The Stand Still, Stay Silent Fan-Forum

Worlds and Stories => Worlds & Stories Discussion Board => Topic started by: Jitter on August 23, 2021, 12:30:39 PM

Title: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on August 23, 2021, 12:30:39 PM
Here’s the forum’s first Tolkien topic!

It was discovered in a discussion that at least a few of us have been contemplating rereading the Silmarillion but haven’t gotten around to it. In many things, the more the merrier, so why don’t we read together?

RanVor suggested we start in the beginning of September. In addition to that, how should we go? I’m thinking in a sort of book club fashion where we agree dates by which participants will read up till a certain point? I would suggest to not make the schedule too tight to allow busy people to participate. Any thoughts on this?

Also I’d like to hear your thoughts on the book in general - why do you want to read it? Why do you want to reread it? Did you like it the first time around? Etc.

I was very much into the Lord of the Rings as a kid and teenager, when I read it many times. The Silmarillion I read once, and found it terribly tedious.  I’ve been low key planning to take another go probably for 25 years or so, because I suspect I may have been too young and rash to appreciate it at the time. For about two years now it’s been on my reading list, I know many Tolkien fans like it best and I’m curious too see if I can find that magic too. So, making a reading pact will hopefully be what it takes to get started!

Updating reading schedule below on this same page
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on August 23, 2021, 02:42:38 PM
I think this is partially my fault. I hope people aren't too bored.

What I found interesting about the Silmarillion is the parts that aren't there. The fan theories that would make the crazy world-building make sense, the stories glossed over, (most of) the personal detail. For me, it's a bit like reading historical sources and letting your imagination fly. Also I enjoy a good tragedy.

I would also agree that a leisurely schedule would be best. And yes, a book club thing, where on a certain date people are asked to post their reactions.



Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on August 23, 2021, 03:10:20 PM
I think the first week of September is more than enough time to read Ainulindalë (the first part), as it isn't very long. In fact, each of the parts with the exception of Quenta Silmarillion should be easily doable in a week even for busy people, and as for the main part itself, well, we can decide how to divide it up when we get to it. Of course, we can adjust those periods as we get a better idea of everyone's reading speed. Keep in mind that as a fast reader, I may be a bit biased, so if you disagree with my assessment, don't hesitate to intervene.

The Silmarillion is a tough read for sure. In its nature, it's more a collection of fictional myths and legends than a cohesive narrative. The overabundance of difficult names and complicated relations to remember doesn't make it any easier. However, the way it expands the world of LotR, imbuing it with rich history and putting the stories of Bilbo and Frodo in a different, more mystical context makes it worth reading in my opinion.

I sound like I was trying to write some literary treatise here, and I have no idea why.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on August 23, 2021, 03:20:57 PM
Ran, I like your analysis! I hope I’ll be able to appreciate that sort of thing better than when I was 15 :)

And I agree that one-week reading periods would be good. Fast readers can of course go faster, the schedule is just to facilitate discussion. On the other hand if the pause for reading is too long, probably the interested ones will just go on reading and the not-so-interested ones drop it again. I for one am looking for community support to manage this :)

So, discussion about the Ainulindalë starting Monday 6th of September? Everyone happy with that?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on August 23, 2021, 03:23:22 PM
I would want to join a silmarillion rereading event. But I have no useful Idea how to organzie this.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on August 23, 2021, 03:41:24 PM
I would want to join a silmarillion rereading event. But I have no useful Idea how to organzie this.

Don't worry, just reading and participating in the discussion is enough!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on August 23, 2021, 03:45:43 PM
I don’t think we need much organisation, just the dates so that it’s easier to discuss when everyone is on the same page (pun intended).

I suppose we could also agree for someone to “lead” the discussion i.e. open for each week, but I suggest we do that only if it seems that spontaneous discussion doesn’t happen.

And it’s not a closed club, anyone can join at the start or later!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on August 23, 2021, 03:46:28 PM
Ran is absolutely right!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Annuil on August 25, 2021, 08:17:17 AM
*SCREAAAAAAAAM in the manner of a Noldor who saw a Silmarill*
I can talk about this book for ages! I’m so glad you guys started this, I want to read the Silmarillion in English, I’ve only read it in Russian, twice. And I flipped through it a few times so I learned to navigate it. It’s a beautiful book. It had such a great resonance with my heart…. In any case, I’d love to join in!  ;D
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on August 28, 2021, 07:47:57 AM
Uhh, I don't think reading in English should be a prerequisite, should it?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on August 28, 2021, 09:17:11 AM
No, I think any language version is good! May open some avenues for discussion, with potential differences in translation.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 01, 2021, 10:51:33 AM
So, it's September (here in Europe at least) and our quest deep into the history of Arda shall begin!

As discussed, we'll do it in week-long chunks. This is the discussion schedule - you can of course read faster (or slower) but discussion of each section and the work up to that section shall begin on Monday of each week.

Schedule: Read by / discussion starts

Ainulindalë - 6 September
Valaquenta - 13 September

Quenta Silmarillion:
Chapters 1&2 - 20 September
Chapters 3&4 - 27 September
Chapters 5&6 - 4 October
Chapters 7&8 - 11 October
Chapter 9.     - 18 October
Chapters 10, 11, 12 - 25 October
Chapters 13&14 - 1 November
Chapters 15&16 - 8 November
Chapters 17&18 - 15 November
Chapter 19 - 22 November
Chapter 20 - 29 November
Break for holidays preparations
Chapter 21 - 27 December
Chapters 22&23 - 3 January
Chapter 24 - 10 January

Akallabeth - 17 January

Rings of power and the Third Age - 24 January 2022


and so on. We can adjust the length of the reading chunk as we go along, this seems like a very relaxed pace but let's at least start slow.

Any language version is ok. Just remember that others may have a different version, so some names and places may have different names, but I'm sure we can clear any confusion.

This is intended as a bit of book club thingy, so you don't need to only praise the work, all sort of discussion is welcome. You don't even need to like it at all! Although it's probably more fun, if you have some interest at least :)

Anyone can join now or later! You can even participate in the discussion without reading the book at this time, but please don't spoil the future events in the parts that are still upcoming in the reading schedule! Calling @RanVor @tehta @moredhel @Annuil @thegreyarea and others!

If I've forgotten something, please add!





Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Annuil on September 01, 2021, 05:17:55 PM
Yaaaaay! I’ll be silent as a dead balrog! :'D
A little note: if you’re reading the Silmarillion for the first time be prepared to not understand what in the world is going on. One good person told me, “you need to read it 20 times in order to comprehend it.” There’ll be a ton of names and events, so it’s like a history textbook but about the Middle Earth.
Enjoy! And hopefully this will be a great discussion!  ;D :headbang:
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 02, 2021, 01:39:37 AM
Yeah, if you know it by heart, it may still be good to follow the reading timetable to make sure you know what you can discuss and what is in the future for the other readers :)

We are fortunate to have an enthusiast (or several?), I’m sure this will make an interesting discussion!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 02, 2021, 01:32:17 PM
A little note: if you’re reading the Silmarillion for the first time be prepared to not understand what in the world is going on.
But it is still a book you can enjoy without understandig it. And as far as I can say even when rereading it multiple times, I always discover some nice details I did not notice or understand in the previous readings.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 02, 2021, 05:12:34 PM
So, it's September (here in Europe at least) and our quest deep into the history of Arda shall begin!

As discussed, we'll do it in week-long chunks. This is the discussion schedule - you can of course read faster (or slower) but discussion of each section and the work up to that section shall begin on Monday of each week.

Schedule: Read by / discussion starts

Ainulindalë - 6 September
Valaquenta - 13 September

Quenta Silmarillion:
Chapters 1&2 - 20 September
Chapters 3&4 - 27 September

and so on. We can adjust the length of the reading chunk as we go along, this seems like a very relaxed pace but let's at least start slow.
I approve of this schedule, although in the future, I would suggest adjusting the number of chapters per week according to their length. Some of the later chapters get pretty long, while others are only a couple of pages in length.

With the new job, I don't have nearly as much time for reading as I would like, so it's nice to have the discussion in small chunks to avoid feeling pressured, even though I could probably still read a lot faster.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 06, 2021, 12:39:46 PM
Yeah so, any thoughts?

I have a question. I Ilúvatar male or female? I’m reading in Finnish, and we have only one word for both he and she.

I assume it’s male, but I’ve always considered her female. In Finnish the suffix -tar usually means a female form, so for example in Lalli’s moon spell Kuutar means basically Mistress Moon (kuu = moon + tar). So while Ilúvatar is not Finnish, it carries a strong indication of a female person for me.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 06, 2021, 01:19:37 PM
Definitely a 'he' in English. The same goes for all the Ainur we have met so far: Melkor. Manwe, and Ulmo.
(The Silm is, in general, extremely male-centric. Of course, it's supposed to be a book put together by loremasters, so one can always just blame it on them...)

Things I enjoy about this chapter:
-- It is a foretelling of everything that will happen. it also highlights the importance of music in this universe.
-- The whole 'creative struggle' bit at the beginning makes me (as a creator) feel some sympathy for Melkor. Sure, he's a bit of a diva, but he's the only one trying to be Creative on a large scale, and I have to give him props for that. (Also the whole music-battle, with the different pieces described, is a little 'Devil went down to Georgia', but with the person opposing the Devil being all-powerful, which makes much less fair.)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 06, 2021, 01:21:15 PM
In the german translation Ilúvatar is male.

I have some thoughts.
First I want to say, we can see by the way how the world is created Tolkien clearly was a poet. Having some thoughts or ideas, weaving them into a song and this song causes the world. This is in my opinion how a poet or a musician would do it. Songs (or stories) make a world real and alive. A more paintery person would have done it in the other way let ther be light and then add things one after the other.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 06, 2021, 01:35:40 PM
The whole 'creative struggle' bit at the beginning makes me (as a creator) feel some sympathy for Melkor. Sure, he's a bit of a diva, but he's the only one trying to be Creative on a large scale, and I have to give him props for that.

I feel completely the same about Melkor. He wants to create his own original creations I can feek this. And he does not only destroy he does add new things to the world like the snowflakes. And as his Brothers and Sisters Melkor is a Part of Ilúvatars thoughts. At least from my point of view this is an accurate psychological description. The part of my mind that makes me to try to improve and acquire new skill is the same part that wants to burn all of my works because they are not good enough.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 06, 2021, 03:20:20 PM
Ilúvatar specifically says to Melkor that he cannot add anything into the music that wasn’t originated in Ilúvatar. So, does this mean that greed, covetousness and hate always have to be part of the World? This is a thought presented in many works. There cannot be light without shadow. Or maybe there cannot be creativity without someone who’s refusing to conform?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 06, 2021, 03:50:52 PM
Doesn't he even say that Melkor's whole 'rebellion' is part of his design?

Quote
And thou, Melkor, shalt see that no theme may be played that hath not it's uttermost source in me, nor can any alter the music in my despite. For he that attempteth this shall prove but mine instrument in the devising of things more wonderful. which he himself hath not imagined.’

So, yes, some of the most wonderful parts of the design could not be created without the discord of Melkor, and, yes, even that discord has it's source in Iluvatar.

Still finding Iluvatar a bit pompous and annoying... this will be a recurring theme for me. I always like the middle-managers of the Elves better than their leaders. Ulmo is pretty cool, though.

BTW, check out that bit at the end, about gender identity among the Ainur:

Quote
...for that difference of temper they had even from their beginning, and it is but bodied forth in the choice of each, not made by the choice, even as with us male and female may be shown by the raiment but is not made thereby.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 06, 2021, 03:56:14 PM
I would say that without a feeling the existing things are not good enough there never would be a new creation. Without the Melkor thought within Ilúvatar would there have been a world at all? Without the wish to create something original?
If any world would have existed it would have been a static one because everyone would have been in harmony with everything else. There would never have been any need to change anything.

As longer I think about it more and more things would be impossible without anything destructive in the world. No progress, nothing new, can strong emotions be possible in this 'perfect' world? Every strong emotion has destructive elements.

To break it down to a more practical level kids draw stick figures. If the kids would just be happy with stick figures, nothing else would be drawn ever. Every painting technique and theory was invented because stick figures are not good enough.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 06, 2021, 04:02:34 PM
I totally agree with all you are saying, fellow-forum-member-with-Tolkien-related-nickname.  And we'll see a similar theme again and again, where a somewhat corrupt creative urge brings darkness (and beauty) to the world.
Spoiler: show
Exhibit A: Feanor. Exhibit B: his grandson.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 06, 2021, 05:56:42 PM
Everything must end, for without endings there would be no beginnings (I’m sure this is a direct quote but don’t know where from).

Tehta, I meant exactly the bit in your first quote, although as I have the translation I didn’t know how exactly to put it.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Róisín on September 06, 2021, 08:01:32 PM
Moredhel, I find it interesting that Tolkien based his Elvish languages in Finnish and Welsh.

 And the creation story has elements of our Celtic Pagan one, in which God sings the first word, which becomes the three rays of light from which the universe is created. Which is why the Druidic symbol is those three lines radiating from a single point, symbolising creation.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 07, 2021, 04:30:55 AM
Starting with the first word feels like a quite natural singers/poets creation. But Tolkien startet with a complete complex song with 3 quite different movements. Maybe the difference between the two methods is that in Tolkiens way to do it the whole history of the world is already determined.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 07, 2021, 10:09:09 AM
Starting with the first word feels like a quite natural singers/poets creation. But Tolkien startet with a complete complex song with 3 quite different movements. Maybe the difference between the two methods is that in Tolkiens way to do it the whole history of the world is already determined.

Doesn't he even say that Melkor's whole 'rebellion' is part of his design?

So, yes, some of the most wonderful parts of the design could not be created without the discord of Melkor, and, yes, even that discord has it's source in Iluvatar.

I feel the ending could well be interpreted to mean that Melkor's actions in trying to destroy everything the valar created may have an effect on this. That his destruction added an element of the unexpected, again appearing as destruction that also creates? So that while the World came into being based on the Song, the cycle of creation and destruction perhaps changed it so that it doesn't have to follow the Song exactly?

On the other hand it also says that the vision of the World dimmed before the end and this is why valar don't know the end of times, implying that until the moment where the vision was extinguished, they do know what will be.

(I'm already thinking I may have to get the original English version too, it's hard to discuss specific passages with only the translation)

Still finding Iluvatar a bit pompous and annoying... this will be a recurring theme for me. I always like the middle-managers of the Elves better than their leaders. Ulmo is pretty cool, though.

Oh yes! Trololoo, I'm just letting you "rebel" :D

BTW, check out that bit at the end, about gender identity among the Ainur:

Yeah I noticed that and it rubs me the wrong way a bit. Ok written SO LONG ago (I mean by JRR, not the Second Age or whatever, but still) and therefore understandable but why would a non-corporeal Power need a gender?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 07, 2021, 10:44:14 AM
I feel the ending could well be interpreted to mean that Melkor's actions in trying to destroy everything the valar created may have an effect on this. That his destruction added an element of the unexpected, again appearing as destruction that also creates? So that while the World came into being based on the Song, the cycle of creation and destruction perhaps changed it so that it doesn't have to follow the Song exactly?
This is an idea I like. Because it would open a way for the humans to find their own path between creation and destruction. Basically creating their own song.
Yeah I noticed that and it rubs me the wrong way a bit. Ok written SO LONG ago (I mean by JRR, not the Second Age or whatever, but still) and therefore understandable but why would a non-corporeal Power need a gender?
That ist a point that puzzles me. But I am a weirdo I don't understand the relevance of gender differences for real people so I thought I was the only one puzzled by this.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 07, 2021, 11:22:46 AM
I guess many people (including both Tolkien, and the hypothetical loremasters who wrote the Silm in theory) are uncomfortable with beings of unclear gender. (I don't get it either, of course.)  I think I will end up pointing out other strange (to me) takes on gender throughout. I do think it's interesting that he definitely sees it as a function of the soul, not the flesh, though.

The humans are definitely getting their own path beyond Arda, one that is not foretold in the Music, at least after death. I think the 'Of Men' chapter states this explicitly.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 08, 2021, 10:04:49 AM
Yeah so, any thoughts?

I have a question. I Ilúvatar male or female? I’m reading in Finnish, and we have only one word for both he and she.

I assume it’s male, but I’ve always considered her female. In Finnish the suffix -tar usually means a female form, so for example in Lalli’s moon spell Kuutar means basically Mistress Moon (kuu = moon + tar). So while Ilúvatar is not Finnish, it carries a strong indication of a female person for me.
Definitely male in the Polish translation.

The whole 'creative struggle' bit at the beginning makes me (as a creator) feel some sympathy for Melkor. Sure, he's a bit of a diva, but he's the only one trying to be Creative on a large scale, and I have to give him props for that. (Also the whole music-battle, with the different pieces described, is a little 'Devil went down to Georgia', but with the person opposing the Devil being all-powerful, which makes much less fair.)
I feel completely the same about Melkor. He wants to create his own original creations I can feek this. And he does not only destroy he does add new things to the world like the snowflakes. And as his Brothers and Sisters Melkor is a Part of Ilúvatars thoughts. At least from my point of view this is an accurate psychological description. The part of my mind that makes me to try to improve and acquire new skill is the same part that wants to burn all of my works because they are not good enough.
I never thought about it this way, but yeah, and once we get into Quenta Silmarillion, you'll see just how much Melkor got screwed over in the grand scheme of things.

Doesn't he even say that Melkor's whole 'rebellion' is part of his design?
Oh yes! Trololoo, I'm just letting you "rebel" :D
That part is irritating. Ilúvatar is practically challenging Melkor to rebel and even rubs the futility of it in his face.

Spoiler: show
It reminds me of a certain character from another story, and not in a good way.


BTW, check out that bit at the end, about gender identity among the Ainur:
Yeah I noticed that and it rubs me the wrong way a bit. Ok written SO LONG ago (I mean by JRR, not the Second Age or whatever, but still) and therefore understandable but why would a non-corporeal Power need a gender?
That ist a point that puzzles me. But I am a weirdo I don't understand the relevance of gender differences for real people so I thought I was the only one puzzled by this.
I guess many people (including both Tolkien, and the hypothetical loremasters who wrote the Silm in theory) are uncomfortable with beings of unclear gender. (I don't get it either, of course.)  I think I will end up pointing out other strange (to me) takes on gender throughout. I do think it's interesting that he definitely sees it as a function of the soul, not the flesh, though.
It is certainly strange. Then again, it was written a century ago.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 08, 2021, 01:43:27 PM
That part is irritating. Ilúvatar is practically challenging Melkor to rebel and even rubs the futility of it in his face.

As an interaction between independent individuals this is completely strange. But Melkor is one of Ilúvatars thoughts and part of his personality. And from this perspective it is at least for me not strange. I do not know how common this is, but it is very much how my mind works.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 08, 2021, 03:45:47 PM
As an interaction between independent individuals this is completely strange. But Melkor is one of Ilúvatars thoughts and part of his personality. And from this perspective it is at least for me not strange. I do not know how common this is, but it is very much how my mind works.

This suddenly makes me note something. It’s not a very uncommon theme that there is a fallen one, one among several beings, where the others are good and this one black sheep is the source of evil in the world / realm / etc.

This is a surprising as in the same tales the evil side tends to be approximately evenly matched with the good, or, quite often, clearly stronger. Also there seems to be many ingenious ways of being evil, while the good guys often are fairly similar to each other. So, is the fallen one MUCH more influential than the others? Is evil a contagious disease with higher infectiousness than good? Is there any hope for any of the worlds in the long run? Is Jitter making any sense?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Annuil on September 08, 2021, 09:39:28 PM
I’m late to the party! Man!..

In Russian translation Iluvatar is also male. And speaking of gender, I think the scene where Ainur take the visible form is like the moment of their birth as Valar, since they need to remain in the world, and we are all born with a gender (unless you are a fish or a snake… which Valar are not animals), which we did not choose, I was chosen before us and for us. So, I see no problem there.

That’s a very interesting question, Jitter, I was actually thinking that it’s not that uncommon. In the Bible Satan is exactly the fallen one, who dragged a few other (i think they were angels) beings to the dark side, and keeps creating problems in the world. This part is actually very similar to the story of the Bible, which a lot of the Silmarillion is, sometimes it amazes me. It’s covered up by all the events so well that it’s often hard to see the parallel, but when you do, it seems really grand.

By the way, Melkor often reminds of that sibling who is always jealous about what other siblings have or do, so he comes and breaks their toys  :'D
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 08, 2021, 10:23:23 PM
That’s a very interesting question, Jitter, I was actually thinking that it’s not that uncommon. In the Bible Satan is exactly the fallen one, who dragged a few other (i think they were angels) beings to the dark side, and keeps creating problems in the world. This part is actually very similar to the story of the Bible, which a lot of the Silmarillion is, sometimes it amazes me. It’s covered up by all the events so well that it’s often hard to see the parallel, but when you do, it seems really grand.
And here I thought this was really obvious...
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Annuil on September 08, 2021, 11:03:20 PM
And here I thought this was really obvious...
This scene is obvious, you're right. I was talking about some other things, further into the story. Some of them are covered really well.

I totally forgot to mention, about Jitter's thought, that there were a few other stories with the similar plot of one being fallen, others around going against them, but now i cannot remember anything in particular. Maybe I am mistaking.
As far as i remember Norse myths do not have that structure, neither do Greek myths, though those have some characters that are like outcasts. 
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 09, 2021, 03:56:35 AM
Ran, yes you were being obvious :)

Annuil, I think the Norse myth kind of does include the same - Loki is Odin's brother, and while he isn't the Great Big Evil all the time, he is the one that will set Ragnarök in motion. So while he does not live in exile ever since The Beginning (he does at times but also returns to Asgård and lives with the Asas from time to time), he has some of the characteristics of the Fallen One.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 09, 2021, 05:02:07 AM
This is a surprising as in the same tales the evil side tends to be approximately evenly matched with the good, or, quite often, clearly stronger.
If good and evil are near to evenly matched there is the potential for a good ans complex story. If one side is much more powerful it will be a quick win and end of the story.
Also there seems to be many ingenious ways of being evil, while the good guys often are fairly similar to each other. So, is the fallen one MUCH more influential than the others? Is evil a contagious disease with higher infectiousness than good? Is there any hope for any of the worlds in the long run? Is Jitter making any sense?
The good guys are in my opinion incorporation the rules and principles of the world. So they have to be similar. All the contradicting principles are incorporated by the fallen one. Wich in my opinion is a good metaphor for living in a society. There is a set of rules and as long as you follow them you are one of the good guys. But it seems impossible for Humans to live by just following the rules they tend to break them at least from time to time, sometimes even for good reasons. I think this is why so many people are telling this sort of storys because too much rulebreaking lets a society collapse and there is no good way to eliminate it at all.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 09, 2021, 09:35:15 AM
If good and evil are near to evenly matched there is the potential for a good ans complex story. If one side is much more powerful it will be a quick win and end of the story.
Or a lot of convoluted Deus Ex Machina plot nonsense.

The good guys are in my opinion incorporation the rules and principles of the world. So they have to be similar. All the contradicting principles are incorporated by the fallen one. Wich in my opinion is a good metaphor for living in a society. There is a set of rules and as long as you follow them you are one of the good guys. But it seems impossible for Humans to live by just following the rules they tend to break them at least from time to time, sometimes even for good reasons. I think this is why so many people are telling this sort of storys because too much rulebreaking lets a society collapse and there is no good way to eliminate it at all.
Spoken like a true Lawful Good character. ;)

As an interaction between independent individuals this is completely strange. But Melkor is one of Ilúvatars thoughts and part of his personality. And from this perspective it is at least for me not strange. I do not know how common this is, but it is very much how my mind works.
I never said that it doesn't make sense, only that it's irritating. While it's true that Melkor is ultimately an aspect of Eru and as such, it's impossible for him to truly outplay his creator, Ilúvatar taunting him about it makes the benevolent creator of the world look like a jerk.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 09, 2021, 10:40:47 AM
If good and evil are near to evenly matched there is the potential for a good ans complex story. If one side is much more powerful it will be a quick win and end of the story.

I understand the point of it for the story :) But if you want to make two approximately even sides, why does evil start smaller but grow faster?


But it seems impossible for Humans to live by just following the rules they tend to break them at least from time to time, sometimes even for good reasons. I think this is why so many people are telling this sort of storys because too much rulebreaking lets a society collapse and there is no good way to eliminate it at all.

You are right of course, all societies have (and, as previously discussed in relation to creativity) perhaps have to have some rule-breaking, but it also has to be controlled.

I never said that it doesn't make sense, only that it's irritating. While it's true that Melkor is ultimately an aspect of Eru and as such, it's impossible for him to truly outplay his creator, Ilúvatar taunting him about it makes the benevolent creator of the world look like a jerk.

^ This exact thing right here! ^
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 09, 2021, 11:14:55 AM
Spoken like a true Lawful Good character. ;)
Let's say halfway lawful. A truly lawful one would not say that humans can not live without breaking the law from time to time. And good? It is possible to make really evil laws and the statement would still be true.
I never said that it doesn't make sense, only that it's irritating. While it's true that Melkor is ultimately an aspect of Eru and as such, it's impossible for him to truly outplay his creator, Ilúvatar taunting him about it makes the benevolent creator of the world look like a jerk.
Makes him somehow realistic for me. He knows he has a chaotic (self)destructive side and he has to deal with it somehow. Methods to do so may vary I am not a psychologist.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 09, 2021, 12:24:54 PM
Let's say halfway lawful. A truly lawful one would not say that humans can not live without breaking the law from time to time. And good? It is possible to make really evil laws and the statement would still be true.
No, that's just common sense.

Spoiler: lengthy off-topic rant about lawful archetypes • show
In my interpretation, the defining trait of the Lawful Good archetype is the belief that rules and regulations are necessary for society to properly function. While the individual laws can be good, bad or anywhere in between, the existence of a system regulating social behavior is imperative in itself - without it, everything would fall apart. This is in contrast to the Lawful Neutral archetype, which sees law as a value in itself, as opposed to a means to maintain and stabilize society, and the Lawful Evil archetype, for which laws exist to be exploited to one's own advantage. This is hardly the place to discuss it, though.


Makes him somehow realistic for me. He knows he has a chaotic (self)destructive side and he has to deal with it somehow. Methods to do so may vary I am not a psychologist.
I don't think provoking your destructive side to rebel against you is a good way of handling it in any circumstance, but to each their own, I guess.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 09, 2021, 03:13:55 PM
I don't think provoking your destructive side to rebel against you is a good way of handling it in any circumstance, but to each their own, I guess.
How else would you get it to work?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 12, 2021, 09:09:33 AM
So, tomorrow, Valaquenta!

I don’t think the discussion needs to close on the earlier sections but can go forward. This will likely be useful when we ar on the longer archs in Quenta Silmarillion.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 13, 2021, 02:15:17 AM
It's time.

To be completely honest, there isn't much to discuss in Valaquenta. It's just an explanation of who is who amongst the Valar and the introduction of the Maiar. It goes a bit more in-depth about each Vala's sphere of influence and contains first mentions of Olórin and Sauron (whose original name was Mairon, by the way, a bit of trivia not mentioned in Valaquenta itself), but that's about it.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 13, 2021, 06:28:09 AM
Yes, it's your basic mythology guide.

I suppose one could discuss whether any major mythological roles/portfolios are not covered? (Um, god of art or music? Unless one thinks that the water/music connection puts music in Ulmo's portfolio? God of alcohol (humans seem to enjoy having those)?)

Here are a few things I find interesting:

* Right. The connection between water and music. I think that comes up a few times in other places.

* Some of the Valar are siblings. How?

* We learn Melian's and Gandalf's educational backgrounds! (He was a Maia associated with Lorien and Nienna -- not sure I would have guessed those two off-hand! He seems too proactive. But I guess his ability to spread hope clearly comes from those two.)

* The fact that Melkor was kind of a parodist: "Melkor spent his spirit in envy and hate, until at last he could make nothing save in mockery of the thought of others..." This is something parody fanfic writers must beware of! By which I mean me. (But I suppose loving mockery, which I aim for, is a different matter.)

* Tulkas... Oh, Tulkas: "He has little heed for either the past or the future, and is of no avail as a counsellor, but is a hardy friend." He sounds like he'd enjoy a drink.

Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 13, 2021, 01:59:56 PM
Yeah, given the importance of music and poetry in Tolkien’s world, starting with the very music of creation, it is a surprise there is no god of music. Also no one for childbirth or harvest although Yavanna probably governs the latter. And who keeps the terrestrial animals? Fish and aquatic animals are Ulmo’s, birds are Manwë’s but who takes care of mammals?

I also wondered about the siblings and the fact that most of the Valar are married or “together with” another but none have children. This is very different from, say, the Norse or Greek pantheons :) Zeus and Odin have offspring all over the place, both in their godly domains and among (and born of) humans. We do however know that it is possible for at least some ainur to procreate (more on that later). But, what makes some of them siblings? And Vána is even the younger sister of Yavanna.

Furthermore I strongly appreciate the fact that two of them remain unmarried, there is even a goddess who doesn’t have a spouse while most others do! Unexpected but great.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 13, 2021, 02:16:30 PM
I have been thinking Yavanna for harvest and for childbirth too ('giver of fruits'). And maybe Orome for at least some animals?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 13, 2021, 02:50:05 PM
Yes, Orome (don’t have the dots for an e now) for hounds etc but not all animals. Who protects the squirrels??
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: thegreyarea on September 13, 2021, 03:41:48 PM
Sorry! I'm late! But if you don't mind I'd love to join this amazing trip on Tolkien's fantastic creation! I love the Silmarillion, and already read it twice (in Portuguese, BTW), and will always be willing to take another turn on that carousel. :)

I'm also sorry for not being around on the first part, that instantly made me fall in love with the book. The music of creation... Ah! I've read many creation myths, but this is probably the most beautiful one.

I'm not at home today, or tomorrow, and I don't want to comment using just my memory, so I'll have to wait until thursday to reread that chapter and be able to say more.

Hugs!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 13, 2021, 04:41:21 PM
* Some of the Valar are siblings. How?
Because. Technically they should all be brothers and sisters, being all born from Ilúvatar's thoughts. Maybe Eru imagined them as such?

Spoiler: show
It occurred to me today that Curunír (a.k.a. Saruman) was one of Aulë's Maiar as well. Aulë seems to have something of a problem with his servants turning to the dark side.


I'm not at home today, or tomorrow, and I don't want to comment using just my memory, so I'll have to wait until thursday to reread that chapter and be able to say more.

Hugs!
It's alright, we'll be waiting for you!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 13, 2021, 05:21:54 PM
Yeah, given the importance of music and poetry in Tolkien’s world, starting with the very music of creation, it is a surprise there is no god of music.

In my opinion it is logical not to have a god for music. They are responsible for arts of the world. But music was there before the world and created the world. So I think for the gods inside the world it is impossible to be mthe god of music. The gods in the world have some sort of control over the thing they are responsible for. The only gods ever showing some sort of control over music where Ilúvatar and Melkor.

One interesting thing we learn is that at least Maiar can change their minds e. g. about Melkor. That means we know that Time is relevant for them too.

Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 20, 2021, 03:09:24 PM
Hey! You guys keeping up? Chapters 1 and 2!

Are you happy with the pace by the way?

So anyways, we were just talking about there not being a god of poetry, but apparently Manwë is that. Or at least he gave poetry and song to the vanyar.

What do you think about the dwarves? Where will they go at their death?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 20, 2021, 03:18:50 PM
Aulë creates the dwarves, Ilúvatar: Eh, that's fine.
Melkor tries to create anything, Ilúvatar: HOW DARE YOU

Dwarves probably go back into the earth they were made of.
Spoiler: show
Or to Valinor with their elf best buddies...


My favorite part of those two chapters were the lamps. Something that existed and passed away before any mortal being could witness it, feels very mythical.

Aren't elves introduced in chapter 3? (EDIT: Nevermind, double-checked and it's there in chapter 1.)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 20, 2021, 03:32:41 PM
Eep! i read only Chapter One, which I find a bit boring (and I guess that is why I forgot the Manwë-poetry connection).

I do enjoy Chapter Two, though, what with the marital squabbling (flirting?) between Yavanna and Aulë, and the "nonetheless they will have need of wood'.
I am a bit confused by the seven FATHERS of the Dwarves, however.
Spoiler: show
(And I am not sure how people feel about self-recs here, but I once tried to resolve (https://archiveofourown.org/works/2038485) this particular problem with a triple-drabble.)


Also, to add to RanVor's collection:

Yavanna: By the way, remember that time I sang that I wanted trees to have souls, and you didn't say no?
Ilúvatar: Yes, yes, I totally remember, no problem.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 20, 2021, 03:48:00 PM
I am a bit confused by the seven FATHERS of the Dwarves, however.
Spoiler: show
(And I am not sure how people feel about self-recs here, but I once tried to resolve (https://archiveofourown.org/works/2038485) this particular problem with a triple-drabble.)

This is hilarious. Thank you.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 20, 2021, 03:56:06 PM
Aulë creates the dwarves, Ilúvatar: Eh, that's fine.

We are againt at the point of Aule and his scolars have a tendency to turn to the dark side. But I think this is natural for the god of crafts and technology. Inventions often try to replace and invalidate the old ways. And of course the wish to create something greater than everything made before.

And we are at one of the points where the world is completely changed. And it is done by an unique act of creation.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 21, 2021, 02:31:49 PM
If we go with the “dwarven females are indistinguishable from males” theory, the seven “Fathers” could have any combination of types of genitalia (as long as it’s a combination).

I happen to strongly support this theory! I especially enjoy it in Discworld.

Also I liked your story, tehta :)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 21, 2021, 02:39:22 PM

My favorite part of those two chapters were the lamps. Something that existed and passed away before any mortal being could witness it, feels very mythical.

I have the book A Tolkien Bestiary by David Day, and have had it for decades. It has a number of full color illustrations (remember, decades means long predates internet with graphics), one of which is of the destruction of the Lamps. It’s very impressive but also sad, and maybe the reason why I have had the image in my head that the Age of the Lamps was kind of meh. But now the description of the Spring of Arda makes them seem much nicer :)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 22, 2021, 05:29:30 AM
Also, regarding the fate of the Dwarves: I suppose you were asking which of the three legends we find most plausible?

Quote
Aforetime it was held among the Elves in Middle-earth that dying the Dwarves returned to the earth and the stone of which they were made; yet that is not their own belief. For they say that Aule the Maker, whom they call Mahal, cares for them, and gathers them to Mandos in halls set apart; and that he declared to their Fathers of old that Iluvatar will hallow them and give them a place among the Children in the End. Then their part shall be to serve Aule and to aid him in the remaking of Arda after the Last Battle. They say also that the Seven Fathers of the Dwarves return to live again in their own kin and to bear once more their ancient names: of whom Durin was the most renowned in after ages, father of that kindred most friendly to the Elves, whose mansions were at Khazad-dum.

I think the Elves are just being snobby about other races as usual. I don't buy it.
The legend of the Dwarves, about a special section of the Halls of Mandos, seems plausible.
But the reincarnation theory is the most fun.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 26, 2021, 03:55:45 PM
From tomorrow, chapters 3 and 4.

I have an emergency at work so I'm not sure I can join on Monday but I will during the week!

Do you still like the pace? 5 + 6 have about the same page count, as do 7+8, but then 9 would be on its own. Does this work?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 26, 2021, 04:10:34 PM
From tomorrow, chapters 3 and 4.
The elves journey to Valinor!

Do you still like the pace? 5 + 6 have about the same page count, as do 7+8, but then 9 would be on its own. Does this work?
It's fine for me.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on September 28, 2021, 04:16:45 PM
I was waiting for someone else to start, because I don't feel like I have that much to say.

I find the story of the journey to Valinor a bit tedious, with all the splits between the different groups of Elves and their assorted names. It feels like an exam is coming at the end. Also, I feel more sympathetic than I perhaps should towards all the more chaotic subgroups of Elves who kept pausing whenever they saw something pretty, or wandering off, and forming subgroups which were later given less flattering names.

BTW, I used to wonder why Ingwë, Finwë and Elwë were chosen as the ambassadors, and how they relate to the original Elves who awoke (who were already divided into the three kindred we see later, and had a different, named, set of leaders). Well, the new Tolkien book (Nature of Middle-earth) says they were all 6th generation Elves, descended from the original leaders, and chosen for their personalities.

I really do like the part about Varda kindling the stars, both because it is very nice imagery, and because I like how Mandos says "we can't give the Elves any proper light sources, only the stars" and she reacts with "well, if they're to have only stars, I will make sure those stars are awesome".

I also like Melkor's propaganda campaign against Orome. Very clever.

The thing about how the Orcs are descendants of corrupted Elves is horrifying, but also spiritually confusing, and contradicted in other sources. See, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orc#In-fiction_origins
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on September 28, 2021, 05:32:10 PM
Also, I feel more sympathetic than I perhaps should towards all the more chaotic subgroups of Elves who kept pausing whenever they saw something pretty, or wandering off, and forming subgroups which were later given less flattering names.
I feel sympathy for them too. Pretty things here compared to some sort of better place far away, I think I would have stayed for a while. Evene if the things in Valinor are better the pretty things right now are still pretty. And elves do not run out of time they can just go later.

This is something I was thinking a lot about. Do elves have a different concept of later? Because if a human says I will do it later you would expect something  like later the same day or in the next few days. But if two elves talk both of them thousands of years old, if one of them says later could it mean something like next century?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on September 29, 2021, 02:43:36 AM
That feeling when you're so in love you spend literal years just staring into the other person's eyes without eating, sleeping, etc. (No, I don't know that feeling, why do you ask?)

This is something I was thinking a lot about. Do elves have a different concept of later? Because if a human says I will do it later you would expect something  like later the same day or in the next few days. But if two elves talk both of them thousands of years old, if one of them says later could it mean something like next century?
That would make sense. Life is probably a lot less hectic for an elf than for a human.

Still not as bad as the ents, though.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on September 30, 2021, 02:35:51 PM
I have also thought many times that a character with a lifespan of thousands of years would be very hard to even imagine, let alone write in a convincing way. Would they mature further and further like many (nit all…) humans do with age? Is there a limit where they wouldn’t get any more mature? Do they start forgetting things when millenia of new things are collected every day? Would they live in strictly in the moment, or have a very long and patient view, or alternate between the two states? Or something else that we can’t even grasp? Maybe a very young elf could be able to communicate with humans, but wouldn’t a being with three thousand years of wisdom and nobleness be so alien to the human mind that real communication would be impossible? I’m not making statements, mind you, but wondering.

On a more practical level. Yavanna went to Middle Earth and put things to sleep to spare them from the darkness. What did the elves eat?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 01, 2021, 04:16:46 PM
BTW I updated the schedule on p 1 of this thread with 5+6, 7+8 and 9 for the upcoming weeks.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 04, 2021, 02:38:50 PM
Is anyone still reading?

Enter Fëanor, and many things with him. I find the eldar have too many children! If they don’t die, and everyone has three, four or seven children, there’s going to be elves everywhere! Perhaps it’s only their high and mighty who do this, but still.

Also women exist to be wives again. Shees. I know, written ages ago, but it still bothers me.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on October 04, 2021, 03:15:01 PM
I'm happy to keep reading, but don't want to take over the discussion with my silly comments. (Such as that the story of the Elves heading to Valinor reminds me of college and trying to herd a friend group to a party, with people getting distracted, deciding to wait for their friends, then getting upset that they missed the bus, etc. The imagery of the floating island is nice though.)

But you are right, most Elves had far fewer children than those whacky Finwians. (I seem to remember that Feanor and Nerdanel's seven were unique.) I think part of that is that the parents' (and especially the mothers') strength and spirit went into each child, as we just saw with Miriel.

Another point that is not made exactly clear here is that Elves are supposed to have just one spouse (since they might meet again if reincarnated.) Finwe was given a special dispensation because Miriel promised never to be reborn.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on October 04, 2021, 03:44:20 PM
Is anyone still reading?
Yes but I am some chapters ahead. Makes it hard to discuss without spoilers.
Enter Fëanor, and many things with him. I find the eldar have too many children! If they don’t die, and everyone has three, four or seven children, there’s going to be elves everywhere! Perhaps it’s only their high and mighty who do this, but still.
Even if it is just one kid per couple every 1000 years exponential growth would kick in.
Also women exist to be wives again. Shees. I know, written ages ago, but it still bothers me.
Me too this it shows a mindset that in my opinon caused many bad things to individuals and society in general.

Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 04, 2021, 04:07:42 PM
Yes but I am some chapters ahead. Makes it hard to discuss without spoilers.


Maybe look back to where the schedule is, to remind yourself what to say and what not to?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on October 07, 2021, 04:19:18 PM
I look forward to discussing Fëanor after his story is concluded. He's one of the most interesting characters ever written by Tolkien.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Annuil on October 10, 2021, 01:32:12 PM
Yayayay I promised myself I will come here when the name of Fëanor is mentioned! :'D
One of my favorite characters of Tolkien, not that I like him, I admire him as a literary character, because he is the best plot-driver one can possibly find/come up with :'D
In any case, sorry for not being very active, I have way too much stuff to deal with right now.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 11, 2021, 11:31:18 AM
The current chapter Of the Silmarils and the Unrest of Noldor is rather topical, I’m afraid. A shadow presence is circulating rumors about how some people are not quite getting all they really deserve, and the people go for it and choose to believe the lies.

Hmmm, almost as if I’d heard something similar elsewhere.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on October 11, 2021, 06:33:17 PM
If a lie is repeated over and over again more and more people will believe it.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Róisín on October 12, 2021, 06:11:04 AM
Yeah, the all too popular political strategy of The Big Lie. Works far too often in our world.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 12, 2021, 08:25:42 AM
Sadly, it seems to work the better, when it’s pulling the strings of what is the worst in us :(
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on October 12, 2021, 05:18:01 PM
That's because humans are easily controlled by their fears. Playing on those fears is therefore the easiest form of manipulation.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: LuckyCheshire on October 12, 2021, 10:02:30 PM
Ooh, interesting thread! I may need to catch up with the reading before making any contributions, I read The Silmarillion once but it's been a while :)  I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, so I have to throw in a reccomendation of 'Nightfall in Middle-Earth' by Blind Guardian to anyone who likes rock or metal. What more could you ask for than an entire album based on The Silmarillion? Sorry if I'm interrupting, I'll come back more on topic after I've read back through up to this point  :3
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on October 13, 2021, 03:56:57 AM
I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, so I have to throw in a reccomendation of 'Nightfall in Middle-Earth' by Blind Guardian to anyone who likes rock or metal. What more could you ask for than an entire album based on The Silmarillion? :3
It's pretty great. One of their best albums, if not the best. I've been listening to it more lately.

There haven't been any songs relevant to the current chapters yet, but for next week, it would be Into the Storm and Nightfall, and maybe The Curse of Feanor. If it matters to somebody, that is.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 13, 2021, 06:02:34 AM
Ooh, interesting thread! I may need to catch up with the reading before making any contributions, I read The Silmarillion once but it's been a while :)  I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, so I have to throw in a reccomendation of 'Nightfall in Middle-Earth' by Blind Guardian to anyone who likes rock or metal. What more could you ask for than an entire album based on The Silmarillion? Sorry if I'm interrupting, I'll come back more on topic after I've read back through up to this point  :3

You are not interrupting, LuckyCheshire! The music recommendation is 100% on topic.

As for the reading schedule, the idea is to limit spoilers for people who haven’t read it at all (o have forgotten most of it). I think everyone who is participating in the discussion at the moment has already read it, but as only a small proportion of forum members comment on anything, it is possible that there are others reading with us, even if they are not saying anything. So, I think we should stick to the “bookclub rules” we set up in the beginning.

Nevertheless I’m wondering whether the pace is a bit slow? How about we up the page count a bit? It depends also on the chapter lengths of course, but so far I tried to make it around 20 pages per week only.  This is a question for anyone, not Cheshire in particular :)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Annuil on October 17, 2021, 09:35:17 PM
Yaaay! “Nightfall in Middle Earth” is one of my favourite albums ever!  :headbang:
Yes, great music suggestion, very atmospheric, may be a little too “mentally” for some, but to my tastes it’s the most best!  :sigrun:
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 18, 2021, 02:17:02 PM
Oh Noldor! I remember when I read this the first time, as more or less a kid, and to begin with I was oh yea, elves! And at Chapter 9, if not earlier, “WTF elves! Nooooo!” 😳😨😱 This is a horrible chapter.

And Fëanor and his house are horrible elves! Yes, I understand they were led astray by Melkor, but still! I hate him just as much as I did then, although now I perhaps feel more sorry for him too.

Practical question. In the beginning of the chapter it says something like (remember I have a translation) “and the valar were sitting in shadow, for it was night”, which is of course the case with the Trees just destroyed. But, when the noldor attack the teleri at the harbor to get the ships, it says ”swords were drawn at dawn”. What dawn? Everything was in darkness at this time, no?

For the same reason, how come they could see the dangerous ice in the Helcaraxë? It specifically says that the cold fog was not penetrated by stars. Elven eyes or not, how far can they possibly see in those conditions?

Also I had completely forgotten that Fëanor had the ships torched when Fingolfin’s people were still in the West. He’s even worse than I remembered.

Incidentally, this sort of thing seems very appropriate for a television series produced now. It seems to me all television is very bleak nowadays, and this will be brilliant source material for a series that makes sure the viewer doesn’t become joyful or feel-good!

I knew this was here and still I’m a bit upset. Noldor Y U do this?

Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on October 18, 2021, 03:37:14 PM
I wonder every time why the Noldor do this horrible things. People doing evil things for no reason is uncomfortably realistic. And we have an interesting insight in the I would call it Metaphysics of evil in this part of the Silmarillion. We have here a setting where becoming evil does not make you an servant of the dark lord. We do have here two types of evil heavily fighting each other.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on October 18, 2021, 04:51:18 PM
I too have many feelings about the Noldor, and especially the Feanorians. Note also Fëanor's weird colonialist little jab at the Teleri, "you would be living in shacks" and all that. Would that even be bad? i have long believed that the reason the Teleri used the jewels the Noldor gave them to decorate the beaches is that they had no other use for such items. If you dump them on a beach at least you don't have to dust them.

Oh, and oath! It's not 'we swear to recover our works' it's 'we swear to punish anyone who so much as touches our stuff'.

I can write more about this if desired.

But I don't see any mention of dawn in the description of the Kinslaying. What I have is

Thereupon Fëanor left him, and sat in dark thought beyond the walls of Alqualondë, until his host was assembled. When he judged that his strength was enough, he went to the Haven of the Swans and began to man the ships that were anchored there and to take them away by force. But the Teleri withstood him, and cast many of the Noldor into the sea. Then swords were drawn, and a bitter fight was fought upon the ships, and about the lamplit quays and piers of the Haven, and even upon the great arch of its gate.

One interesting thing about this battle is that Tolkien spent some time trying to keep various Noldor out of it. One of the volumes HoME mentions that Fingon and Turgon did not take part (although the Silm implies otherwise re: Fingon) and other writings state that Galadriel did not participate (some even say she wasn't part of the Flight).
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on October 18, 2021, 04:55:46 PM
Practical question. In the beginning of the chapter it says something like (remember I have a translation) “and the valar were sitting in shadow, for it was night”, which is of course the case with the Trees just destroyed. But, when the noldor attack the teleri at the harbor to get the ships, it says ”swords were drawn at dawn”. What dawn? Everything was in darkness at this time, no?

For the same reason, how come they could see the dangerous ice in the Helcaraxë? It specifically says that the cold fog was not penetrated by stars. Elven eyes or not, how far can they possibly see in those conditions?
I believe it's called "plot holes".

Also I had completely forgotten that Fëanor had the ships torched when Fingolfin’s people were still in the West. He’s even worse than I remembered.
Yeah, Fëanor went off the deep end pretty fast.

I believe this is a good moment to ask the question that's been on my mind for a while now: what exactly did Fëanor do wrong? I mean, he did plenty of wrong obviously, but which one of his decisions was the one that tipped the scales? I don't have a definite answer myself yet, but I'd like to hear what you think.

Since it's been brought up last week, here are the songs relevant to this chapter, and some of the previous chapter as well:

Into the Storm

Nightfall

The Curse of Feanor
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on October 18, 2021, 05:21:35 PM

I believe this is a good moment to ask the question that's been on my mind for a while now: what exactly did Fëanor do wrong? I mean, he did plenty of wrong obviously, but which one of his decisions was the one that tipped the scales? I don't have a definite answer myself yet, but I'd like to hear what you think.

I think it was not one single decision. There were many actions together that made things go the wrong direction.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on October 18, 2021, 05:40:21 PM
I think it was not one single decision. There were many actions together that made things go the wrong direction.
But surely there must have been that one step too far, right? The point of no return?

It's a very tricky question and that's precisely why I find it worth asking.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on October 18, 2021, 05:55:51 PM
I think the wording of the Oath made tragedy inevitable. Was there anything before?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 18, 2021, 06:10:33 PM
Tehta, ok, the “dawn” was then a brainfart of the (generally very good) translator. It is exactly in the paragraph you quoted.

RanVor, it is an excellent question! I also don’t have a definite answer, but he was pretty far gone by the time they took the Oath. They wouldn’t have taken such an oath if they weren’t. One of the possible moments was when Fëanor refused to give up the Silmarils to return the light that was lost with the Trees. It’s a bit unclear o me whether the Silmarils would have been lost or consumed in the process, or just used to “seed” the light again. His refusal didn’t have immediate effect as the Silmarils were already stolen, but like the narrator points out, if he had at first agreed, many events that followed could have been different. That he would covet them so that he’d rather keep them than return light to all of the world, seems beyond mere selfishness.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on October 26, 2021, 04:18:57 AM
Nothing interesting to say about this week's chapters? We have dorfs in Beleriand, the Sun, the Moon and the coming of humans!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on October 26, 2021, 10:59:33 AM
Sorry I’m on a work trip and my Silmarillion is at home! I’ll try to get to it when I go back. But you are very welcome to start for the week!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 01, 2021, 06:00:44 PM
Oh noes, I must whine. I’ll whine under cut.

Spoiler: show
This is so, so BORING! Why do we need to know the names of every forest, hill and river in Beleriand! Argh! *gripping hair in exasperation*


In other news, I had completely forgotten Feänor dies already at this point,

How many there are of the elves in Beleriand? They seem to make up many nations, so are they in the tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?

And how big is this area? The translation uses a very old-fashioned uni of distance and I’m not sure how much it should make. For example on the third page of chapter 14 is says to the effect of “south or Ard-Galen there was the great highland by the name of Dorthonion, and it was XXX from east to west” (from west to east actually in translation, we always say west to east, not east to west in Finnish. Unless of course something is actually moving.)

Why does Thingol get praised as the great and magnificent Hidden King who keeps his people protected, when it’s actually Melian’s magic that does the trick?

Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on November 01, 2021, 11:37:32 PM
Maedhros is repentant. His brothers, not so much.

We need to know the name of every forest and river in Beleriand because it makes sense for a scholar to mention such things. And because Tolkien wanted us to.

Why does Thingol get praised as the great and magnificent Hidden King who keeps his people protected, when it’s actually Melian’s magic that does the trick?
I'd like to give you some rational and logical reason, but honestly, it's probably because of sexism.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 02, 2021, 04:30:10 AM
Chapter Fourteen: proof that a picture is often worth a thousand words. All we needed was a map (which also exists, so not sure why we have the text, too).

There are several possible estimates for the number of Elves in Beleriand. I used to know their details, long ago, but now I just remember that even the smallest one was > one million. Most were not Noldor, however. (In general, reading the musings here keeps giving me a sense of deja-vu, like 'oh, I remember researching this once; it was a lot of work, pity I forgot what I found'. But the good news was that, if I was doing the research for a story, there was usually a wide-enough range of interpretations that I could pick and choose the one I wanted.)

I think Dorthonion is 180 miles east-to-west, if you translate the leagues. But of course on some maps it appears bigger. (Polish also has it in the e-w direction, btw, or rather 'sunrise to sunset': our directions are named that way, also 'half day' for south and 'half night' for north)

Regarding Thingol, yes, sexism. But also, there is a bit of a tendency to describe several of the Elvish rulers as the wisest and tallest. I remember Turgon in particular. (I do not judge his wisdom highly, myself.)

I find Feanor's death both personally satisfying (because ha!) and narratively odd. Oh, and it's possible that Maglor was repentant too.
Spoiler: show
(I think the Silm has him be the one to save the kids later? Although I know it was Maedhros in some other versions. And doesn't he argue against stealing the jewels at the very end?)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on November 02, 2021, 10:14:17 AM
Regarding Thingol, yes, sexism. But also, there is a bit of a tendency to describe several of the Elvish rulers as the wisest and tallest. I remember Turgon in particular. (I do not judge his wisdom highly, myself.)
Spoiler: show
Turgon's wisdom was mostly in doing what Ulmo told him to do. Which can actually be considered pretty wise in context, since it was not listening to the Valar that started the whole mess in the first place.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 02, 2021, 11:19:38 AM
Spoiler: show
Turgon's wisdom was mostly in doing what Ulmo told him to do. Which can actually be considered pretty wise in context, since it was not listening to the Valar that started the whole mess in the first place.


I absolutely agree that 
Spoiler: show
following Ulmo's advice was wise (and rare among Finwions).
But
Spoiler: show
he only did it up to a point! When Tuor shows up and, in the voice of Ulmo, tells him it's time to leave, he "[becomes] proud", and decides that he knows Gondolin's strength better than a Vala, and ends up listening to his creepy/traumatized nephew Maeglin instead of to Ulmo's messenger. Especially right before the Fall of Gondolin, when Tuor advises evacuation, and Maeglin (and Salgant) convince Turgon to try holding the city.


I do also appreciate that Turgon
Spoiler: show
approved of his daughter's marriage the obviously worthy but mortal Tuor, and did not suddenly decide to set Tuor weird impossible tasks, the way Thingol did.


Sorry, spoilers are hard to avoid...
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 02, 2021, 12:44:47 PM
Ran and tehta, I think we all (at least all who are discussing) are rereading. So I vote for more discussion rather than strict adherence to spoiler rules. Especially if you can keep it under spoiler cuts, all is well! And if not, still all is well although perhaps slightly less well than in the first alternative :)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 02, 2021, 01:13:30 PM
I moved the spoilers around. I hope that's better. (For some reason I thought we were reading 14 and 15, so
Spoiler: show
Turgon's early dealings with Ulmo
were not a
Spoiler: show
spoiler
).

Of course, 15 is actually VERY INTERESTING so surely Jitter would have mentioned many bits from it. We are about to enter a whole sequence of chapters that I, for one, enjoy!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on November 04, 2021, 10:18:17 AM
Of course, 15 is actually VERY INTERESTING so surely Jitter would have mentioned many bits from it. We are about to enter a whole sequence of chapters that I, for one, enjoy!
Oh yes, next week's chapters are very interesting indeed.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 04, 2021, 12:51:59 PM
Oh yes, next week's chapters are very interesting indeed.

I most certainly hope it is! I almost gave up with 13&14, well especially 14. I had to take two breaks to read a bit over 20 pages   o_O :onni:
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 07, 2021, 04:24:18 PM
Quick thoughts on re-reading the next two chapters!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on November 07, 2021, 04:53:09 PM
I also have a very specific headcanon (https://archiveofourown.org/works/1577822) I like, that Galadriel didn't sit around twiddling her thumbs during the First Age, but established her own Hidden Kingdom which was actually a proper secret. (Unlike the Hidden City of Gondolin, which was clearly common gossip.)
That's a pretty neat idea.

[...] that she was wholly willing, but then got bored, which seems in character for her. [...]
That's how I read it. Eol clearly wasn't the most pleasant person around, though.

And the Greek Tragedy/dark saga feel of the Maeglin chapter. All these people, acting according to their natures, bringing about a very dark conclusion...
Maeglin wasn't as much of an a-hole as I remembered. He was still kind of an a-hole, though. I agree with the Greek tragedy comparison, it's very apt.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on November 07, 2021, 10:41:30 PM
Hmm. Now did Quenya manage to stick around as the language of scholars when people weren't allowed to speak it? Were there no Telerin/Sindarin scholars?
This is one of the things that could be interpreted in many ways. But all interpretations that come to my mind are at least a little strange in the context of the story.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 08, 2021, 11:06:09 AM
I was also disgusted about the “took her to his wife”. Even though this here version says “not fully unwilling”, that hardly seems sufficient amount of consent! It’s also contradictory, when Aredhel clearly has agency in that Turgon can only ask her not to go, but doesn’t really have power over her. And yet the next minute she’s something to be taken when Eöl finds her beautiful.

Tolkiengateway.net mentions several versions of the story in Tolkien’s writings. In one version it’s clear that Eöl took Aredhel as his wife by force. On the other hand there is an essay stating that sexual assault is very rare among elves and “an Elf can reject bodily life to thwart sexual assault”. So yeah, Aredhel clearly consented as is demonstrated by her lack of dying to put a stop to the wife-taking…

I want my elves to be good and kind, not just noble. So, I was quite shaken reading this as a teenager. I’ve been low key thinking that maybe I was just too young and therefore didn’t understand it enough to appreciate it, but no. It really is that everything is terrible!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: moredhel on November 08, 2021, 11:29:51 AM
I want my elves to be good and kind, not just noble. So, I was quite shaken reading this as a teenager. I’ve been low key thinking that maybe I was just too young and therefore didn’t understand it enough to appreciate it, but no. It really is that everything is terrible!
In this part of a story I think tolkien was inspired by greek mythology and there are depressing standards how women are treated.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 08, 2021, 02:02:46 PM
In this part of a story I think tolkien was inspired by greek mythology and there are depressing standards how women are treated.

Yeah. I am not much entertained by tragedy. So I guess I’m reading the wrong book :)

But, this bit was indeed more interesting than the list of rivers!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Róisín on November 08, 2021, 06:50:40 PM
Also ‘took her to wife’ tended to be a commonly used term in older versions of English for just ‘got married’. Consider how often the phrase turns up in old stories, and in translations to English of classical works and indeed the Christian scriptures.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 10, 2021, 07:42:10 AM
Róisín, it’s not jus that wording but also it’s specifically mentioned that she was “not wholly unwilling”. Which seems to indicate she was somewhat unwilling, but agreed anyways. We don’t know whether she agreed on

“O beautiful woman, come be my wife and I will respect you. Decide what you will, but you will remain in my lands forever, so it’s me or solitude”

Or

“Beautiful woman, come be my wife. If you not come willingly, I will force you”

Or

“Woman, come be my wife or I will rape and kill you on the spot”
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 10, 2021, 10:01:35 AM
"Beautiful woman, come have dinner and check out my forge."

"Ooh, at least someone around here can smith like a Noldo. And you're not bad looking... You know, my cousin Artanis has taken up with one of the locals*. Why should she have all the fun?"

Eol's rules might not sound so terrible, at first. It makes sense that he would not want his wife to be pally with the Feanorions, known murderers of the his kin. And not going outside during the day is somewhat comparable to adopting a spouse's dietary restrictions.

* In most versions, Galadriel met Celeborn after the flight of the Noldor. The only exception is the one where he was a Alqualonde Teler called Teleporno.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 17, 2021, 04:25:12 PM
Ha! Finally some proper elven behavior! Finrod, upon meeting with the first humans in the West, is very much ooooohhh elves ✨🤩✨🤩✨🤩 However, I have no recollection of ever having been aware that some elves can (or, at least, Finrod could) read human minds. His singing and the way it presented as visions for the humans is very impressive.

It’s nice to notice a fleeting mention of Caranthir being nice to the humans who passed in his lands!

I also note that humans took to speaking elven languages, I assume sindarin. This seems a bit surprising, it would make more sense to me that it’s easy for the elves to learn human languages if they want, but learning the finesse of elvish would be beyond most people’s short lifetimes. It doesn’t even say that theirs would be a simpler version!

Probably not very surprisingly, I also like Haleth. Sadly, it wasn’t possible to have a career and a family, of course! But at least she doesn’t get scorned for it, it’s only mentioned she remained unwed.

Fingolfin is also a proper elf lord when he storms to the gates of Angband, despite the fact it’s the end of him (or, perhaps, even more so because of it?).

Despite the lists of names (maybe the professor himself occasionally got a bit bored too? I mean, Húrin and his brother Huor, and their sons Túrin and - Tuor? Seriously?) I actually enjoyed these two chapters! Improvement!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on November 17, 2021, 10:39:53 PM
Uh, I still haven't finished chapter 18. I've had other things on my mind lately. :( I'm gonna have to do it today, I guess.


It’s nice to notice a fleeting mention of Caranthir being nice to the humans who passed in his lands!
Yeah, and surprising, considering who Caranthir is.

I also note that humans took to speaking elven languages, I assume sindarin. This seems a bit surprising, it would make more sense to me that it’s easy for the elves to learn human languages if they want, but learning the finesse of elvish would be beyond most people’s short lifetimes. It doesn’t even say that theirs would be a simpler version!
That's a weird assumption. Just because elves are long-lived doesn't mean their language has to be unnecessarily complicated.

Probably not very surprisingly, I also like Haleth. Sadly, it wasn’t possible to have a career and a family, of course! But at least she doesn’t get scorned for it, it’s only mentioned she remained unwed.
Maybe she just didn't find anyone suitable for her.

Fingolfin is also a proper elf lord when he storms to the gates of Angband, despite the fact it’s the end of him (or, perhaps, even more so because of it?).
Ah, yes, the most badass creature in the history of Middle-Earth. Here's a song about it:
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Róisín on November 18, 2021, 01:47:55 AM
Ran, that is one powerful and interesting piece of music!
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on November 27, 2021, 02:08:44 PM
What, nobody talking about how Thingol was an idiot and a terrible father?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 27, 2021, 02:50:34 PM
I couldn't participate last week (houseguests...) and I have forgotten which chapters we're up to now. If I am reminded, I will go reread and post many notes.

I think I have already obliquely given my opinion on Thingol. And on most of the Elven Kings in general: as I said, I tend to side with the middle-managers. In Doriath, that's Beleg and Mablung, who mostly acted sensibly (but still got killed off by the morons surrounding them).
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on November 27, 2021, 03:50:42 PM
This week’s conversation is on Chapter 19, Beren and Luthien. I am running late, I’m just reading it now. And I realized we should have the next chunks listed already as supposedly we are reading the next bit while lively debating C19 :) I’ll post more of the reading schedule shortly!

EDIT: added the rest of the reading schedule. This week’s reading is only Chapter 20, because 21 is so long it has to go alone. I suppose it’s only fair this week has a short bit as it was only listed in Saturday :) Although I’m sure e code as to what will be this week’s reading is not impossible to crack ;)
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: tehta on November 27, 2021, 05:26:39 PM
Reading 17-18 now...

Chapter 17: Wow, Thingol's suspicions of Haleth were just as silly as she pointed out, weren't they?  Also, don't the Three Houses of Men sound a bit plagiarized from the three main kindred of Elves? The house of Beor is explicitly likened to the Noldor, and the house of Haleth is implicitly likened to some of the Sindar (wood dwelling, not so eager for lore).

Chapter 18: That's a very depressing story, all round, but also one that hides many very dramatic episodes that could be written out with more detail and become truly gripping (e.g,  the expanded version of the Fall of
Spoiler: show
Gondolin
is, at least to me, a great read). Similarly, I would love to know/read more about Huor and Hurin's time in Gondolin.
Overall, though, one thing leaps out to me: the Easterlings. Dark skinned and treacherous. Really?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on December 01, 2021, 04:10:48 PM
So, Nirnaeth Arnoediad. The elves get stomped, Fingon dies and Húrin gets captured, setting the stage for the tragedy of Túrin Turambar. Overall, not much to talk about. The battles in The Silmarillion seem to be rather unimpressive in general. Does anyone have anything to add?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on December 01, 2021, 05:08:36 PM
Sory, I’m still terribly lagging! The last I’ve read is Beren and Luthien, which has some proper elf activity again, but is also quite depressing.

I’m (kind of) glad we are doing this together because I don’t think I would finish it if we weren’t.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on December 01, 2021, 05:32:12 PM
Sory, I’m still terribly lagging! The last I’ve read is Beren and Luthien, which has some proper elf activity again, but is also quite depressing.

I’m (kind of) glad we are doing this together because I don’t think I would finish it if we weren’t.
Don't worry, I'm behind as well. I've only finished chapter 20 today, and only because it was short.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: RanVor on December 12, 2021, 05:08:31 PM
In light of the general inactivity of this thread for the past week, I propose delaying the discussion about Chapter 21 until December 13th, or maybe even December 20th, to give people more time to catch up with this very long chapter. Everybody in favor?
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on December 12, 2021, 05:13:24 PM
Ran, you read my mind! I was about to suggest the same, except even a bit longer. I have loads to do before Christmas both at work and home, and I suspect it's the same for everyone. So perhaps we should take a pre-Christmas break, and get back to this on the week of 27th?

And you are right, chapter 21 is the one we should go for as that's where the thread sorta died.
Title: Re: (Re)reading The Silmarillion
Post by: Jitter on December 12, 2021, 05:16:44 PM
I edited the reading schedule so that Chapter 21 is now "due" December 27th. I hope everyone else is ok with this too.