), General wiki templates, Help (*), Help desk (*), Template documentation (*), Templates (*), Watercooler (*).
(*) confirmed by version history; (**) edited
List re-comfirmed. FWIW, there's a non-editable "Starter Pages" (http://starter.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page) Wikia showing what a new Wikia's default content is.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 15, 2014, 09:22:55 PM
FWIW, there's a non-editable "Starter Pages" (http://starter.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page) Wikia showing what a new Wikia's default content is.
There also is a special Wikia to collect useful templates (http://templates.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia_Templates) for other Wikias to copy.

Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 16, 2014, 02:01:56 PM
I'm binge-reviewing the "article management templates" right now, most of them based on the Ambox template (http://templates.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox). Could some admin please copy the pertinent CSS (http://templates.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox/code.css) to the SSSS Wikia's Wikia.css (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:Wikia.css)?
Binge-dive into that repository done; I copied a bunch to the SSSS wiki, expanded the template-related category tree, and applied the templates on a series of pages. Still a handful bugs to be ironed out, sorry, the cacheing issue slows down my bug/fix/test/repeat cycle considerably ...

... I just notice that that CSS contains a couple explicit color definitions that don't sit well with our site design. Let me revisit that before installing it, please.

Two templates that I installed for future use: Category redirect (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Category_redirect) (to be used in streamlining the Übercategories) and Familytree (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Familytree#Example).
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on November 16, 2014, 02:03:15 PM
Oh, I uploaded that wordmark. Looks good, doesn't it?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 16, 2014, 02:28:38 PM
... I just notice that that CSS contains a couple explicit color definitions that don't sit well with our site design. Let me revisit that before installing it, please.
Done - just one grey background color really needed to be changed (to our alternate standard bgcolor).
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 17, 2014, 01:03:37 PM
Alright, proposal:
  • Undo the edit on "Browse" so as to restore the Wikia default categories.
  • Keep the genuine topical and all template-related categories (those are rather well-defined, even the ones from the "Stub" template).
  • Clean up the wannabe Übercategories (Comic, Content, Meta, "Story, Plot Points, Artwork"), replacing them with clearly defined ones (***), then make those subcategories of "Browse".
(***) I don't care much whether that's one global "Content" or a triptych of "Comic content"/"Comic meta"/"Real world and fandom", as long as it's clear which one to put a page/topic into.
FWIW, I had a look at a couple other Wikias. The majority of them has one top category for the wiki's actual content below "Browse", and most of those call it "Content". More specific types of content then have subcategories below that.

As of now, our Übercategories are "hierarchized" (is that a word, or do I need to take it out and shoot it?) as follows:
(Browse)
 |`-- Content
 |     |`-- Comic
 |     |      `-- Story, ...
 |      `-- World
 |           `-- (the topical categories)
  `-- Meta


Whaddy'all think about the following?
(Browse)
  `-- Content [of the wiki]
       |`-- SSSS [plot, Rash / Illness, ...]
       |     |`-- (the topical categories)
       |      `-- Meta [artwork, inspirations, print drives, ...]
        `-- Non-SSSS [aRTD, Minna, real-world Nordics, ...]

In case of doubt (e.g., "Languages" and "Flags" cover pre-Rash as well as post-Rash state of affairs, or a page explains something and continues to list nitpicks), prefer "SSSS" over "Non-SSSS" and "Meta", respectively.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 17, 2014, 02:46:29 PM
FWIW, I had a look at a couple other Wikias. The majority of them has one top category for the wiki's actual content below "Browse", and most of those call it "Content". More specific types of content then have subcategories below that.

As of now, our Übercategories are "hierarchized" (is that a word, or do I need to take it out and shoot it?) as follows:
(Browse)
 |`-- Content
 |     |`-- Comic
 |     |      `-- Story, ...
 |      `-- World
 |           `-- (the topical categories)
  `-- Meta


Whaddy'all think about the following?
(Browse)
  `-- Content [of the wiki]
       |`-- SSSS [plot, Rash / Illness, ...]
       |     |`-- (the topical categories)
       |      `-- Meta [artwork, inspirations, print drives, ...]
        `-- Non-SSSS [aRTD, Minna, real-world Nordics, ...]

In case of doubt (e.g., "Languages" and "Flags" cover pre-Rash as well as post-Rash state of affairs, or a page explains something and continues to list nitpicks), prefer "SSSS" over "Non-SSSS" and "Meta", respectively.

That seems okay, but I don't really understand the point of the Browse category...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 17, 2014, 04:24:15 PM
I don't really understand the point of the Browse category...
It's one of the categories installed by default and the root of the default category tree. I'ld venture a guess that a couple tools Wikia staff uses to maintain and support Wikias might have it hardcoded, and would malfunction if we were to mess with it. Hence my suggestion to merely undo KenoSarawas edit of it.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 17, 2014, 07:27:39 PM
Whaddy'all think about the following?
Amendment:
(Browse)
  `-- Content [of the wiki]
       |`-- SSSS [plot, Rash / Illness, ...]
       |     |`-- (the topical categories)
       |      `-- Meta [artwork, inspirations, print drives, ...]
       |`-- Non-SSSS [aRTD, Minna, real-world Nordics, ...]
        `-- Flagged
             `-- (the various auto-assigned categories when a template is
                 used to mark a page as "Candidate for deletion", having
                 "questionable content", "Article stub", etc. etc.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 18, 2014, 04:29:33 PM
1. [...] Could some admin please copy the pertinent CSS (http://templates.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox/code.css) to the SSSS Wikia's Wikia.css (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:Wikia.css)?
. . . . . . .

2. On the same occasion, I stumbled over the (also protected from my grubby fingers) image Wiki.png (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:Wiki.png). If you'ld like to replace that with an individual logo, I made a version of the Wordmark-to-be's "W" (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSW.png) in the proper size.
Replaced with a version that blends into the light yellow/orange background better.

Also, suggestion (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SW.ico) for an individual favicon (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Favicon).
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 18, 2014, 10:53:05 PM
. . . . . . .
Replaced with a version that blends into the light yellow/orange background better.

Also, suggestion (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SW.ico) for an individual favicon (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Favicon).

Sorry, totally meant to do this and forgot!

It is now done. Hopefully I did it right! Thanks again for all your help, JoB
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 19, 2014, 10:06:52 AM
Sorry, totally meant to do this and forgot!
It is now done. Hopefully I did it right!
[Checks changelogs] "This" = the CSS stuff, right?

You uploaded the first version (as copied from the Wikia Templates Wiki), so the Amboxes now have a grey background (example (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox)). The latest version of the template's CSS suggestion (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox/code.css) is changed (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AAmbox%2Fcode.css&diff=6219&oldid=6079) to the a-bit-darker-orange background that you can see around the "Template documentation follows" below. So, which one should the boxes use ... ?

(FWIW, the "wikia" logo in the example is the File:Wiki.png (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:Wiki.png) that I suggest having replaced with this image (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSW.png), but due to the blurred outline, that image should be adapted to the background it's put on.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 19, 2014, 12:09:42 PM
[Checks changelogs] "This" = the CSS stuff, right?

You uploaded the first version (as copied from the Wikia Templates Wiki), so the Amboxes now have a grey background (example (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox)). The latest version of the template's CSS suggestion (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Ambox/code.css) is changed (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AAmbox%2Fcode.css&diff=6219&oldid=6079) to the a-bit-darker-orange background that you can see around the "Template documentation follows" below. So, which one should the boxes use ... ?

(FWIW, the "wikia" logo in the example is the File:Wiki.png (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:Wiki.png) that I suggest having replaced with this image (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:SSSSW.png), but due to the blurred outline, that image should be adapted to the background it's put on.)

I... don't think it really matters too much, to be honest? They both look good...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 19, 2014, 10:18:39 PM
... did anyone already happen to see instructions on how we can replace the default icon and description in Wikia's search result lists (http://www.wikia.com/Special:Search?search=lalli&fulltext=Search)?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 19, 2014, 10:52:06 PM
... did anyone already happen to see instructions on how we can replace the default icon and description in Wikia's search result lists (http://www.wikia.com/Special:Search?search=lalli&fulltext=Search)?
Ah, currently disabled (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Promote). Just our luck, then. ???
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 19, 2014, 11:06:19 PM
Ah, currently disabled (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Promote). Just our luck, then. ???
Aw, boo. Although, if I understand correctly, this is so pages from your wiki show up on the main wikia site, yes? I wonder how many people would try to get to it from there. In fact, I wonder if there's any way to find out where most visitors to the wiki are coming from? As in, which site are they on right before this one? I know we don't have a lot of links floating around out there (something we should maybe fix, ie in the disqus comments), but I wonder if people google the name of the comic or get links from the forum or what...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 20, 2014, 08:29:06 AM
Although, if I understand correctly, this is so pages from your wiki show up on the main wikia site, yes?
For varying values of "show up", yes. The aspect that caught my eye was that main image + desc (and not the actual matching page!) are used to represent the wiki in the result lists when you do a keyword search on Wikias main site. According to the instructions, providing images + desc also is your entrance into having the front page, sliders, hubs etc. show your wiki. But it is, of course, unclear how much of all that will remain true once the new version goes live ...

I wonder how many people would try to get to it from there. In fact, I wonder if there's any way to find out where most visitors to the wiki are coming from? As in, which site are they on right before this one? I know we don't have a lot of links floating around out there (something we should maybe fix, ie in the disqus comments), but I wonder if people google the name of the comic or get links from the forum or what...
It seems that the Wikia staff is not too hot on helping with that (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:681879), sorry ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 20, 2014, 09:09:08 AM
Question: Would we like to have the maps (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Maps) (sort of a Google maps lookalike, but with the ability to put markers etc. atop a basic map image you uploaded yourself) enabled on the SSSS wiki, or shall we rather make do with the (enabled by default) ImageMap extension (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ImageMap) (single image, no zooming, no visible markers)?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 20, 2014, 09:41:33 AM
I'ld be interested in doing some experimentation with hotlinked "external" images (still residing on the wiki itself, but to be referenced by mechanisms that do not support an equivalent of the "internal links" you can put into a page). Could an admin please include a line reading
img[0-9]*\.wikia\.nocookie\.net
into the wiki's external image sites whitelist (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:External_image_whitelist)?

(See here (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:External_image_whitelist) for a more extensive example.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 25, 2014, 09:13:07 AM
[dusts off topic's microphone]

OK, I'm done with the tests and fixes (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:759347) around the "article management (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Article_management_templates)" and "category (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Category_templates)" templates I snarfed from the Wikia Templates Wiki. (The lists of "missing pages" etc. etc. being cached and recreated (only) daily slowed down the debugging considerably.) Anyone seeing some similar functionality/purpose that we should add?

A word on the use of the terms "wiki" and "wikia": The people of Wikia (the company) encourage the various communities they host to call the things "wikias" (note lowercase) instead of "wikis" (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:755050). The obvious reasoning behind that is a marketing ploy to make their "Wikia" trademark more known - which means that they will very likely not be OK with communities wanting to switch providers and take the name of "Something-Something Wikia" with them. Personally, I'll take that as a reason to stop calling ours the "SSSS Wikia"; YMMV.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on November 25, 2014, 09:42:46 AM
Is there a way to hide redirects from the special:allpages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages) page? They inflate the index somewhat.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 25, 2014, 09:57:09 AM
Is there a way to hide redirects from the special:allpages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages) page? They inflate the index somewhat.
If you mean the number of pages that's displayed on the front page, I'm pretty sure redirects aren't counted in that.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Fimbulvarg on November 25, 2014, 10:12:30 AM
If you mean the number of pages that's displayed on the front page, I'm pretty sure redirects aren't counted in that.
No, I mean the number of links on the all-pages index. Some are redundant because they are redirects (e.g. there's one link for Dalahasten and one for Dalahästen).
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on November 25, 2014, 10:40:25 AM
No, I mean the number of links on the all-pages index. Some are redundant because they are redirects (e.g. there's one link for Dalahasten and one for Dalahästen).
Ah, right. Sadly there's no way that I know of to hide those, since all pages does mean ALL PAGES. there's some in there that are default ones installed by Wikia. There is a list of JUST redirects, but I don't think there's one for non-redirect pages.

Unless JoB can shed some light on this?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 25, 2014, 11:18:23 AM
There is a list of JUST redirects, but I don't think there's one for non-redirect pages.
Unless JoB can shed some light on this?
I'm afraid that I haven't found a list of non-redirect pages so far, either. Redirects only (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:ListRedirects), no problemo. :(

The number stated on the Main Page ("84 pages on this wiki") is correct; AllPages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages) has 111 entries, including 27 redirects.

The actual redirect named ("Dalahasten" redirecting to "Dalahästen") is, however, not quite redundant; since we want to only write the name properly, with the special char, in the visible content, a reader who doesn't have said special character on his keyboard would be unable to do a successful search for the term. And since one form of "doing a search" for an entire page on a wiki is to enter the search term in the URL, providing the ASCII-only version as a (redirecting) page is IMHO the proper method. (And the redirect from "Main Page" to the actual homepage, generated in the course of Wikia initializing the wiki, is downright sacrosanct IIUC.)

There are other redirections in the SSSS wiki that we might want to remove due to lack of usefulness, though, starting with the ones created by KenoSarawa from scratch ("Tuuri" -> "Tuuri Hotakainen", "Giant" -> "Giants" etc.) or by means of a page rename ("The Paddlewheeler" -> "Paddlewheeler" and "The Timbercruiser" -> "Timbercruiser"; we might want to discuss which form to keep, though), and I might have found a method to obviate the "RedirectionToCategory ..." redirects I created, too.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 25, 2014, 12:24:53 PM
Oh, that. It was the only SSSS-themed name I could come up with, but I wanted to make every badge SSSS-themed. I DID ask for more suggestions, but no one ever gave me any! So if you have more suggestions, go ahead!
Hmmmm, I have a bit of a problem there because, as a run-of-the-mill user, Wikia doesn't show me a list of what badges already are in existence ...
Found instructions (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Achievements) and a a list of the default badges (http://badges.wikia.com/wiki/Badge_Types#Current_badges), will start pondering it.

May I suggest, though, that we shouldn't go quite as far as Encyclopedia SpongeBobia (http://spongebob.wikia.com/wiki/Special:AllPages?namespace=8&from=Acct_creation_throttle_hit&to=Admindashboard-header) ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 26, 2014, 02:08:04 PM
Found instructions (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Achievements) and a a list of the default badges (http://badges.wikia.com/wiki/Badge_Types#Current_badges), will start pondering it.
... well, can't say that I got flooded with inspiration, or stuck to the existing icon imagery in any way, but here goes ...

The Edit Track reminded me of the lowly skalds typing away as a scriptorium slave, so:
1- Pen to Parchment, 5 - Wrote a Paragraph, 10 - Filled a Page, 25 - Turned a Sheet, 50 - Completed a Chapter, 100 - Bound a Book, 250 - Completed a Series, 500 - Filled a Shelf, [next] - Made his own Library.

The Pictures Track got associated with the visions of mages:
1 - One-Vision Wonder, 5 - Promising Pupil, 10 - Starting Student, 25 - Accomplished Apprentice, 50 - Visionary in Formation, 100 - Midlife Mantic, 250 - Senior Seer, 500 - Pythia of the Nordics, [next] - Prophet of the Old Gods

The Category Track seems to correspond well to the more academic skalds doing analytic work:
1 - Fledgling Filer, 5 - Tabulator of Content, 10 - Figures Lister, 25 - Subsection Sorter, 50 - Flow of Thought, 100 - Topic Teller, 250 - Library System Designer, [next] - Polymath

I drew a blank on the Blog and Blog Comment tracks. We don't quite use the blogging features in the first place, though ...

The Wiki Love Track's requirement to keep working every single day made me associate farm work, where you go on for years without a single day of vacation, too. :) Hence:
5 - Office Hours Worker, 14 - Fortnight Farmhand, 30 - Harvest Helper, 60 - Sheep Shearer, 100 - Pig-Washer, 200 - Cattle Wrangler, 365 - Right-Hand Man, [next] - Farmer, [next] - Squire

The specials:
"Welcome to the Wiki" -> "Out of Decon", "Introduction" -> "Wrote his CV", "Stopping By to Say Hi" -> "Calling Mora" (where there's telephones), "The Creator" -> "Patient Zero", "Pounce!" -> "Lightning Strike Kitty", "Caffeinated" -> "Terror of the Typewriters", "Lucky Edit" -> "Smile of the Gods".

It's possible to rename the "achievement points" to some other unit, like Enc. SpongeBobia did to count "Patties". However, I don't have a good idea for now (let's see what our heroes will like once they got to do some lootin'), and it's apparently quite some work to get it all correct ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 28, 2014, 08:53:23 PM
and I might have found a method to obviate the "RedirectionToCategory ..." redirects I created, too.
Deployed, and it works. These redirects can be deleted.

Somewhat related topic: I made a "Books" disambiguation page, partly to get the hang of that feature. It promptly shows up in Special:LonelyPages (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:LonelyPages), which is irritating; however, articles are supposed not to link to dab pages (but directly to the correct page). Wikipedia seems to avoid that effect by, for every dab page "XYZ", creating a redirect "XYZ (disambiguation)" to it - redirects do not get listed on Special:LonelyPages. However, that'ld inflate the number of redirects again. Thoughts ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 05, 2014, 09:50:01 PM
Seeing that the SSSS Wiki is one of the "darker colored communities", should we (an admin) switch it to "version 3"?

http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Global_Navigation_Update
(http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:764753)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on December 06, 2014, 01:01:30 AM
Seeing that the SSSS Wiki is one of the "darker colored communities", should we (an admin) switch it to "version 3"?

http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Global_Navigation_Update
(http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:764753)
First of all, my apologies for the radio silence - I was travelling last week and trying to post on a forum using a tablet is a little difficult. But I am back now! :D Looking forward to the new chapter full of content that we can put into the wiki~

Regarding the new nav bar: this is the ugliest thing I've ever seen. Ugh!!! I wish there was some way to make it go away. I do agree that "Version 3" seems the least distracting but I'm not sure if they actually let you CHANGE which one you get... seems like everyone is stuck with the same annoying bar. I tried looking through all the admin settings to see how to change it but it doesn't show up anywhere :(
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 07, 2014, 10:49:47 AM
Regarding the new nav bar: this is the ugliest thing I've ever seen. Ugh!!!
I have to say that I have seen worse. Not from people with any hope to hold on to a job title anywhere close to "designer", though. ;)

The thing that does irk me, however, is their insistence that all wikis shall forcefully participate in this. We have eight active users (including two administrators) and the one who most likely has the most Wiki experience is, for crying out loud, KenoSarawa. What do they expect to happen to wikis with such limited know-how and manpower when they keep putting the onus of after"sales" support for the ever-shifting soft(ware) ground under their feet on them? They'll earn a reputation of "don't host your wiki on their farm before you have a couple hundred active users" IMHO.

I do agree that "Version 3" seems the least distracting but I'm not sure if they actually let you CHANGE which one you get [...] I tried looking through all the admin settings to see how to change it but it doesn't show up anywhere :(
Yeah, it seems that I misunderstood the (few) replies of Wikia staff in the comments that they're considering handing a bit of control back to the wiki admins as saying that a 1/2/3 switch is there right now. (And the more I read about how Wikia has acted in past instances of "forced changes nobody ever asked for", the likelier it seems to me that that'll never happen ... :( )
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on December 07, 2014, 12:34:06 PM
Yeah, it seems that I misunderstood the (few) replies of Wikia staff in the comments that they're considering handing a bit of control back to the wiki admins as saying that a 1/2/3 switch is there right now. (And the more I read about how Wikia has acted in past instances of "forced changes nobody ever asked for", the likelier it seems to me that that'll never happen ... :( )

Could we change the colors, at least? Is that an option?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 07, 2014, 01:25:21 PM
Could we change the colors, at least? Is that an option?
Not right now, and possibly never. There are CSS snippets floating around to "fix" the snowbar, but putting them into a wiki's global config is considered a violation of the Wikia terms and conditions.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on December 07, 2014, 02:16:01 PM
Not right now, and possibly never. There are CSS snippets floating around to "fix" the snowbar, but putting them into a wiki's global config is considered a violation of the Wikia terms and conditions.
*grumbles* I guess it's just something we'll have to live with... (I was about to say "for now" but it's more like "for the rest of our lives")
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 16, 2014, 09:29:43 PM
*grumbles* I guess it's just something we'll have to live with... (I was about to say "for now" but it's more like "for the rest of our lives")
Woo hoo! For their next trick, Wikia shall manhandle the entire article layout (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Prototype_for_a_new_article_layout)! Rejoyce, everybody!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on December 16, 2014, 09:34:12 PM
Woo hoo! For their next trick, Wikia shall manhandle the entire article layout (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Prototype_for_a_new_article_layout)! Rejoyce, everybody!
ohhhhhh my god >_< Whyyyy
Whyyyy

I don't understand
ugh
*throws things*
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on December 17, 2014, 05:10:28 PM
Woo hoo! For their next trick, Wikia shall manhandle the entire article layout (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Prototype_for_a_new_article_layout)! Rejoyce, everybody!

Oh, joy...

*follows the link to the Tardis Data Core in the link JoB provided*... Is that the layout? Because it's really ugly... I like this one, why do we have to change it?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 17, 2014, 07:20:09 PM
I like this one, why do we have to change it?
Right now, we don't and even can't. But given their track record with "experimental" updates, it's a fair bet that Wikia will flat out ignore hundreds of comments in protest of the change and shoehorn it into every Wikia wiki as soon as they're done "successfully testing" it.

And no, I didn't dare looking at the new layout with my adblocker turned off yet. According to some of the comments, the changes include ad banners that come floating into the article text .......
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 22, 2014, 11:03:26 AM
How did I manage to accidentally upload an old-ish screenshot onto the wiki? :-[

http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/File:20140913.upcoming.png

While I'm posting on the subject, maybe an admin could please mjölnir 87.jpg and Skald.png as well, they've both gotten replaced by edited and differently-named pictures in their "native" articles ...

http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:UnusedFiles
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on December 26, 2014, 04:17:48 PM

While I'm posting on the subject, maybe an admin could please mjölnir 87.jpg and Skald.png as well, they've both gotten replaced by edited and differently-named pictures in their "native" articles ...

http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:UnusedFiles

Done, Mjolnir'd.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 26, 2014, 04:40:47 PM
Quote from: SSSSWiki deletion log
21:18, December 26, 2014 Nimphy I (wall | contribs) deleted page File:20140913.upcoming.png (I'll miss this, but it was a Request by our most best contributor, not gonna question it)
Done, Mjolnir'd.
Thanks, and have fun with the fresh crate of irony you apparently got for Christmas. ;D

(It didn't happen to have a tag with a blue dot (http://www.sssscomic.com/comic.php?page=187) attached to it, did it?)
Title: News from the Wiki
Post by: JoB on January 30, 2015, 02:51:48 PM
Bulk update ... :

1. Wikia announced (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Global_Navigation_January_Update) some upcoming changes to the global navbar, namely, that it'll get shrunk to 7/8 the height and turn inverted+transparent when you scroll down the page (example at page top (http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/central/images/6/67/01-dark-wiki-logged-out-top.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150129215114) and scrolled down (http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/central/images/7/7a/02-dark-wiki-logged-out-scrolling.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150129215114) screenshots). On the flip side, they seem to have the "start a wikia" button and the user menu switch places, so you'll find yourself founding Yet Another Wikia (tm) when you actually wanted to log in. :-\ (No further news on the revamped article layout (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Prototype_for_a_new_article_layout) a.k.a. Venus so far.)

2. More than half of the Kastrup article (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Kastrup) is taken up by the description of the building our heroes are currently at, which IMHO suggests splitting it off into an article of its own. However, we still don't have a name other than "spot 24" for it. Any suggestions ... ?

3. No comment or worthwhile activity around the Dalahästen giant article (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Dalah%C3%A4sten_giant) since I dropped all sorts of "needs improvement" markers on it almost two months ago. Quite frankly, I don't see anything in it that we'ld want to move into another article, or preserve otherwise - it's a renarration of the comic top to bottom. Agree to wholesale delete ... ?

4. Speaking of deletions, in this case of redirects, (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:ListRedirects) may I repeat my suggestion to:
* delete the singular-to-plural ones (Beast, Giant, Skald, Troll),
* delete the first-to-full-name ones (Lalli, Tuuri),
* delete the three "RedirectionToCategory ..." ones (I replaced them with working direct links in the templates),
* discuss whether to keep the article-ful or article-less version of "(The) Paddlewheeler" and "(The) Timbercruiser",
* discuss whether we want to create "XYZ (disambiguation)" redirects to every (currently only one) disambiguation page "XYZ" (like Wikipedia does) to avoid the phony "lonely page" listings,
* keep the fifteen ASCII-to-special-characters redirects (as they're the only way for users who can't type in the special characters to search for the affected articles), and, of course,
* keep the "Main Page" redirection (part of a Wikia wiki's essential infrastructure).
Title: Re: News from the Wiki
Post by: Solovei on February 08, 2015, 01:37:36 PM
* delete the singular-to-plural ones (Beast, Giant, Skald, Troll),
* delete the first-to-full-name ones (Lalli, Tuuri),
* delete the three "RedirectionToCategory ..." ones (I replaced them with working direct links in the templates),

OKAY, finally did this. I am THE WORST admin, sorry guys.
I like that little table giving the links on the main page. Any thoughts on whether we should put the IRC information there as well?
Title: Re: News from the Wiki
Post by: JoB on February 11, 2015, 07:50:52 AM
Any thoughts on whether we should put the IRC information there as well?
I'm not using any of the chats, so I don't have much of an idea which subset to put there, not to mention that I'm not sure that there is an established syntax for hyperlinks to IRC servers ...

Someone edited the main characters' pages, including not only some details I'ld like to correct (*) but also getting a lot closer to outright renarration with the "History" sections. Thoughts ... ?

(*) In particular, implying that the Drogden tunnel is a route around the now-broken Öresundsbro and stating that "spot 24" is a public library.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: starfallz on February 13, 2015, 02:45:18 PM
Hopefully my addition of uniform things wasn't a problem?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Nimphy on February 13, 2015, 02:46:21 PM
*Nim suddenly remembered that there's a wiki* Ugh, I am the worst founder ever. I'll get to work...

Tomorrow.

Also, JoB, I like the new character pages. They're more complete, and as I meant them to be originally. Lots of wikis have a renrration of the events on the history section.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 13, 2015, 08:11:29 PM
I asked for technical advice (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:797035) on Community Central how to put a web form onto the wiki - namely, select location, year, and month from drop-down menus, click the "go" button, and get sent to http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen?month=11&year=2103 (http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen?month=11&year=2103) or whatever. It seems that such a feature would need an admin to setup and maintain. Would there be interest in that?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Sunflower on February 13, 2015, 08:42:01 PM
select location, year, and month from drop-down menus, click the "go" button, and get sent to http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen?month=11&year=2103 (http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen?month=11&year=2103) or whatever. It seems that such a feature would need an admin to setup and maintain. Would there be interest in that?

This is so awesome, I can't tell you.  Could we get an astronomical calendar like this one on the Fan-Forum as well?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on February 14, 2015, 01:03:29 AM
I asked for technical advice (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:797035) on Community Central how to put a web form onto the wiki - namely, select location, year, and month from drop-down menus, click the "go" button, and get sent to http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen?month=11&year=2103 (http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen?month=11&year=2103) or whatever. It seems that such a feature would need an admin to setup and maintain. Would there be interest in that?

It's a neat thing for sure, but I'm not sure how would be used on the wiki...? Could you explain it a bit more?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 14, 2015, 11:30:46 AM
It's a neat thing for sure, but I'm not sure how would be used on the wiki...? Could you explain it a bit more?
a) I just notice that the city parameter isn't part of the URL's input part, so no way to accept that from a selector. >:(
b) Right now I don't have access to a web server I could put static HTML on. ??? Can you save the following quick demo in a *.html file and point your browser at it?

Code: [Select]
<HTML><BODY><FORM METHOD="GET" ACTION="http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen">
        See sunrise/sunset etc. data for Copenhagen in
        <SELECT NAME="month">
                <OPTION VALUE="01">January</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="02">February</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="03">March</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="04">April</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="05">May</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="06">June</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="07">July</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="08">August</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="09">September</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="10">[turn of year]</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="10">October</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="11" SELECTED>November</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="12">December</OPTION>
        </SELECT>
        <SELECT NAME="year">
                <OPTION VALUE="2013">2013 (years -1/0)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2014">2014 (years 0/1)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2015">2015 (years 1/2)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2016">2016 (years 2/3)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2103" SELECTED>2103 (years 89/90)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2104">2104 (years 90/91)</OPTION>
        </SELECT>
        <INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" VALUE="go">
</FORM></BODY></HTML>
Title: Re: Wiki discussion - Cannot login
Post by: FrogEater on February 17, 2015, 09:02:28 AM
I tried to log into the wiki, not remembering whether I have an acoount or not, and something strange happens :
- when I use the Login screen (assuming I have an account  :D), I'm told that FrogEater is unknown
- when I use the Sign In screen (assuming I don't have an account  :-X), I'm told that there already is a FrogEater user.

So ? Should I doubt my own existence ? Do I have an account or not ? Should I just create a new one with a slightly different name? Questions, questions, questions....
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on February 17, 2015, 10:40:32 AM
a) I just notice that the city parameter isn't part of the URL's input part, so no way to accept that from a selector. >:(
b) Right now I don't have access to a web server I could put static HTML on. ??? Can you save the following quick demo in a *.html file and point your browser at it?

Code: [Select]
<HTML><BODY><FORM METHOD="GET" ACTION="http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/denmark/copenhagen">
        See sunrise/sunset etc. data for Copenhagen in
        <SELECT NAME="month">
                <OPTION VALUE="01">January</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="02">February</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="03">March</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="04">April</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="05">May</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="06">June</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="07">July</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="08">August</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="09">September</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="10">[turn of year]</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="10">October</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="11" SELECTED>November</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="12">December</OPTION>
        </SELECT>
        <SELECT NAME="year">
                <OPTION VALUE="2013">2013 (years -1/0)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2014">2014 (years 0/1)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2015">2015 (years 1/2)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2016">2016 (years 2/3)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2103" SELECTED>2103 (years 89/90)</OPTION>
                <OPTION VALUE="2104">2104 (years 90/91)</OPTION>
        </SELECT>
        <INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" VALUE="go">
</FORM></BODY></HTML>

Um, I mean, what would we use it FOR?

I tried to log into the wiki, not remembering whether I have an acoount or not, and something strange happens :
- when I use the Login screen (assuming I have an account  :D), I'm told that FrogEater is unknown
- when I use the Sign In screen (assuming I don't have an account  :-X), I'm told that there already is a FrogEater user.

So ? Should I doubt my own existence ? Do I have an account or not ? Should I just create a new one with a slightly different name? Questions, questions, questions....
Account creation is mostly the forte of the main site, Wikia, so we have no control over it. Your name doesn't show up in the list of contributing users, so I'm not sure what you could do...

I THINK  that same thing happened to JoB? Which is why he is JoB2 on the wiki?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion - Cannot login
Post by: JoB on February 17, 2015, 11:07:33 AM
I tried to log into the wiki, not remembering whether I have an acoount or not, and something strange happens :
- when I use the Login screen (assuming I have an account  :D), I'm told that FrogEater is unknown
- when I use the Sign In screen (assuming I don't have an account  :-X), I'm told that there already is a FrogEater user.

So ? Should I doubt my own existence ? Do I have an account or not ? Should I just create a new one with a slightly different name? Questions, questions, questions....
Please note that

According to what I can see with a bit of trial and error, there is indeed no FrogEater (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:FrogEater), but a Frogeater (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:Frogeater), though the latter one seems to never have made any contribution to the SSSS Wiki.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 17, 2015, 11:20:53 AM
Um, I mean, what would we use it FOR?
Hmmmm, it's a tool to determine how many hours/minutes of sunlight/danger our protagonists may have left in whatever situation they're currently in in the comic. Like, wild analogy, the historical info about Kastrup Fortet (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Kastrup#Kastrup_Fortet) helps us speculate how safe their current position is ... After all, safety being dependent on temps and sunlight (and special effects like having no sun at all during the winter if you're sufficiently far North) is a major plot point ...

I THINK  that same thing happened to JoB? Which is why he is JoB2 on the wiki?
I tried to register+login as "JoB" and that somehow didn't work - as in, never. (I distinctly remember that it did not tell me that the username was already taken, though.) Like with "Frogeater" above, the look of the "JoB" user's page suggests that it has some form of existence. However, I registered as "JoB2" the same day, never having successfully logged in as "JoB".
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: FrogEater on February 17, 2015, 11:32:36 AM
Thanks to both of you :) I will create a slightly different username, then.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 17, 2015, 03:42:22 PM
Thanks to both of you :) I will create a slightly different username, then.
Gone Latin (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:RanaVore), didn'tcha? ;)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 19, 2015, 06:43:22 PM
There has been a request on the wiki whether we would want to add an article about "Magic" alongside "Mages". In a similar vein, I looked at "Mages" today, pondering how I might insert the facts about magic that we have so far - which mostly are about Lallis dreamworlds, with no info whether these are characteristic of all mages, just Finnish ones, or maybe even specific to Lalli (and Braidy?) alone. Can't say that I have much of an idea yet how to integrate that. Thoughts ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Sunflower on February 19, 2015, 08:11:22 PM
There has been a request on the wiki whether we would want to add an article about "Magic" alongside "Mages". In a similar vein, I looked at "Mages" today, pondering how I might insert the facts about magic that we have so far - which mostly are about Lallis dreamworlds, with no info whether these are characteristic of all mages, just Finnish ones, or maybe even specific to Lalli (and Braidy?) alone. Can't say that I have much of an idea yet how to integrate that. Thoughts ... ?

I'm probably talking out of line here since I haven't done anything on the Wiki, but...  what about a provisional article specifically headed "Speculation about Lalli's dreamworlds" as a sub-article to Mages?  That way, once you get more info, you can either confirm that Lalli's experience is typical of all Finnish mages (only Onni so far), or maybe *all* mages (incl. Braidy), or uniquely his.  And *then* slot it properly.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 20, 2015, 07:34:18 AM
what about a provisional article specifically headed "Speculation about Lalli's dreamworlds" as a sub-article to Mages?
It sure is a possibility, but there may be drawbacks:
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: FrogEater on February 22, 2015, 05:36:06 PM
Gone Latin, genau !
Quote
Plain users cannot delete articles (or rename them short of the old name bIecoming a redirect, cluttering the article list)
Does that mean that even the initial author doesn't have any rights on the article?
If this is the case, what about giving this article a 'stable', definitive title (eg 'Magic') and have it begin with a warning in huge bold letters 'This article, as of page 273 of the comic, is only a compilation of a few facts ' ? (the important word here is 'facts')
Or, more simply, the whole thing could be delayed until we have a more solid knowledge.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 23, 2015, 10:53:59 AM
Does that mean that even the initial author doesn't have any rights on the article?
The only "rights" that a wiki like ours recognizes are copyrights. The wiki in and of itself is being put under CC-BY-SA (http://www.wikia.com/Licensing) the moment material gets posted, though it might include material with less permissive copyrights as long as its use is covered by "fair use" provisions (which I claim whenever I post images from aRTD, as Minnas OK to use her art on the wiki was specifically for SSSS).

Exclusive "rights" to maintaining a page - nope. Wikia explicitly asks that even restriction to logged-in editing, while technically possible, should be avoided and vandalism just be reverted when it occurs. (There are straightforward "undo" links in the page's version history.)

If this is the case, what about giving this article a 'stable', definitive title (eg 'Magic') and have it begin with a warning in huge bold letters 'This article, as of page 273 of the comic, is only a compilation of a few facts ' ? (the important word here is 'facts')
Or, more simply, the whole thing could be delayed until we have a more solid knowledge.
Pretty much everything we wrote up on the wiki is provisional and pending further, even contradictory, info from Minna; and yes, having things stated as "fact" for the storyverse (or obviously deduced from that) is the wiki's guideline, anyway. There are several different technical implementations of working around the uncertainty, though. From "The Rash" and "The Illness" being separate articles (as it hasn't been stated yet that they are indeed identical) to somewhat awkward phrasing to explicitly saying "we don't know yet" to empty sections (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Articles_with_Empty_Sections) to redlinks (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WantedPages) (which indicate that we know that something's a topic that'll merit its own article, if only we had the knowledge to write it) ...

Back to the topic at hand, it's not like we can avoid renamings and redirections (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:ListRedirects) altogether, but.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: FrogEater on February 23, 2015, 11:05:06 AM
Thank you for all these enlightments. Practically speaking, do you feel I can write some kind of a stub, draft, provisional article... or would it be wiser to wait a little more?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 23, 2015, 12:50:01 PM
Thank you for all these enlightments. Practically speaking, do you feel I can write some kind of a stub, draft, provisional article... or would it be wiser to wait a little more?
I can't really answer that because I don't know what you intend to put into the article (and because I know too well how much bolstering to make an article look decently sized can be done :P ) in the first place. (Speaking of bolstering, I wrote a dedicated article on the Sielulintu (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Sielulintu) in the meantime.)

What I can say is that the description of magic as currently included into the "Mages" page heavily relies on the info pages on Mages, to the point of completely omitting most "magic" features shown on Lalli in the meantime, so some rewrite seems quite necessary. The thing I sorta fear is that if someone is to present that all in one article, the "magic" described would appear ... contradictory? amorphous? nondescript?

Having that said, I would be in favor of having a new article "Magic" (a concept important enough in SSSS to certainly warrant an article of its own in the long run) and we could agree on having that and an unchanged description of magic in "Mages" in parallel until we feel confident to have "Mages" just refer to "Magic" instead.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: FrogEater on February 23, 2015, 01:37:46 PM
Sounds sensible. 'Mages' is the only entry for which Minna gave some information. 'Magic', OTOH, can be only pure analysis and inferences from what we saw so far (which means little...). Well, better to wait some more time, then.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 23, 2015, 04:01:20 PM
Well, better to wait some more time, then.
... umh ... that's not what I suggested ... ? ??? (Not that you'ld be bound by that in any way.)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: FrogEater on February 23, 2015, 05:00:31 PM
:) I understood it was not your suggestion - it's only mine. Let's just say that
1- I don't have as much time for myself as I could wisht, these days
2- the thing probably needs some more polishing
But I will give it a try.
(after all, it's not as if we were debating over pressing or not the Big Dreadful Button in the Underground Bunker of Last Chance)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on March 24, 2015, 11:32:03 PM
Hey guys, remember how we still have a wiki? :D

Anyway, quick question - I tried to link Braidy/Reynir's entry to Arni's... and I  don't think it worked? It goes to the prologue page but not to the section with his name. I wonder if it's because it has the weird icelandic characters in it?

So if anyone could look into this, that would be great.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on March 25, 2015, 03:18:53 PM
Hey guys, remember how we still have a wiki? :D

Anyway, quick question - I tried to link Braidy/Reynir's entry to Arni's... and I  don't think it worked? It goes to the prologue page but not to the section with his name. I wonder if it's because it has the weird icelandic characters in it?

So if anyone could look into this, that would be great.
For whatever reason, the link pointed to

Prologue Characters#C3.81rni .C3.9E.C3.B3r Reynisson

instead of

Prologue Characters#.C3.81rni .C3.9E.C3.B3r Reynisson

- fixed.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on March 25, 2015, 05:25:39 PM
For whatever reason, the link pointed to

Prologue Characters#C3.81rni .C3.9E.C3.B3r Reynisson

instead of

Prologue Characters#.C3.81rni .C3.9E.C3.B3r Reynisson

- fixed.

Huh, that's odd, I wonder how that period got in there. Thanks though! :)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on April 28, 2015, 05:27:32 PM
Let me summarize a bunch of news from Wikia's Community Central:

Wikia wants to cater for readers on mobile devices (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Hotsoup.6891/Best_Practices:_Mobile_Friendly_Main_Pages). If you use the Classic Editor to edit a page (in visual mode), you have two (freaking huge) buttons off the right that give you a preview of what the page'll look like on "a mobile device" and "a desktop", respectively. Instructions on how to improve pages for mobile viewing are supposedly accumulating as we speak, the information on how urgently you should follow them apparently remains stuck at "half the page views of Wikia as a whole happen on mobile devices".

Also for the Classic Editor, but in source mode, Wikia released an update (sans announcement) introducing syntax highlighting. Note that the source mode of the Visual Editor remains unchanged.

Remember the "promote" function that was already shut down when we discovered it? There's a planned successor called "Hero Image (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ducksoup/Sprucing_up_your_Main_Page:_Introducing_the_Hero_Image)" in beta now. Don't ask me what it does or how to use it, I seem to be unable to locate word one about those minor details in Ducksoup's quacking. :(

The Visual Editor (in visual mode) got some more tooling (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ducksoup/Visual_Editor_Gets_an_Update), part of that being that it reacts "appropriately" when you start typing Wikitext into it. Today I noticed that, when I typed Wikitext ("{{" to include a template) into an image caption, the editor lets me select the template, and then plain turns unresponsive. ::) Needs some work IMHO ...

Remember that they announced a complete revamp of the pages' layout? Rejoice, it'll come piecemeal (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Layout_Changes:_Breakpoints_and_Typography) and we'll possibly have to fix stuff repeatedly. Yay.

One of those changes that's already out there is new sharing buttons (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Gcheung28/New_sharing_options_on_Wikia) (which is what I noticed changed, and prompted me to look at Community Central again). Right now, Wikia is getting a lot of [ahem] feedback on how the placement of old and new buttons is inconsistent and wastes space, and lo, they say they'll have a look at it. So things will likely change again.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on April 28, 2015, 06:24:40 PM
Let me summarize a bunch of news from Wikia's Community Central:

Wikia wants to cater for readers on mobile devices (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Hotsoup.6891/Best_Practices:_Mobile_Friendly_Main_Pages). If you use the Classic Editor to edit a page (in visual mode), you have two (freaking huge) buttons off the right that give you a preview of what the page'll look like on "a mobile device" and "a desktop", respectively. Instructions on how to improve pages for mobile viewing are supposedly accumulating as we speak, the information on how urgently you should follow them apparently remains stuck at "half the page views of Wikia as a whole happen on mobile devices".

Also for the Classic Editor, but in source mode, Wikia released an update (sans announcement) introducing syntax highlighting. Note that the source mode of the Visual Editor remains unchanged.

Remember the "promote" function that was already shut down when we discovered it? There's a planned successor called "Hero Image (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ducksoup/Sprucing_up_your_Main_Page:_Introducing_the_Hero_Image)" in beta now. Don't ask me what it does or how to use it, I seem to be unable to locate word one about those minor details in Ducksoup's quacking. :(

The Visual Editor (in visual mode) got some more tooling (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ducksoup/Visual_Editor_Gets_an_Update), part of that being that it reacts "appropriately" when you start typing Wikitext into it. Today I noticed that, when I typed Wikitext ("{{" to include a template) into an image caption, the editor lets me select the template, and then plain turns unresponsive. ::) Needs some work IMHO ...

Remember that they announced a complete revamp of the pages' layout? Rejoice, it'll come piecemeal (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Layout_Changes:_Breakpoints_and_Typography) and we'll possibly have to fix stuff repeatedly. Yay.

One of those changes that's already out there is new sharing buttons (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Gcheung28/New_sharing_options_on_Wikia) (which is what I noticed changed, and prompted me to look at Community Central again). Right now, Wikia is getting a lot of [ahem] feedback on how the placement of old and new buttons is inconsistent and wastes space, and lo, they say they'll have a look at it. So things will likely change again.

First of all, thanks JoB for keeping abreast of all the developments on the Wikia side of things!
As far as I can tell the Hero Image thing is similar to a cover image like on Facebook or Twitter.

In regards to the mobile views, is this something we want to invest time in? Maybe we could throw up a poll or something and see how many people actually use tablets/phones to check the wiki...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on April 29, 2015, 11:06:46 AM
In regards to the mobile views, is this something we want to invest time in?
"Want to invest time in"? I'm under the impression that "cater to mobile" is the overwhelming driving force behind Wikia coming up with all those mandatory design changes, so we're in on at least part of the ride whether we want to or not ...

(Other than that, I have no talent in graphics or UI design or whatever and wouldn't have the slightest what to improve for mobile users in the first place, short of "entire page refuses to display" or somesuch.)

Maybe we could throw up a poll or something and see how many people actually use tablets/phones to check the wiki...
Wikia has the numbers, and isn't willing to reveal even the total number of page view, visitors etc. of individual wikis, as far as I can tell ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on June 16, 2015, 10:02:47 PM
FYI: Today on the wiki, there was a short discussion about the variant of English (BrE, AmE, ...?) for articles. I don't think that we need that pinpointed right now, maybe not ever, but I'ld like to solicit your opinions just to have a Meinungsbild at hand.

I thought that the comic itself - the most authoritative guideline there is, I suppose - is somewhat ambivalent on the matter, and scanning the most recent pages for confirmation, there indeed is an AmE "organize" on p. 307 and a BrE "defenceless" on p. 330.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on June 25, 2015, 01:25:38 AM
I have a request:

Could someone who has a better understanding of how radio works amend this page http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/%C3%96resundsbro_base#Facilities to include the stuff on radio communication and the switchboards we saw in the comic?

Tack!
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on June 25, 2015, 05:03:49 PM
Could someone who has a better understanding of how radio works amend [the Öresundsbro base] page [...] to include the stuff on radio communication and the switchboards we saw in the comic?
... I tried.

Upon logging in (which activates my selection of the German language for the "controls"), Wikia showed me an announcement that the updated layout shall be activated for Wikias in German language on 01-Jul, having supposedly been turned on for the English ones a couple weeks ago. Can't say that I noticed any difference, but then again, the announcement says that the new "breakpoints" should not have any effect unless you're viewing the site in a browser pane more than 1500 pixels wide. (My laptop has a 1366x768 display.) Anyone ... ?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ParanormalAndroid on June 25, 2015, 05:15:46 PM
... I tried.

Upon logging in (which activates my selection of the German language for the "controls"), Wikia showed me an announcement that the updated layout shall be activated for Wikias in German language on 01-Jul, having supposedly been turned on for the English ones a couple weeks ago. Can't say that I noticed any difference, but then again, the announcement says that the new "breakpoints" should not have any effect unless you're viewing the site in a browser pane more than 1500 pixels wide. (My laptop has a 1366x768 display.) Anyone ... ?
Same display size here, can't help, sorry.
New computer in about a week or so with a bigger display though, so I'll look then I suppose.
As for radios, I only have a vague idea of how they even work, so.. Sorry again.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: Solovei on June 26, 2015, 12:21:42 AM
... I tried.

Upon logging in (which activates my selection of the German language for the "controls"), Wikia showed me an announcement that the updated layout shall be activated for Wikias in German language on 01-Jul, having supposedly been turned on for the English ones a couple weeks ago. Can't say that I noticed any difference, but then again, the announcement says that the new "breakpoints" should not have any effect unless you're viewing the site in a browser pane more than 1500 pixels wide. (My laptop has a 1366x768 display.) Anyone ... ?

It looks great, JoB! :D Exactly what I had in mind~

As for the resolution, I'm afraid I can't help either, I've got the same resolution. I could try hooking this thing up to the TV via HDMI and check that way?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on July 03, 2015, 01:53:39 PM
Ummmhhhhh ...

Today I came across hints that Wikia is working on a replacement for infoboxes. (FWIW, it took me quite a while to find the official announcement here (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:841717), and no, the 40-days-old links to "examples" don't work for me, either. >:( ) In the discussion below, there's a nifty trick to have your "desktop" client display the pages like they'ld appear on a "mobile" one: Just append "?useskin=wikiamobile" to the URL.

Which brings me to my actual topic: SSSS Wiki pages apparently look nowhere like *I* see them as soon as someone reads them on a mobile device. For example, the desktop version of the aRTD page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/A_Redtail%27s_Dream?useskin=wikia) has a manageable size thanks to collapsed parts, but those happen not to be collapsed anymore in the mobile version (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/A_Redtail%27s_Dream?useskin=wikiamobile). And it seems that when you read up on some character on a mobile client (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Tuuri_Hotakainen?useskin=wikiamobile), the flags in the fold-out part of the infobox plain don't work. And the fold-out table of the pages' content remains empty for me. And color me wondering why "mobile clients" of today would need the entire color choices suppressed and replaced with b+w ... !?

... so, what should we do about that? Do we even have enough people with mobile clients to pinpoint what differences are really there, and which are an artifact of me displaying the "mobile version" on what is not at all a mobile client?

(Edit: Oh, those links weren't meant to provide "before" and "after" versions in the first place, only "after - source" and "after - result". Silly me. ::) )

(Edit2: OK, lookie here for the visible effect of the infobox makeover: standard Wikia infobox template (http://starter.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_character#Samples) (which our wiki uses essentially unchanged), PortableInfobox version (http://templates.wikia.com/wiki/Template:PortableInfobox_advanced#Example).)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 28, 2015, 08:21:02 PM
Today I came across hints that Wikia is working on a replacement for infoboxes. (FWIW, it took me quite a while to find the official announcement here (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:841717), and no, the 40-days-old links to "examples" don't work for me, either. >:( ) In the discussion below, there's a nifty trick to have your "desktop" client display the pages like they'ld appear on a "mobile" one: Just append "?useskin=wikiamobile" to the URL.
[...]
(Edit2: OK, lookie here for the visible effect of the infobox makeover: standard Wikia infobox template (http://starter.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_character#Samples) (which our wiki uses essentially unchanged), PortableInfobox version (http://templates.wikia.com/wiki/Template:PortableInfobox_advanced#Example).)
I dared browse Wikias announcements again today (and spent half an evening adding "types" to all our templates (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:DaNASCAT/Template_Types:_A_Smarter_Categorization_System)). They proceeded with those plans, one side effect being that the new "you might want to check these pages" tool "pages without infoboxes (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Insights/pageswithoutinfobox)" essentially lists ALL our pages, as they don't use the "approved" kind of infoboxes.

There is a tool supposedly automating conversion of old infoboxes into portable ones, but I'll be darned if I'll use that without any idea of what side effects might result from the conversion. :-\

So, question to y'all before I start with any actual modification there: Whaddya think about the layout changes that appear by default with the new system (in particular, info in two lines instead of two columns)? My understanding so far is that it is possible (though it does require admin rights) to revert at least partially to the original layout ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on November 29, 2015, 12:00:39 PM
They proceeded with those plans, one side effect being that the new "you might want to check these pages" tool "pages without infoboxes (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Insights/pageswithoutinfobox)" essentially lists ALL our pages, as they don't use the "approved" kind of infoboxes.

So, question to y'all before I start with any actual modification there: Whaddya think about the layout changes that appear by default with the new system (in particular, info in two lines instead of two columns)? My understanding so far is that it is possible (though it does require admin rights) to revert at least partially to the original layout ...
OK, upon reading into the material, things look a bit better. Assigning our infoboxes the type of "infobox" (and waiting for the next cache run) was enough to take the pages that have them off the "no infobox" list, and it seems that two columns is still the default for the new infoboxes; they're just so fond of the new two-lines layout that all their examples happen to use that. ::)

Conversion looks rather straightforward in other respects, too. (The portable infoboxes explicitly still allow the use of parser functions, like the "#if:" I used in the "person" infobox template.) The one thing that IMHO might still need admin intervention is coloration - that's buried someplace in the global CSS, possibly a different setting than the one giving the current infoboxes their coloration.

I'll likely introduce some new infobox types later on to further reduce the "no infobox" naglist, too. Types to match the "Creatures", "Locations", and "Professions" categories would be first, I think ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 05, 2015, 12:39:04 PM
I now got a demo of both current and new infoboxes on my profile page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2). In a nutshell: A bit wider, some changed font/paragraph properties around the image, shaded (blocks of) background instead of frames to mark the tabular layout. Could probably all be addressed if one has admin rights to edit the site CSS.

... so, any opinions on how I should proceed with the makeover?

In other news, Wikia introduced another update the past week supposedly only changing the pages' titles (as appearing in the tabs and window frame of one's browser, and supposedly changing for better SEO). We AFAIK never fiddled with those, and I don't remember things being different before, so ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 08, 2015, 04:17:01 PM
Ah, lovely. We have massive photo-laden ad bars now. :-X

Edit: Or did they just now manage to work around my ad blocker?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 13, 2015, 09:54:55 AM
I now got a demo of both current and new infoboxes on my profile page (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2). In a nutshell: A bit wider, some changed font/paragraph properties around the image, shaded (blocks of) background instead of frames to mark the tabular layout. Could probably all be addressed if one has admin rights to edit the site CSS.

... so, any opinions on how I should proceed with the makeover?
Slight change of plan: Since having just two infoboxes on my profile page already messed up the layout, it now has a list of links to PI drafts (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/User:JoB2#Portable_Infobox_Templates) instead. In order to make those show the draft version, I'll have to include the documentation into the drafts themselves - which is a good thing, I guess, as the separate "/doc" subpages we're using so far have been deprecated for quite a while.

So, still everyone, and admins in particular, invited to check out the new looks and comment here ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: ParanormalAndroid on December 13, 2015, 04:30:21 PM
Have to say, I don't think any major Wikia updates have actually done much good in ages.
Remember when they introduced that new editing method? The one that was actually less capable than rich-text that they'd used beforehand with no trouble?
It's much like that.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 13, 2015, 08:10:03 PM
Have to say, I don't think any major Wikia updates have actually done much good in ages.
Remember when they introduced that new editing method? The one that was actually less capable than rich-text that they'd used beforehand with no trouble?
It's much like that.
I started using Wikia when the SSSS Wiki was set up, which was pretty much at the same time this forum was founded; both the "Classic Editor" (with its "visual mode") and the "Visual Editor" were already in existence at that time, so no, I cannot actually remember that. I note that most of the power users (still?) use "source mode" (Wikitext) editing, though.

First forced update I've witnessed was the Global Nav Toolbar ... which still clashes with dark-color-themed wiki(a)s like ours.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 29, 2015, 12:19:51 PM
For the records: Wikia is breaking out a special feature (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Rupert_Giles/Introducing_Curated_Main_Pages) to have wikis have a completely different main page on mobile devices than is being shown on desktops. The controls are entirely stashed away in admin-only land, so I cannot even tell whether that feature has already arrived in our wiki or not, much less get an idea of whether and how we might want to use it ...

That reminds me, however, that IIUC the couple "spoiler" templates I made flat out don't work in the mobile skin. Would someone like to comment on how horrible the article that use them (currently listed partly here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:HiddenText) and partly here (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:HiddenWords)) do look on a mobile?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on January 17, 2016, 01:13:59 PM
I went ahead and replaced the preexisting-but-unused nonportable templates:

Template:Infobox
Template:Infobox episode
Template:Infobox quest
Template:Infobox item
Template:Infobox book
Template:Infobox character
Template:Infobox album

with the drafts I had made of portable versions. That means that for every "Template:Infobox foobar", there's now the previous version's documentation subpage, "Template:Infobox foobar/doc", uselessly dangling around. Could an admin please delete those?

Two actually used yet-nonportable infobox templates (location and person) still to be dealt with.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on January 21, 2016, 04:44:14 PM
Two actually used yet-nonportable infobox templates (location and person) still to be dealt with.
Done deal(ing), ".../doc" subpages still waiting for urbicande's nukes admin deletia powers ...
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on January 31, 2016, 10:25:28 AM
I just noticed that after switching to the new "portable" infoboxes, we now have a marked difference between their design and that of our navboxes (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Templates?type=navbox). I don't have the slightest yet how I would go about adapting the latter to the former, but: Is that something I should dive into?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on February 07, 2016, 06:26:44 PM
... when exactly did Wikia stop updating the cache daily (which was already a bit on the "not often enough" side in certain multi-page-fixin' cases)? >:(

(http://i.imgur.com/JeQbtvW.png)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on January 19, 2019, 08:38:50 PM
FYI: Fandom (formerly Wikia) has announced (http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Fandom_domain_migration) that they will migrate nearly all Fandom sites (Wikias / wikis hosted by Wikia), including the SSSS Wiki (http://sssscomic.wikia.com/wiki/Stand_Still,_Stay_Silent_Wiki), from their [name].wikia.com domain name to [samename??].fandom.com over the next couple weeks. They also say that requests for the old domains will get redirected to the new one ... for however long they feel like it, I suppose, and IMHO very likely not to be concluded with a "please update your bookmarks" splash page phase.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 27, 2020, 05:54:55 AM
FYI, Fandom has begun(!) to migrate the SSSS Wiki to the "Unified Community Platform (UCP) (https://community.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:MisterWoodhouse/The_first_migrations_to_the_Unified_Community_Platform)", a move that they openly admit to be likely to seriously break their own codebase, not to mention individual wiki's oddities.
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: wavewright62 on December 30, 2020, 07:53:24 PM
 :siv: I admit to knowing next to nothing about what's under the bonnet of these things. Some links are to SSSS pages, but some stuff (like pictures) is loaded directly into the site. There also seem to be some styling bits. How will these fare?
In general, is there something I can help with, to prepare for a more seamless migration?
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on December 31, 2020, 03:57:20 AM
:siv: I admit to knowing next to nothing about what's under the bonnet of these things. Some links are to SSSS pages, but some stuff (like pictures) is loaded directly into the site. There also seem to be some styling bits. How will these fare?
In general, is there something I can help with, to prepare for a more seamless migration?
... I guess I should add a larger perspective to all this first. The SSSS Wiki has been created on the Wikia platform, nowadays Fandom, a hoster offering free wikis. That happened at roughly the same time this forum was created, and you used to see the same people active on both.

However, while the entire forum including SMF is maintained by ourselves, major updates of the Fandom platform happen whenever it fits Fandom's interests. They have a history of going for market share and support for mobile clients, by forcing major updates upon all the wikis on their platform, which invariably turn out to not be as hassle-free as stated, and turning a deaf ear to the complaints of many existing users about all the stuff that suddenly works worse, slower, or not at all with the specific wikis these users are invested in.

Do this kind of thing often enough, and the wikis that do not have a large user base - because they're nascent, or "genuinely small" - will just give up, seeing that "fix Fandom's updates" eats up all the manpower they can muster, and would rather use to work on improving their wiki. Which is what I think happened to the SSSS Wiki. With limited manpower, you want stability and low maintenance from your underlying platform, not a constant hunt for top-of-the-line bells and whistles that are too unwieldy to use yourself.

So, what's happening right now is that Fandom is forcefully rolling out yet another such update (to get the former Wikia/Fandom and Gamepedia "worlds" onto a single, up-to-date software base), and the only thing to do in the short term is to keep an eye on the breakage ensuing for the SSSS wiki, and try to fix what we can after the fact.

For a more long-term perspective, the SSSS wiki has been "orphaned" (creator's account turned inactive) for a long time and we're locked out of certain possibilities due to that. (One particular example is that the wiki pages' top bar used to have a paler orange for a background, rather than making the "W" of the logo:
(https://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20141116183216/sssscomic/images/8/89/Wiki-wordmark.png)
almost invisible.) From the POV of Fandom, The Thing To Do™ is for someone to step up and "adopt" the wiki - thereby re-acknowledging that we want to continue seeing it hosted by Fandom, and subject to their update policies.
Spoiler: MHO • show

That's a commitment that the entire user population would have to back, which it apparently can't, due to lack of resources. I've decided quite a while ago that if and when Fandom breaks the SSSS wiki beyond repair and it turns out that nobody but myself is willing to "adopt" it, I'll do so by moving it to an entirely different platform, rather than continuing to bother with Fandom's antics. Preferably by merging it with the forum, so as to consolidate both onto the same server(s) and into a single user population, but that is not for me to decide, of course.


Closing note: I know that there's currently a bunch of stuff where user input ought to be fixed; namely, split the Table of contents (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Table_of_Contents) into arcs as announced, edit the latest links on the Table of Special Pages (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Table_of_Special_Pages) to use the ComicPage template (the different font color being the visible consequence), etc.. Those are not Fandom's doing.

(... whereas the now-missing icon after ComicPage links is. That was not yet the case when I made my last post here ...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: wavewright62 on January 03, 2021, 02:17:00 AM
Closing note: I know that there's currently a bunch of stuff where user input ought to be fixed; namely, split the Table of contents (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Table_of_Contents) into arcs as announced, edit the latest links on the Table of Special Pages (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Table_of_Special_Pages) to use the ComicPage template (the different font color being the visible consequence), etc.. Those are not Fandom's doing.

(... whereas the now-missing icon after ComicPage links is. That was not yet the case when I made my last post here ...)
I created the links of Special pages from the end of Adv. 1 forward, and really struggled with trying to figure out how to get the link formatting for Adv. 2 in line with the Adv.1 format (having the default url point to sssscomic2) and just gave up in the end. I couldn't find the ComicPage template.  Getting links on the page was more important to me than having them look consistent. 
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on January 03, 2021, 04:38:32 AM
I created the links of Special pages from the end of Adv. 1 forward, and really struggled with trying to figure out how to get the link formatting for Adv. 2 in line with the Adv.1 format (having the default url point to sssscomic2) and just gave up in the end. I couldn't find the ComicPage template.
... ah, would you look at that. The Special Pages (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:SpecialPages) offered still contain "Uncategorized Templates (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:UncategorizedTemplates)", "Unused Templates (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:UnusedTemplates)", "Wanted Templates (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:WantedTemplates)", and a new "Expand Templates (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:ExpandTemplates)" tool, but not an outright list of templates anymore. Joy. Guess we'll have to make do with Unused Templates and the new "Most Transcluded Pages (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:MostTranscludedPages)" listing ...

Edit to update: The "All Pages (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:AllPages)" special page now has a namespace selector that you can use to list only the templates (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:AllPages?namespace=10).

How to actually work with templates depends on which editor you're using. Personally, I prefer the "Source Editor", where throwing in, say,
Code: [Select]
{{ComicPage|2.345|Best of Sigrun}}should invoke the ComicPage template (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Template:ComicPage) and yield a link to adventure 2's page 345 (https://www.sssscomic.com/comic2.php?page=345) with the text "Best of Sigrun".

Last I checked the "Visual Editor", the user would announce his intent to insert a template (button? typing "{{"? don't remember offhand), would get to select the template (from a list? typing the name in? ...), and then get a popup with as many input fields as the template allows parameters (two for ComicPage, see above for order/purpose).

... and I'll be darned if I have the foggiest why, right now, only the first two invocations of ComicPage on the Table of Special Pages (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Table_of_Special_Pages) display the purple arrow ... >:(

(Looking at the link list at the top of my User Page (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/User:JoB2), it seems that they pulled the list of all templates, the whole of the "Insights" functionality, and certain statistics readouts ...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: wavewright62 on January 04, 2021, 02:20:55 AM
Wa-hey, great stuff.  I was using Source Editor, so never got to see prompts or anything pop up. I am just schooled enough to follow an existing format, and enough to know the (tiny) limits of my knowledge.  I will try some modifications based on your disambiguation strategy when I am next using my laptop and not my phone.
Will that tell me where to upload images and how to properly cite the image's url, or should I continue leaving that alone? (Referencing the Adv. 2 outfits, for instance)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on January 04, 2021, 04:27:57 PM
I was using Source Editor, so never got to see prompts or anything pop up.
Yep, when using the Source Editor, the only place where something's hopefully going to pop up is your imagination. ;) Though IIRC the Source Editor does highlight the syntax it recognizes with different font colors ...

Will that tell me where to upload images and how to properly cite the image's url, or should I continue leaving that alone?
... I have to admit that editing pages complete with adding new images is something that I prefer the Visual Editor for. (Or maybe I should say "preferred", it's been quite a while.) One reason being that the popups are quite helpful for that, because you're actually editing three objects at once (page with text, the file with the actual image, and the description text thereto) while the Source Editor deals with only one at a time; the other being that positioning, resizing etc. an image on a page with text flowing around makes WYSIWYG worthwhile.

Having that said ... I notice that you cannot display an image's "info page" (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/File:InterludeMadsens.jpg) anymore unless you're logged in. Nice jump scare, Fandom ... >:(

(Also, the problem of my(?) browser often only displaying the first two or three images on a page extends beyond the arrows following a link ... WTF?)

Next try: Having that said, the images on the SSSS Wiki tend to not have an actual description (like a Wikipedia image would, a la "photo of Kastrup's waterfront from due East, taken with a TuuriCam 0815 and ASA Harðardóttir film, at 31-Apr-2012 17:43 local time" yadda yadda). They should have a license / copyright note (so as to cover our legal rears), which will automatically add them to the "LicensedMedia" category for technical purposes, and one thematic category (just so that the per-category listings of pages and images are proper; we don't yet have enough pages and images that we're forced to work with sublists, though).

Technically, both license and category go into "the description" (text file), like this (copied straight out of the Source Editor):
Code: [Select]
== Licensing ==
{{Permission}}
[[Category:Characters]]
but the categories are easier to edit with the special clicky-box at the end of the image's info page, rather than starting the full-blown editor.

As you can see, the licenses are, again, ready-to-use templates; "Permission" indicates that we obtained explicit permission from the copyright holder to use the image on the wiki, and covers all of the SSSS comic artwork, as Minna has given us blanket permission in the early days of the wiki. (The templates also contain the magic for the automatic "LicensedMedia" category.)

Every now and then, Fandom updates the cached results for certain "complex" searches, in particular, the list of images that have not been categorized (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:UncategorizedFiles). Another special search lists the images without a license note (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/User:JoB2/FilesWithoutLicenseInfo) - technically, "images that are not in the magic 'LicensedMedia' category".

(If someone were to upload an image and add only a copyright notice, these two lists would still fail to notify me of the missing thematic categorization, but that has not happened so far.)

The single "root" category of the SSSS wiki's tree of categories is "Browse (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:CategoryTree?target=Browse&mode=all&namespaces=)" (original Wikia default), with the "thematic" categories collected under Browse → Content (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:CategoryTree?target=Content&mode=all&namespaces=) → SSSS (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:CategoryTree?target=SSSS&mode=all&namespaces=), and an extra ... → Non-SSSS (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:CategoryTree?target=Non-SSSS&mode=all&namespaces=) for, e.g., ARtD material.

(Yes, the "tree" displays are unwieldy to navigate. Once you have an idea of the hierarchy, it'll be faster to find / select categories from the "flat" list (https://sssscomic.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Categories) ...)
Title: Re: Wiki discussion
Post by: JoB on August 08, 2021, 10:57:14 AM
I recently came across this announcement (https://community.fandom.com/wiki/The_Future_of_Fandom), where Fandom (the provider where our wiki is hosted, originally Wikia) speaks about their motivation for recent changes and the ones they plan to do next. Please note how it's about furthering their brand from top to bottom, while announcements in past years said things like "better accessibility on mobile devices", i.e., some benefit to the individual wikis/fandoms.

It's no secret that I ceased to be happy about Fandom's updating (and how it puts a huge workload on a limited fandom manpower like ours, just to keep fixing the breakage after each) quite a while ago, but with this announcement, I'm getting serious doubts that the permission Minna gave us way-back-when (http://www.sssscomic.com/comic.php?page=176#comment-1574388383) does still cover such a development.

So ... any ideas/suggestions how to proceed from here?